Advertisement

Citizen Involvement: What Does It Mean?

  • Sharon J. WilliamsEmail author
  • Lynne Caley
Chapter
  • 30 Downloads

Abstract

In this chapter we address issues around patient and service user involvement asking why it has become best practice to widen the body of those involved with the design and delivery of healthcare. In particular, we reflect on the manner in which the individual seems to have taken precedence over the community, and why this has led to the growth of citizen involvement in the management of health and well-being. We recognise that organisations have a role to play in facilitating citizen involvement. We suggest that there are challenges in taking this approach as well as opportunity costs, and we query whether the benefits outweigh these costs.

Keywords

Person-centred Citizen-centred Co-production Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) Healthcare Citizen Science Shared decision-making Human factors 

References

  1. Beresford, P. (2013). Beyond the usual suspects. London: Shaping Our Lives.Google Scholar
  2. Clarke, D., Jones, F., Harris, R., & Robert, G. (2017). What outcomes are associated with developing and implementing co-produced interventions in acute healthcare settings? A rapid evidence synthesis. BMJ Open, 7, e014650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Coulter, A., & Ellins, J. (2006). Patient focused interventions: A review of the evidence. London: The Health Foundation.Google Scholar
  4. Den Broeder, L., Van Oers, H., Schuit, A., & Wagemakers, A. (2018). Citizen science for public health. Health Promotion International, 33, 505–514.Google Scholar
  5. Dewey, J. (1969). Experience and education. London: Collier-Macmillan.Google Scholar
  6. Drolet, B. C., & White, C. L. (2012). Selective Paternalism. AMA Journal of Ethics, 84(3), 582–588.Google Scholar
  7. Gura, T. (2013). Citizen science: Amateur experts. Nature, 496(744), 259–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Harries, P., Barron, D., & Ballinger, C. (2019). Developments in public involvement and co-production in research: Embracing our values and those of our service users and carers. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, First Published May 27, 2019 Editorial. Available at:  https://doi.org/10.1177/0308022619844143. Accessed 28 July 2019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Health Education England, Skills for Health, Skills for Care. (2017). New framework to promote person-centred approaches in healthcare. Available at http://tinyurl.com/y89gvzzr. Accessed 5 Aug 2019.
  10. Hor, S., Godbold, N., Collier, A., & Iedema, I. (2013). Finding the patient in safety. Health (London, England), 17(6), 567–583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. INVOLVE. (2012). Briefing notes for researchers: Public involvement in NHS, public health and social care research. Available at: www.invo.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/9938_INVOLVE_Briefing_Notes_WEB.pdf. Accessed 17 July 2019.
  12. INVOLVE. (2018). Guidance on co-producing a research project. Available at: www.invo.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/Copro_Guidance_Mar18.pdf. Accessed 17 July 2019.
  13. INVOLVE. (2019). Welcome to INVOLVE. Available at: www.invo.org.uk/. Accessed 19 July 2019.
  14. Irwin, A. (2015). Science, public engagement. In J. Wright (Ed.), International encyclopedia of the social and behavioural sciences (pp. 255–260). Oxford: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lichten, C., Ioppolo, R. D., Angelo, C., Simmons, R., & Morgan Jones, M. (2018). Citizen science: Crowdsourcing for research. Cambridge: The Health Improvement Studies Institute. Available at https://www.thisinstitute.cam.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/THIS-Institute-Crowdsourcing-for-research-978-1-9996539-0-3.pdf. Accessed 5 Aug 2019.
  16. Mullen, C. (2017). Person-centred care – A 2017 framework. British Journal of Healthcare Assistants, 11(12), 597–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. NHS England. (2014). NHS five year forward view. Available at www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/5yfv-web.pdf. Accessed 5 Aug 2019.
  18. Nutbrown, C., Bishop, J., & Wheeler, H. (2015). Co-production of family literacy projects to enhance early literary development. Journal of Children’s Services, 10(3), 265–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ocloo, J., & Fulop, N. (2012). Developing a critical approach to patient and public involvement in patient safety in the NHS: Learning lessons from other parts of the public sector? Health Expectations, 15(4), 424–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ocloo, J., & Matthews, R. (2016). From tokenism to empowerment: Progressing patient and public involvement in healthcare improvement. BMJ Quality and Safety, 2, 626–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Osborne, S., Radnor, Z., & Strokosch, K. (2016). Co-production and the co-creation of value in public services: A suitable case for treatment? Public Management Review, 18, 639–653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Pandya-Wood, R., Elliott, J., & Barron, D. S. (2019). Service user and lay involvement in healthcare. In C. Llewellyn (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of psychology, health and medicine (3rd ed., pp. 347–352). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Polanyi, M. (1967). The tacit dimension. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
  24. Renedo, A., Marston, C., Spyridonidis, D., & Barlow, J. (2015). Patient and public involvement in healthcare quality improvement: How organisations can help patients and professionals to collaborative. Public Management Review, 17(1), 17–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Riesch, H., & Potter, C. (2013). Citizen science as seen by scientists: Methodological, epistemological and ethical dimensions. Public Understanding Science, 23(1), 107–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Tritter, J. (2009). Revolution or evolution: The challenges of conceptualising patient and public involvement in a consumerist world. Health Expectations, 12, 275–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Vennick, F., van de Bovenkamp, H., Putters, K., & Crit, K. (2016). Co-production in healthcare: Rhetoric and practice. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 82(1), 150–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business Press.Google Scholar
  29. Wait, S., & Nolte, E. (2006). Public involvement policies in health: Exploring their conceptual basis. Health Economic Policy Law, 1(2), 149–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ward, J. K., & Armitage, G. (2012). Can patients report patient safety incidents in a hospital setting? A systematic review. BMJ Quality and Safety, 21(8), 685–699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ward, J. K., McEachan, R. R. C., Lawton, R., Armitage, G., Watt, I., Wright, J., & The Yorkshire Quality Safety Research Group. (2011). Patient involvement in patient safety: Protocol for developing an intervention using patient reports of organisational safety and patient incident reporting. BMC Health Services Research, 11, 130 Available online at: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/11/130
  32. Weber, M. (1964). The theory of social and economic organisation (trans: Henderson, A. M., & Parsons, T.). New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  33. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning as a social system. Available at http://www.co-i-l.com/coil/knowledge-garden/cop/lss.shtml. Accessed 4 Aug 2019.
  34. Woolley, J., McGowan, M., Teare, H., Coathup, V., Fishman, J., Settersten, R., Sterckx, S., Kaye, J., & Juengst, E. (2016). Citizen science or scientific citizenship? Disentangling the uses of public engagement rhetoric in national research initiatives. BMC Medical Ethics, 17, 33–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. World Health Organization. (1978). Declaration of Alma-Ata, International Conference on Primary Health Care, Alma-Ata, USSR, 6–12, September. Available at: www.who.int/publications/almaata_declaration_en.pdf. Accessed 22 July 2019.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Human & Health SciencesSwansea UniversitySwanseaUK
  2. 2.Consolidated Caley LtdPeterboroughUK

Personalised recommendations