Evaluating Quality in Tourism Destination Websites of Peloponnese

  • Kourtesopoulou Anna
  • Nikolakakou Christina
  • Moustakarias Nikos
  • Grapsa Theodoula
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics book series (SPBE)


Tourism destination websites contribute significantly to the competitiveness of a tourism destination. Websites and mobile technology are their main digital marketing contributors by providing tailored and up-to-date information. Since limited research has been done about non-commercial travel websites, this study aims to identify whether selected Peloponnese destination websites apply integrated quality as a mean to raise their brand competitiveness.

Methods: A content analysis was performed in order to assess the destination websites quality performance. The used website quality assessment consists of a set of 42 parameters covering content and usability characteristics. The selected tourist destination websites were chosen according to two criteria: (1) their ability to provide at least two options in language Greek and English and (2) their main destination will be either Peloponnese or a region of it.

The results: The analysis of the data revealed that tourism destination websites average performance level was weak. In total they seemed to perform better in content than in usability. According to the result, leading quality indicators of destination websites found to be the audience, the page load time and advertising. However, there is still room for improvements with relation to information accuracy, access, navigation as well as interactivity.

Conclusions: As indicated by the results, there are elements to the selected destination websites that may be improved targeting an excellence quality performance. The destination websites will keep on playing a basic role in tourism communication, thus quality excellence should ensure the optimization of tourist experience and increase the intention for visiting these destinations.


Tourism destination websites Peloponnese region Brand destination Quality Websites Content Usability Assessment 

JEL Classification

L8 Z3 


  1. Anderson, P. F., Allee, N., Grove, S., & Hill, S. (1999). Web site evaluation checklist. Retrieved from University of Michigan, personal website of P.F. Anderson: Retrieved from
  2. Bellman, S., Johnson, E., Lohse, G., & Mandel, N. (2006). Designing marketplaces of the artificial with consumers in mind: Four approaches to understanding consumer behaviour in electronic environments. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 20(1), 21–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Breiman, J. H., Olshen, L., Friedman, R. A., & Stone, C. J. (1984). Classification and regression trees. Wadsworth International Group.Google Scholar
  4. Bremner, C. (2017). What the data tells us about travel and tourism in 2018. Euromonitor international. Retrieved from
  5. Brida, J. G., Pulina, M., Riaño, E. M. M., & Zapata-Aguirre, S. (2010). A classification and regression tree (CART) to analyse cruisers’ expenditure pattern and perception in a port of call (Working paper).Google Scholar
  6. Buonincontri, P., & Micera, R. (2016). The experience co-creation in smart tourism destinations: A multiple case analysis of European destinations. Information Technology & Tourism, 16(3), 285–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cavia, J. F., Rovira, C., Luque, P. D., & Cavaller, V. (2014). Web quality index WQI for official tourist destination websites. Proposal for an assessment system. Tourism Management Perspectives, 9, 5–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Craigwell, R., Worrell, D., & Smith, S. (2006). The competitiveness of selected Caribbean tourism markets. Proceedings of annual review seminar of the central Bank of Barbados. Barbados: Bridgetown.Google Scholar
  9. Delone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (2003). The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: A ten-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4), 9–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dion, C. P., & Woodside, A. G. (2010). Usefulness of government and private destination websites. In A. G. Woodside (Ed.), Tourism-marketing performance metrics and usefulness auditing of destination websites. Advances in culture, tourism and hospitality research (Vol. 4, pp. 69–137). Bingley: Emerald.Google Scholar
  11. Dupeyras, A., & MacCallum, N. (2013). Indicators for measuring competitiveness in tourism: A guidance document (OECD Tourism Papers, 2013/02). OECD. Retrieved from
  12. Eisenberg, B., & Quarto-vonTivadar, J. (2009). Always be testing: The complete guide to Google website optimizer. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  13. Fernández-Cavia, J., Díaz-Luque, P., Huertas, A., Rovira, C., Pedraza-Jimenez, R., Sicilia, M., et al. (2013). Destination brands and website evaluation: A research methodology. Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, 68, 622–638.Google Scholar
  14. Gretzel, U. (2018). From smart destinations to smart tourism regions. Investigaciones Regionales, 42, 171–184.Google Scholar
  15. Gretzel, U., Reino, S., Kopera, S., & Koo, C. (2015). Smart tourism challenges. Journal of Tourism, 16(1), 41–47.Google Scholar
  16. Groth, A., & Haslwanter, D. (2015). Perceived usability, attractiveness and intuitiveness of responsive mobile tourism websites: A user experience study. In Information and communication technologies in tourism (pp. 593–606). Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
  17. Ip, C., Law, R., & Lee, H. A. (2011). A review of website evaluation studies in the tourism and hospitality fields from 1996 to 2009. International Journal of Tourism Research, 13(3), 234–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kiráľová, A., & Pavlíčeka, A. (2015). Development of social media strategies in tourism destination. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 175, 358–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lehto, X. Y., Kim, D. Y., & Morrison, A. M. (2006). The effect of prior destination experience on online information search behavior. Tourism and Hospitality Research, 6(2), 160–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lin, C., Morais, D., Kersetter, D., & Hou, J. (2007). Examining the role of cognitive and affective image in predicting choice across natural, developed, and theme-park destinations. Journal of Travel Research, 46, 183–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lopez, M. T., Valarez, K., & Altamirano, V. (2016). Collaborative tourism communication 2.0: Promotion advertising and interactivity in government tourism websites in Latin America. Social Communication, 249–271.Google Scholar
  22. Nikolakakou, C. D., Grapsa, T. N., Nikas, I. A., & Androulakis, G. S. (2015). A sequential approach for unconstrained optimization via a partitioning technique. International Journal of Computer Mathematics, 92(4), 722–741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Park, Y. A., & Gretzel, U. (2007). Success factors for destination marketing web sites: A qualitative meta-analysis. Journal of Travel Research, 46(1), 46–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Pitombo, C., Sousa, A., & Filipe, L. (2009). Classification and regression tree, principal components analysis and multiple linear regression to summarize data and understand travel behavior. Transportation Letters, 1(4), 295–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Qi, S., Law, R., & Buhalis, D. (2008). Usability of Chinese destination management organization websites. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 25(2), 182–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rougeris, C., & Androulakis, G. S. (2008). An examination of factors affecting bidders’ choice in electronic auctions. In Proceedings of international multiconference on computer science and information technology (pp. 407–413). IEEE.Google Scholar
  27. Tang, L., & Jang, S. (2008). Tourism information trust as a bridge between information value and satisfaction: An exploratory study. Tourism Analysis, 13(5/6), 565–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Tourism Economics. (2017). The impact of online content on European tourism: An update and extension of prior analysis. Oxford Economics Company, 1–61.Google Scholar
  29. Wang, D., Li, X., & Li, Y. (2013). China’s “smart tourism destination” initiative: A taste of the service-dominant logic. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management, 2(2), 59–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. World Tourism Organisation and the European Travel Commission. (2008). Handbook on EMarketing for tourism destination. Madrid: Europe-World Tourism Organization.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Xiang, Z., Pan, B., Law, R., & Fesenmaier, D. R. (2010). Assessing the visibility of destination marketing organizations in Google: A case study of convention and visitor bureau websites in the United States. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 27(7), 694–707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Zhang, L. Y., Li, N., & Liu, M. (2012). On the basic concept of smarter tourism and its theoretical system. Tour Tribune, 27(5), 66–73.Google Scholar
  33. Zhou, Q., & DeSantis, R. (2005). Usability issues in city tourism website design: A content analysis. In IPCC 2005. Proceedings of international professional communication conference (pp. 789–796). IEEE.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kourtesopoulou Anna
    • 1
  • Nikolakakou Christina
    • 2
  • Moustakarias Nikos
    • 3
  • Grapsa Theodoula
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Sport Organization and ManagementUniversity of PeloponneseSpartaGreece
  2. 2.Department of MathematicsUniversity of PatrasPatrasGreece
  3. 3.Department of Computer ScienceHellenic Open UniversityPatrasGreece

Personalised recommendations