Advertisement

Organization of Care for Patients Treated by Deep Brain Stimulation

  • Rianne A. J. Esselink
  • Mark L. KuijfEmail author
Chapter
  • 13 Downloads

Abstract

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a complex multidisciplinary treatment option for specific movement and psychiatric disorders. A successful DBS procedure and outcome for patients depend on many factors. Clear organization of patient-centered care is of great importance. Tasks and responsibilities of each team member should be clear. Team members should be well trained for their job. Communication within the team should be fast and easy, as should the communication with patients and their caregivers. Patients’ and caregivers’ counseling is of great importance in many ways, especially for realistic expectations. Therefore, a comprehensive multidisciplinary protocol of the whole process from indicating and counseling patients to screening, surgery, and postoperative care is necessary. Tasks and responsibilities of all those involved in the treatment should be stated clearly in this protocol.

Finally, DBS centers should have the will to innovate and invest in the continuous training of the team members and material deployment.

Keywords

Organization of care Multidisciplinary team 

References

  1. Baker KB, Nyenhuis JA, Hrdlicka G, et al. Neurostimulation systems: assessment of magnetic field interactions associated with 1.5- and 3-Tesla MR systems. Magn Reson Imaging. 2005;21:72–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bhatia R, Dalton A, Richards M, et al. The incidence of deep brain stimulator hardware infection: the effect of change in antibiotic prophylaxis regimen and review of the literature. Br J Neurosurg. 2001;25:625–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Elwyn G, Frosch D, Thomson R, et al. Shared decision making: a model for clinical practice. J Gen Intern Med. 2012;27:1361–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Farris S, Giroux M. Retrospective review of factors leading to dissatisfaction with subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation during long-term management. Surg Neurol Int. 2013;4:69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gorgulho A, De Salles AA, Frighetto L, Behnke E. Incidence of hemorrhage associated with electrophysiological studies performed using macroelectrodes and microelectrodes in functional neurosurgery. J Neurosurg. 2005;102:888–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Henderson JM, Tkach J, Phillips M, et al. Permanent neurological deficit related to magnetic resonance imaging in a patient with implanted deep brain stimulation electrodes for Parkinson’s disease: case report. Neurosurgery. 2005;57:E1063.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Okun MS, Tagliati M, Pourfar M, et al. Management of referred deep brain stimulation failures: a retrospective analysis from 2 movement disorders centers. Arch Neurol. 2005;62:1250–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Rezai AR, Baker KB, Tkach JA, et al. Is magnetic resonance imaging safe for patients with neurostimulation systems used for deep brain stimulation? Neurosurgery. 2005;57:1056–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Neurology, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and BehaviourRadboud University Medical CenterNijmegenThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Department of NeurologyMaastricht University Medical CenterMaastrichtThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations