Discard, Emotions, and Empathy on the Margins of the Waste Stream
- 16 Downloads
The objects we choose to throw away, and how we discard those objects, can reveal much about materiality and the material basis of capitalism in the twenty-first century. This chapter explores how analyses of the assemblages and locations of recent illegal dumping events illuminate tensions between structural forces, the ways we relate to our possessions, and the motivations prompting the severance of those relationships. Using data gathered during a faculty-student research project addressing contemporary surface assemblages, we also examine the emotive capacities of illegally discarded belongings. With an analytic emphasis on intact assemblages, we argue that acknowledging the emotional contours of unsanctioned discard not only complements methodologically rigorous, data-driven archaeologies of the contemporary but also provides a forum for grappling with fieldworkers’ affective responses to handling culturally familiar objects. Such responses, in turn, can help to cultivate deeper-seated empathy and respect for non-Western connections to objects, space, and place in other archaeological research contexts.
KeywordsDiscard Emotion Contemporary archaeology Waste stream Illegal dumping Empathy
This faculty-student research was generously supported by a Research Matters Grant, a ConnSSHARP Fellowship, the Office of the Dean of Faculty, and the Department of Anthropology at Connecticut College. We are grateful to the employees at the Town of Waterford Public Works Department, the Town of East Lyme Transfer Station, and the Town of Montville Transfer Station for indulging our many questions and patiently discussing the nuances of illegal garbage dumping behavior. Objects and materials collected from illegal dump sites for laboratory analysis were ultimately returned to the waste stream. Morgan Kleyweg ‘17 enthusiastically helped with early project planning as well as cataloging the many finds from Site 2. We thank our colleagues for enduring numerous conversations about discard and the emotional experience of writing about emotion in discard. We are deeply appreciative of the editors and three anonymous reviewers for constructive critique and helpful suggestions. Of course, we assume all responsibility for any incoherency, errors, or omissions.
- Buchli, V., & Lucas, G. (2001). The absent present: Archaeologies of the contemporary past. In V. Buchli & G. Lucas (Eds.), Archaeologies of the contemporary past (pp. 3–18). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- CGS: Connecticut General Statutes. (2018). Legislative Commissioners’ Office. Sections 22a-250a and 22a-250c. https://www.cga.ct.gov/lco/statutes.asp. Accessed 2 Mar 2018.
- Chatterjee, H. J., & Noble, G. (2009). Object therapy: A student-selected component exploring the potential of museum object handling as an enrichment activity for patients in hospital. Global Journal of Health Sciences, 1(2), 42–49.Google Scholar
- De León, J. (2013). Undocumented use-wear and the materiality of habitual suffering in the Sonoran Desert. Journal of Material Culture, 18(4), 1–31.Google Scholar
- De León, J. (2015). The land of open graves: Living and dying on the migrant trail. Oakland: University of California Press.Google Scholar
- Edgeworth, M. (2014). Introduction. In M. Edgeworth, J. Benjamin, B. Clarke, Z. Crossland, E. Domanska, A. C. Gorman, P. Graves-Brown, E. C. Harris, M. J. Hudson, J. M. Kelly, V. J. Paz, M. A. Salerno, C. Witmore, & A. Zarankin (Eds.), Archaeology of the Anthropocene (pp. 73–77). Journal of Contemporary Archaeology, 1(1), 73–132.Google Scholar
- Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
- Graves-Brown, P. (2014). When was the anthropocene? (and why?). In M. Edgeworth, J. Benjamin, B. Clarke, Z. Crossland, E. Domanska, A. C. Gorman, P. Graves-Brown, E. C. Harris, M. J. Hudson, J. M. Kelly, V. J. Paz, M. A. Salerno, C. Witmore, & A. Zarankin (Eds.), Archaeology of the Anthropocene (pp. 77–81). Journal of Contemporary Archaeology, 1(1), 73–132.Google Scholar
- Humes, E. (2012). Garbology: Our dirty love affair with trash. New York: Avery.Google Scholar
- Kondo, M. (Creator). (2019). Tidying Up. The Jackal Group. Netflix. https://www.netflix.com/watch/80209464?
- Mauss, M. (2011 ). The gift: Forms and functions of exchange in archaic societies. Eastford, Connecticut: Martino Fine Books.Google Scholar
- Nagle, R. (2013). Picking up: On the streets and behind the trucks with the sanitation workers of New York City. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
- Pétursdóttir, Þ., & Olsen, B. (2014). An archaeology of ruins. In B. Olsen & Þ. Pétursdóttir (Eds.), Ruin memories: Materialities, aesthetics, and the archaeology of the recent past (pp. 3–29). Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Rathje, W. (1979). Modern material culture studies. Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory, 2, 1–37.Google Scholar
- Rathje, W., & Murphy, C. (1992). Rubbish! The archaeology of garbage. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
- Reno, J. (2013). Waste. In P. Graves-Brown, R. Harrison, & A. Piccini (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of the archaeology of the contemporary world (pp. 261–272). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Stó:lō Nation Lalems ye Stó:lō Si:ya:m. (2003). Stó:lō Heritage Policy Manual. http://www.srrmcentre.com/files/File/Stolo%20Heritage%20Policy%20Manual%20-%20May%202003%20-%20v1.2.pdf. Accessed 16 Mar 2018.
- Tunnell, K. (2008). Illegal dumping: Large and small scale littering in rural Kentucky. Justice Studies Faculty and Staff Research, Paper 8. http://encompass.eku.edu/cjps_fsresearch/8. Accessed 16 Mar 2018.