Advertisement

Introduction to an Archaeology of the Heart

  • Natasha Lyons
  • Kisha SupernantEmail author
Chapter
  • 13 Downloads

Abstract

We introduce the concept and practice of an archaeology of the heart in this opening chapter. Drawn from various strands of archaeology and other disciplines, an archaeology of the heart is intended to speak to the whole person—our intellectual, emotional, spiritual, and physical selves. It aims to center the heart in our modes of practice, through how we relate to one another as people, our students, other archaeologists, community members, and our diverse publics. The chapter is divided into three parts that relate to the metaphor of the heart berry, or wild strawberry (Fragaria spp.), known to many cultures as a powerful medicine and source of healing. We begin with the seeds of our own heart-centered practice, telling the story of how the concept germinated and grew through our scholarship, friendship, and archaeological experiences. The second section forms the rhizomes, or runners, that comprise the different intertwined elements of an emergent heart-centered practice, including rigor, care, relationality, and emotion. The final section represents the berry itself, the fruits of our intellectual, emotional, spiritual, and physical labors of love as archaeologists, where we find themes that crosscut the expressions of heart-centered practice presented by our volume’s contributors.

Keywords

Heart-centered archaeology Heart-centered practice Rigor Relationality Care Emotion 

References

  1. Anderson, E. N. (1996). Ecologies of the heart: emotion, belief, and the environment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Archibald, J.-A. (2008). Indigenous storywork: Educating the heart, mind, body, and spirit. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.Google Scholar
  3. Atalay, S. (2006). Indigenous archaeology as decolonizing practice. American Indian Quarterly, 30(3/4), 280–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Atalay, S. (2012). Community-based archaeology: Research with, by, and for indigenous and local communities. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  5. Atalay, S. (2019). Braiding strands of wellness: How repatriation contributes to healing through embodied practice and storywork. The Public Historian, 41(1), 78–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Atalay, S., Clauss, L. R., McGuire, R. H., & Welch, J. R. (2014). Transforming archaeology: Activist practices and prospects. Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press.Google Scholar
  7. Barbezat, D. P., & Bush, M. (2013). Contemplative practices in higher education: Powerful methods to transform teaching and learning. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  8. Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an ecology of mind: Collected essays in anthropology, psychiatry, evolution, and epistemology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  9. Baxter, J. E. (2005). Introduction: the archaeology of childhood in context. Archeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association, 15(1), 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Baxter, J. E. (2008). The archaeology of childhood. Annual Review of Anthropology, 37, 159–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Baxter, J. E. (2009). Archaeological field schools: A guide for teaching in the field. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  12. Baxter, J. E. (2013). Status, sentimentality and structuration: An examination of ‘intellectual spaces’ for children in the study of America’s Historic Cemeteries. Childhood in the Past, 6(2), 106–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bekoff, M. (2002). The importance of ethics in conservation biology: Let’s be ethicists not ostriches. Endangered Species Update, 19(2), 23–26.Google Scholar
  14. Bhattacharya, H. (2008). New critical collaborative ethnography. In S. N. Hesse-Biber & P. Leavy (Eds.), Handbook of emergent methods (pp. 303–322). New York: Guildford Press.Google Scholar
  15. Biagetti, S., & Lugli, F. (2016). The intangible elements of culture in ethnoarchaeological research. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bond, G. C., & Gilliam, A. (Eds.). (1997). Social construction of the past: Representation as power. London: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  17. Brody, H. (1981). Maps and dreams: Indians and the British Columbia frontier. Vancouver: Douglas & McIntyre.Google Scholar
  18. Brownlee, K. (2019). Dibaajimindww Geteyaag: Ogiiyose, Noojigiigoo’iwe gaye Dibinawaag Nibiing Onji – Stories of the old ones: Hunter and fisher from sheltered water. Winnipeg: Manitoba Museum.Google Scholar
  19. Brumfiel, E. M. (1992). Distinguished lecture in archeology: breaking and entering the ecosystem—gender, class, and faction steal the show. American Anthropologist, 94(3), 551–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Canada, T. a. R. C. o. (2015). Honouring the truth, reconciling for the future: Summary of the final report of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada. Winnipeg: Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada.Google Scholar
  21. Charon, R. (2001a). Narrative medicine: A model for empathy, reflection, profession, and trust. JAMA, 286(15), 1897–1902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Charon, R. (2001b). Narrative medicine: Form, function, and ethics. Annals of Internal Medicine, 134(1), 83–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Charon, R. (2008). Narrative medicine: Honoring the stories of illness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Chatterjee, H., & Noble, G. (2016). Museums, health and well-being. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Christians, C. G. (2000). Ethics and politics in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 133–155). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  26. Christians, C. G. (2005). Ethics and politics in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 139–164). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  27. Clancy, K. B., Nelson, R. G., Rutherford, J. N., & Hinde, K. (2014). Survey of academic field experiences (SAFE): Trainees report harassment and assault. PLoS One, 9(7), 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Colwell-Chanthaphonh, C., & Ferguson, T. J. (Eds.). (2008a). Collaboration in archaeological practice: Engaging descendant communities. Plymouth: AltaMira Press.Google Scholar
  29. Colwell-Chanthaphonh, C., & Ferguson, T. J. (2008b). Collaboration in archaeological practice: The collaborative continuum (pp. 1–34). Lanham: AltaMira Press.Google Scholar
  30. De Castro, E. V. (2015). Who is afraid of the ontological wolf? Some comments on an ongoing anthropological debate. Cambridge Anthropology, 33(1), 2.Google Scholar
  31. Deloria, V. (1969). Custer died for your sins: An Indian manifesto. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
  32. Deloria, V. (1997). Red earth, white lies: Native Americans and the myth of scientific fact. Golden: Fulcrum Publishing.Google Scholar
  33. Dietz, T., Ostrom, E., & Stern, P. C. (2003). The struggle to govern the commons. Science, 302(5652), 1907–1912.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Echo-Hawk, R., & Zimmerman, L. J. (2006). Beyond racism: Some opinions about racialism and American Archaeology. American Indian Quarterly, 30, 461–485.Google Scholar
  35. Fleisher, J., & Norman, N. (2015). The archaeology of anxiety: The materiality of anxiousness, worry, and fear. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  36. Gero, J. M. (2015). Yutopian: Archaeology, ambiguity, and the production of knowledge in Northwest Argentina. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  37. Gero, J. M., & Conkey, M. W. (Eds.). (1991). Engendering archaeology: Women and prehistory. New York: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  38. Gilligan, C. (1982). New maps of development: New visions of maturity. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 52(2), 199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Gilligan, C. (1995). Hearing the difference: Theorizing connection. Hypatia, 10(2), 120–127.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.1995.tb01373.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Gilligan, C. (2014). Moral injury and the ethic of care: Reframing the conversation about differences. Journal of Social Philosophy, 45(1), 89–106.  https://doi.org/10.1111/josp.12050.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Graeber, D. (2015). Radical alterity is just another way of saying “reality” a reply to Eduardo Viveiros de Castro. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 5(2), 1–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Grande, S. (2003). Whitestream feminism and the colonialist project: A review of contemporary feminist pedagogy and praxis. Educational Theory, 53(3), 329–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Green, G., Barbour, R. S., Barnard, M., & Kitzinger, J. (1993). “Who wears the trousers?”: Sexual harassment in research settings. Women’s Studies International Forum. Elsevier, 16(6), 627–637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Habermas, J. (1971). Knowledge and human interests (trans: J. Shapiro). London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  45. Habermas, J. (1996). Between facts and norms: Contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy (trans: W. Rehg). Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  46. Habu, J., Fawcett, C., & Matsunaga, J. M. (2008). Evaluating multiple narratives: Beyond nationalist, colonialist, imperialist archaeologies. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Hanen, M., & Kelley, J. (1989). Inference to the best explanation in archaeology. In V. Pinsky & A. Wylie (Eds.), Critical traditions in contemporary archaeology (pp. 14–17). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Harding, S. (1986). The science question in feminism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Harding, S. (1995). “Strong objectivity”: A response to the new objectivity question. Synthese, 104(3), 331–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Harris, O. J., & Sørensen, T. F. (2010). Rethinking emotion and material culture. Archaeological Dialogues, 17(2), 145–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Hays-Gilpin, K. (2000). Feminist scholarship in archaeology. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 571(1), 89–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Hennessy, K., Lyons, N., Loring, S., Arnold, C., Joe, M., Elias, A., et al. (2013). The inuvialuit living history project: Digital return as the forging of relationships between institutions, people, and data. Museum Anthropology Review, 7(1–2), 44–73.Google Scholar
  53. Hodgetts, L., Supernant, K., Lyons, N., & Welch, J. R. (2020). #MeToo and more: Preliminary results of the equity and diversity in Canadian Archaeology Survey. Canadian Journal of Archaeology.Google Scholar
  54. Hogg, E. A., Welch, J. R., & Ferris, N. (2017). Full spectrum archaeology. Archaeologies, 13(1), 175–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Holbraad, M., Pedersen, M. A., & de Castro, E. V. (2014). The Politics of Ontology: Anthropological Positions. Theorizing the Contemporary, Fieldsights, January 13. https://culanth.org/fieldsights/the-politics-of-ontology-anthropological-positions.
  56. Holtorf, C. (2010, August). Meta-stories of archaeology. World Archaeology, 42, 381–393.Google Scholar
  57. Holtorf, C. (2013). On pastness: a reconsideration of materiality in archaeological object authenticity. Anthropological Quarterly, 427–443.Google Scholar
  58. Kehoe, A. B., & Schmidt, P. R. (2017). Introduction: Expanding our knowledge by listening. The SAA Archaeological Record, 17(4), 15–19.Google Scholar
  59. Kelley, J., & Hanen, M. (1988). Archaeology and the methodology of science. Albequerque: University of New Mexico Press.Google Scholar
  60. Kimmerer, R. W. (2011). Restoration and reciprocity: The contributions of traditional ecological knowledge. In Human dimensions of ecological restoration (pp. 257–276). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Kimmerer, R. W. (2013). Braiding sweetgrass: Indigenous wisdom, scientific knowledge and the teachings of plants. Minneapolis: Milkweed Editions.Google Scholar
  62. Koggel, C., & Orme, J. (2010). Care ethics: New theories and applications. New York: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  63. Larrabee, M. J. (2016). An ethic of care: Feminist and interdisciplinary perspectives. Routledge.Google Scholar
  64. Leone, M. P. (2010). Critical historical archaeology. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  65. Leone, M. P., Potter, P. B., Jr., Shackel, P. A., Blakey, M. L., Bradley, R., Durrans, B., et al. (1987). Toward a critical archaeology. Current Anthropology, 28(3), 283–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Lertzman, K. (2009). The paradigm of management, management systems, and resource stewardship. Journal of Ethnobiology, 29(2), 339–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Lyons, N. (2013). Where the wind blows us: Practicing critical community archaeology in the Canadian North. Tuscon: University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
  68. Lyons, N., Dawson, P., Walls, M., Uluadluak, D., Angalik, L., Kalluak, M., et al. (2010). Person, place, memory, thing: How Inuit Elders are informing archaeological practice in the Canadian North. Canadian Journal of Archaeology, 34(1), 1–31.Google Scholar
  69. Lyons, N., Hoffmann, T., Miller, D., Huddlestan, S., Leon, R., & Squires, K. (2018). Katzie & the Wapato: An archaeological love story. Archaeologies, 14, 7–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Lyons, N., Schaepe, D. M., Hennessy, K., Blake, M., Pennier, C., Welch, J. R., et al. (2016). Sharing deep history as digital knowledge: An ontology of the Sq’ewlets website project. Journal of Social Archaeology, 16(3), 359–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Lyons, N., Supernant, K., & Welch, J. R. (2019). What are the prospects for an archaeology of the heart? SAA Archaeological Record, 19(2), 6–9.Google Scholar
  72. Marshall, Y. (2002). What is community archaeology? World Archaeology, 34(2), 211–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. McGuire, R. H. (1992). Archeology and the First Americans. American Anthropologist, 94(4), 816–836.Google Scholar
  74. Mihesuah, D. A. (1996). American Indians, anthropologists, pothunters, and repatriation: Ethical, religious, and political differences. American Indian Quarterly, 20(2), 229–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Murphy, E. M. (2011). Children’s burial grounds in Ireland (Cillini) and parental emotions toward infant death. International Journal of Historical Archaeology, 15(3), 409–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Naumann, A. (2017). Doing your heart’s work. SAA Archaeological Record, 17(3), 26–28.Google Scholar
  77. Nelson, R. G., Rutherford, J. N., Hinde, K., & Clancy, K. B. (2017). Signaling safety: Characterizing fieldwork experiences and their implications for career trajectories. American Anthropologist, 119(4), 710–722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Nicholas, G. P., & Andrews, T. D. (1997). At a Crossroads: Archaeology and First Peoples in Canada. Vancouver: Simon Fraser University.Google Scholar
  79. Oleson, V. (2005). Early millennial feminist qualitative research: Challenges and contours. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research (pp. 235–278). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  80. Palmer, P. J. (2009). A hidden wholeness: The journey toward an undivided life. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  81. Palmer, P. J. (2017). The courage to teach: Exploring the inner landscape of a teacher's life. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  82. Palmer, P. J., Zajonc, A., & Scribner, M. (2010). The heart of higher education: A call to renewal. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  83. Perry, S. (2018). EMOTIVE: Storytelling for cultural heritage. http://emotiveproject.eu/. Accessed 6 Apr 2018.
  84. Petrucka, P. M., Bickford, D., Bassendowski, S., Goodwill, W., Wajunta, C., Yuzicappi, B., et al. (2016). Positive leadership, legacy, lifestyles, attitudes, and activities for Aboriginal youth: A wise practices approach for positive Aboriginal youth futures. International Journal of Indigenous Health, 11(1), 177–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Piccini, A., & Schaepe, D. M. (2014). The messy business of archaeology as participatory local knowledge: A conversation between the Stó:lō Nation and Knowle West. Canadian Journal of Archaeology, 38(2), 466–495. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43487310.Google Scholar
  86. Rakel, D. (2012). Integrative medicine e-book: Expert consult (Premium edn.) Amsterdam: Elsevier Health Sciences.Google Scholar
  87. Rasmussen, M., Sikora, M., Albrechtsen, A., Korneliussen, T. S., Moreno-Mayar, J. V., Poznik, G. D., et al. (2015). The ancestry and affiliations of Kennewick Man. Nature, 523(7561), 455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Rigney, L. I. (2003). The First Perspective: Culturally safe research practices on or with Indigenous Peoples. In T. Peck, E. Siegfried, & G. Oetelaar (Eds.), Indigenous People and archaeology: Honouring the past, discussing the present, building the future (pp. 226–244). Calgary: University of Calgary Archaeological Association.Google Scholar
  89. Rizvi, U. Z. (2008). Conclusion: Archaeological futures and the postcolonial critique. In M. Liebmann & U. Z. Rizvi (Eds.), Archaeology and the postcolonial critique (pp. 197–203). New York: Altamira.Google Scholar
  90. Rose, H. (1983). Hand, brain, and heart: A feminist epistemology for the natural sciences. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 9(1), 73–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Schaepe, D. M., Angelbeck, B., Snook, D., & Welch, J. R. (2017). Archaeology as therapy: Connecting belongings, knowledge, time, place, and well-being. Current Anthropology, 58(4), 502–533.  https://doi.org/10.1086/692985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Schaepe, D. M., Lyons, N., Chan, A. S., Phillips, A., & Hennessy, K. (in press). The Sq’éwlets Youth Origins Experience: Providing Tangible and Intangible Experiences of Ancestral Places and Belongings in Supporting Wellness among Indigenous Youth and Community. In Material Connections: Exploring the role of objects in learning and wellbeing, edited by T. Kador and H. Chatterjee. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  93. Schmidt, P. R., & Patterson, T. C. (1995). Making alternative histories: the practice of archaeology and history in non-Western settings. Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research Press.Google Scholar
  94. Schmidt, P. R., & Kehoe, A. B. (2019). Archaeologies of Listening. Gainsville, FL: University Press of Florida.Google Scholar
  95. Shanks, M., & Tilley, C. Y. (1987). Social theory and archaeology. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  96. Simpson, A. (2014). Mohawk interruptus: Political life across the borders of settler states. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Smith, & Wobst. (2005). Indigenous archaeologies: Decolonizing theory and practice. London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  98. Supernant, K. (2018a). ‘Archaeology of the Métis’ S. Silliman historical archaeology Oxford Handbook online. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  99. Supernant, K. (2018b). Reconciling the past for the future: The next 50 years of Canadian archaeology in the post-TRC era. Canadian Journal of Archaeology, 42(1), 144–153.Google Scholar
  100. Supernant, K., & Warrick, G. (2014). Challenges to critical community-based archaeological practice in Canada. Canadian Journal of Archaeology, 38(2), 563–591.Google Scholar
  101. Tarlow, S. (2012). The archaeology of emotion and affect. Annual Review of Anthropology, 41, 169–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Tarlow, S., Averill, J. R., Campbell, F., Hansson, J., Cowgill, G. L., Harré, R., et al. (2000). Emotion in archaeology. Current Anthropology, 41(5), 713–746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Todd, Z. (2016). An Indigenous feminist’s take on the ontological turn: ‘Ontology’is just another word for colonialism. Journal of Historical Sociology, 29(1), 4–22.Google Scholar
  104. Trigger, B. G. (1980). Archaeology and the image of the American Indian. American Antiquity, 45, 662–676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Trigger, B. G. (1984). Alternative archaeologies: Nationalist, colonialist, imperialist. Man, 19(3), 355–370. http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublication?journalCode=man.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Trigger, B. G. (2006). A history of archaeological thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Trigger, B. G., Series, N., & Sep, N. (1984). Alternative archaeologies: Nationalist, colonialist, imperialist. Man, 19(3), 355–370. http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublication?journalCode=man.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Tronto, J. C. (1993). Moral boundaries: A political argument for an ethic of care. London: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  109. Tubb, K. W. (2006). Artifacts and emotion. In N. Brodie, M. M. Kersel, C. Luke, & K. W. Tubb (Eds.), Archaeology, cultural heritage, and the antiquities trade (pp. 284–302). Gainsville: University of Florida Press.Google Scholar
  110. Tuck, E., & Yang, K. W. (2012). Decolonization is not a metaphor. Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education & Society, 1(1).Google Scholar
  111. Tuhiwai Smith, L. (1999). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples. London: Zed Books Limited.Google Scholar
  112. Tuhiwai Smith, L. (2013). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples. London: Zed Books Ltd.Google Scholar
  113. Turner, N. J. (2008). The Earth’s Blanket: Traditional teachings for sustainable living. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
  114. Turner, N. J. (2020) Plants, People, and Places: The Roles of Ethnobotany and Ethnoecology in Indigenous Peoples’ Land Rights in Canada and Beyond. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.Google Scholar
  115. United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. (2008). United Nations: New York.Google Scholar
  116. Walde, D., & Willows, N. D. (1991). 1989 ‘The Archaeology of Gender: Proceedings of the twenty-second annual conference of the Chacmool Archaeological Association of the University of Calgary’ D. Walde, & N. D. Willows Chacmool. Calgary: University of Calgary Archaeological Association.Google Scholar
  117. Watkins, J. (2003). Beyond the margin: American Indians, First Nations, and Archaeology in North America. American Antiquity, 68(2), 273–285.  https://doi.org/10.2307/3557080.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Watkins, J. (2004). Becoming American or becoming Indian? NAGPRA, Kennewick and cultural affiliation. Journal of Social Archaeology, 4(1), 60–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Watkins, J. (2005). Through wary eyes: Indigenous perspectives on archaeology. Annual Review of Anthropology, 34, 429–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Watson, J. (2009). Caring science and human caring theory: Transforming personal and professional practices of nursing and health care. Journal of Health and Human Services Administration, 31, 466–482.Google Scholar
  121. Watts, V. (2013). Indigenous place-thought and agency amongst humans and non humans (First Woman and Sky Woman go on a European world tour!). Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education & Society, 2(1), 20–34.Google Scholar
  122. Wilson, S. (2008). Research is ceremony: Indigenous research methods. Black Point: Fernwood Publishing.Google Scholar
  123. Wylie, A. (1992). Rethinking the quincentennial: consequences for past and present. American Antiquity, 591–594.Google Scholar
  124. Wylie, A. (1997). The engendering of archaeology: Refiguring feminist science studies. Osiris, 12, 80–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. Wylie, A. (2000). Questions of evidence, legitimacy, and the (dis)unity of science. American Antiquity, 65(2), 227–237.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2694057.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. Wylie, A. (2002). Archaeological cables and tacking: Beyond objectivism and relativism. In A. Wylie (Ed.), Thinking from things: Essays in the philosophy of archaeology (pp. 161–167). Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  127. Wylie, A. (2013). Why Standpoint Matters. In S. Harding & R. Figueroa (Eds.), Science and other cultures: Issues in philosophies of science and technology (pp. 34–56). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  128. Zimmerman, L. J. (2005). First, be humble: Working with Indigenous Peoples and other descendant communities. In C. Smith & H. M. Wobst (Eds.), Indigenous archaeologies: Decolonizing theory and practice (pp. 301–314). London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Ursus Heritage Consulting and Department of ArchaeologySimon Fraser UniversityColdstreamCanada
  2. 2.Department of Anthropology, University of AlbertaEdmontonCanada

Personalised recommendations