Advertisement

Intelligent Data Acquisition Method for Cross-border E-commerce Guidance and Purchase Considering User Demand

  • Jiahua LiEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering book series (LNICST, volume 301)

Abstract

At present, due to the unknown online procurement, and remote distance for the cross-border e-commerce shopping guide, business considerations for users were not so full. Based on this, a cross-border e-commerce shopping guide big data intelligent collection method considering user needs was proposed. Through the mobile port of big data to collect and explore the online social retail collection method of big data, it focused on promoting the way of big data onto intelligent collection, and promoted cross-border e-commerce shopping guide big data to better carry out commodity circulation of user needs. Experiments showed that the big data collection method studied in this paper better combined user needs and merchant profit, and helped to improve user experience.

Keywords

User needs Cross-border E-commerce shopping guide Big data Intelligent acquisition Optimization 

Notes

Acknowledgements

“Innovation Research on Cross-border E-commerce Shopping Guide Platform Based on Big Data and AI Technology”, Funded by Ministry of Education Humanities and Social Sciences Research and Planning Fund (No.: 18YJAZH042); Key Research Platform Project of Guangdong Education Department (No.: 2017GWTSCX064); The 13th Five-Year Plan Project of Philosophy and Social Science Development in Guangzhou (No.: 2018GZGJ208).

References

  1. 1.
    Maridn, R.J., Duncan, C.P.: The transformation of retailing institutions: beyond the wheel of retailing and life cycle theories. J. Macromark. 16(4), 58–66 (2017)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rousseau, D.M., Sitkin, S.B., Burt, R.S., Camerer, C.: Not so different after all: a cross-discipline view of trust. Acad. Manag. Rev. 23(3), 438–458 (2018)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sillence, E., Briggs, P., Harris, P., et al.: A framework for understanding trust factors in web-based health advice. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 64(8), 697–713 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chellappa, R.K., Pavlou, P.A.: Perceived information security, financial liability and consumer trust in electronic commerce transactions. Logistics Inf. Manag. 15(5/6), 358–368 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Yang, H., Yin, D., Hong, R.: Research on bridge automatic identification methods in high-resolution remote sensing images. Comput. Simul. 23(9), 119–122 (2016)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Shankar, V., Urban, G.L., Sultan, F.: Online trust: a stakeholder perspective, concepts, implications, and future directions. J. Strateg. Inf. Syst. 11(3), 325–344 (2012)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Willemyns, M., Gallois, C., Callan, V.: Trust me, I’m your boss: trust and power in supervisor—supervisee communication. Int. J. Hum. Resour. Manag. 14(1), 117–127 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zhang, P., Dran, G.V., Blake, P., Pipithsuksunt, V.: A comparison of the most important website feature in different domains: an empirical study of user perceptions. In: Proceedings of the Sixth AMCIS Conference on Information System, vol. 6, pp. l367–1372 (2018)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Choo, C.W., Detlor, B., Turnbull, D.: Information seeking on the web: an integrated model of browsing and searching. First Monday 9, 2 (2018)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© ICST Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Guangzhou Vocational and Technical University of Science and TechnologyGuangzhouChina

Personalised recommendations