Advertisement

Discard, Emotions, and Empathy on the Margins of the Waste Stream

  • Anthony P. GraeschEmail author
  • Corbin Maynard
  • Avery Thomas
Chapter
  • 16 Downloads

Abstract

The objects we choose to throw away, and how we discard those objects, can reveal much about materiality and the material basis of capitalism in the twenty-first century. This chapter explores how analyses of the assemblages and locations of recent illegal dumping events illuminate tensions between structural forces, the ways we relate to our possessions, and the motivations prompting the severance of those relationships. Using data gathered during a faculty-student research project addressing contemporary surface assemblages, we also examine the emotive capacities of illegally discarded belongings. With an analytic emphasis on intact assemblages, we argue that acknowledging the emotional contours of unsanctioned discard not only complements methodologically rigorous, data-driven archaeologies of the contemporary but also provides a forum for grappling with fieldworkers’ affective responses to handling culturally familiar objects. Such responses, in turn, can help to cultivate deeper-seated empathy and respect for non-Western connections to objects, space, and place in other archaeological research contexts.

Keywords

Discard Emotion Contemporary archaeology Waste stream Illegal dumping Empathy 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This faculty-student research was generously supported by a Research Matters Grant, a ConnSSHARP Fellowship, the Office of the Dean of Faculty, and the Department of Anthropology at Connecticut College. We are grateful to the employees at the Town of Waterford Public Works Department, the Town of East Lyme Transfer Station, and the Town of Montville Transfer Station for indulging our many questions and patiently discussing the nuances of illegal garbage dumping behavior. Objects and materials collected from illegal dump sites for laboratory analysis were ultimately returned to the waste stream. Morgan Kleyweg ‘17 enthusiastically helped with early project planning as well as cataloging the many finds from Site 2. We thank our colleagues for enduring numerous conversations about discard and the emotional experience of writing about emotion in discard. We are deeply appreciative of the editors and three anonymous reviewers for constructive critique and helpful suggestions. Of course, we assume all responsibility for any incoherency, errors, or omissions.

References

  1. Arnold, J. E., Graesch, A. P., Ochs, E., & Ragazzini, E. (2012). Life at home in the Twenty-First Century: 32 families open their doors. Los Angeles: Cotsen Institute of Archaeology Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Buchli, V., & Lucas, G. (2001). The absent present: Archaeologies of the contemporary past. In V. Buchli & G. Lucas (Eds.), Archaeologies of the contemporary past (pp. 3–18). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. CGS: Connecticut General Statutes. (2018). Legislative Commissioners’ Office. Sections 22a-250a and 22a-250c. https://www.cga.ct.gov/lco/statutes.asp. Accessed 2 Mar 2018.
  4. Chatterjee, H. J., & Noble, G. (2009). Object therapy: A student-selected component exploring the potential of museum object handling as an enrichment activity for patients in hospital. Global Journal of Health Sciences, 1(2), 42–49.Google Scholar
  5. Chenoweth, J. M. (2017). Natural graffiti and cultural plants: Memory, race, and contemporary archaeology in Yosemite and Detroit. American Anthropologist, 119(3), 464–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dawdy, S. L. (2009). Millennial archaeology: Locating the discipline in the age of insecurity. Archaeological Dialogues, 16(2), 131–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. De León, J. (2012). “Better to be hot than caught”: Excavating the conflicting roles of migrant material culture. American Anthropologist, 114(3), 477–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. De León, J. (2013). Undocumented use-wear and the materiality of habitual suffering in the Sonoran Desert. Journal of Material Culture, 18(4), 1–31.Google Scholar
  9. De León, J. (2015). The land of open graves: Living and dying on the migrant trail. Oakland: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  10. Edgeworth, M. (2014). Introduction. In M. Edgeworth, J. Benjamin, B. Clarke, Z. Crossland, E. Domanska, A. C. Gorman, P. Graves-Brown, E. C. Harris, M. J. Hudson, J. M. Kelly, V. J. Paz, M. A. Salerno, C. Witmore, & A. Zarankin (Eds.), Archaeology of the Anthropocene (pp. 73–77). Journal of Contemporary Archaeology, 1(1), 73–132.Google Scholar
  11. Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  12. González-Ruibal, A. (2008). Time to destroy: an archaeology of supermodernity. Current Anthropology, 49(2), 247–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Graves-Brown, P. (2011). Archaeology: a career in ruins. Archaeological Dialogues, 18(2), 168–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Graves-Brown, P. (2014). When was the anthropocene? (and why?). In M. Edgeworth, J. Benjamin, B. Clarke, Z. Crossland, E. Domanska, A. C. Gorman, P. Graves-Brown, E. C. Harris, M. J. Hudson, J. M. Kelly, V. J. Paz, M. A. Salerno, C. Witmore, & A. Zarankin (Eds.), Archaeology of the Anthropocene (pp. 77–81). Journal of Contemporary Archaeology, 1(1), 73–132.Google Scholar
  15. Graves-Brown, P., Harrison, R., & Puccini, A. (2013). Introduction. In P. Graves-Brown, R. Harrison, & A. Piccini (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of the archaeology of the contemporary world (pp. 1–23). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Harrison, R. (2011). Surface assemblages: Towards an archaeology in and of the present. Archaeological Dialogues, 18(2), 141–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hartnett, A., & Dawdy, S. L. (2013). The archaeology of illegal and illicit economies. Annual Review of Anthropology, 42, 37–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Humes, E. (2012). Garbology: Our dirty love affair with trash. New York: Avery.Google Scholar
  19. Hutchins, E. (2005). Material anchors for conceptual blends. Journal of Pragmatics, 37(10), 1555–1577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kondo, M. (Creator). (2019). Tidying Up. The Jackal Group. Netflix. https://www.netflix.com/watch/80209464?
  21. Laundra, K. H. (2011). The dump: a visual exploration of illegal dumping on public lands in rural America. Online Journal of Rural Research & Policy, 6(2), 1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lucas, G. (2004). Modern disturbances: on the ambiguities of archaeology. Modernism/Modernity, 11(1), 109–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mauss, M. (2011 [1925]). The gift: Forms and functions of exchange in archaic societies. Eastford, Connecticut: Martino Fine Books.Google Scholar
  24. Nagle, R. (2013). Picking up: On the streets and behind the trucks with the sanitation workers of New York City. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
  25. Pétursdóttir, Þ., & Olsen, B. (2014). An archaeology of ruins. In B. Olsen & Þ. Pétursdóttir (Eds.), Ruin memories: Materialities, aesthetics, and the archaeology of the recent past (pp. 3–29). Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Rathje, W. (1979). Modern material culture studies. Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory, 2, 1–37.Google Scholar
  27. Rathje, W. (1984). The garbage decade. American Behavioral Scientist, 28, 9–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rathje, W., & Murphy, C. (1992). Rubbish! The archaeology of garbage. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
  29. Reno, J. (2009). Your trash is someone’s treasure: the politics of value at a Michigan landfill. Journal of Material Culture, 14(1), 29–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Reno, J. (2013). Waste. In P. Graves-Brown, R. Harrison, & A. Piccini (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of the archaeology of the contemporary world (pp. 261–272). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Saxbe, D. E., & Repetti, R. (2010). No place like home: Home tours correlate with daily patterns of mood and cortisol. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(1), 71–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Schaepe, D. M., Angelbeck, B., Snook, D., & Welch, J. R. (2017). Archaeology as therapy: Connecting belongings, knowledge, time, place, and well-being. Current Anthropology, 58(4), 502–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Shanks, M., Platt, D., & Rathje, W. (2004). The perfume of garbage: Modernity and the archaeological. Modernism/modernity, 11(1), 61–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Stó:lō Nation Lalems ye Stó:lō Si:ya:m. (2003). Stó:lō Heritage Policy Manual. http://www.srrmcentre.com/files/File/Stolo%20Heritage%20Policy%20Manual%20-%20May%202003%20-%20v1.2.pdf. Accessed 16 Mar 2018.
  35. Tarlow, S. (2000). Emotion in archaeology. Current Anthropology, 41(5), 713–730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Tarlow, S. (2012). The archaeology of emotion and affect. Annual Review of Anthropology, 41(1), 69–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Tunnell, K. (2008). Illegal dumping: Large and small scale littering in rural Kentucky. Justice Studies Faculty and Staff Research, Paper 8. http://encompass.eku.edu/cjps_fsresearch/8. Accessed 16 Mar 2018.
  38. Wilk, R., & Schiffer, M. B. (1979). The archaeology of vacant lots in Tucson, Arizona. American Antiquity, 44(3), 530–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Zimmerman, L. J., Singleton, C., & Welch, J. (2010). Activism and creating a translational archaeology of homelessness. World Archaeology, 42(3), 443–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Zimmerman, L. J., & Welch, J. (2011). Displaced and barely visible: archaeology and the material culture of homelessness. Historical Archaeology, 45(1), 67–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anthony P. Graesch
    • 1
    Email author
  • Corbin Maynard
    • 1
  • Avery Thomas
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of AnthropologyConnecticut CollegeNew LondonUSA

Personalised recommendations