Experimental Usage of AI Brain-Computer Interfaces: Computerized Errors, Side-Effects, and Alteration of Personality
- 7 Downloads
The US Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) is currently funding experimental trials testing in human novel medical brain implants operated by Artificial Intelligence (AI). The purpose of this chapter is to explore some ethical issues related to the experimental use of these invasive AI-controlled brain devices, in particular, deleterious phenomenological effects these devices may have on a patient’s personality and/or sense of self (i.e. patients suffering from postoperative self-estrangement despite symptom reductions). The evolution of these devices from open-looped stimulation to closed-loop personalized AI-controlled stimulation raises many safety concerns that may exacerbate these ethical issues. This new AI-controlled approach is unlike previous open-loop methods (i.e. traditional deep brain stimulation); the AI-tailored made frequency stimulation schedule depends on the computational measurement of patients’ brain states which fluctuates from patient to patient. Hence no universal safety standard and the potential for computational error resulting in plausible deleterious effects on a patient’s personality. The aim of this chapter is to explore how closed-loop stimulation undermines safety standards and results in skewed risk assessments for complex phenomenon such as a patient’s personality, but as well autonomy.
Frederic Gilbert is supported by a grant from the Australian Research Council (DECRA award Project Number DE150101390).
- Arlotti, Mattia, Lorenzo Rossi, Manuela Rosa, Sara Marceglia, and Alberto Priori. 2016. An external portable device for adaptive deep brain stimulation (aDBS) clinical research in advanced Parkinson’s disease. Medical Engineering & Physics 38 (5): 498–505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medengphy.2016.02.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Beauchamp, Tom L., and James F. Childress. 2013. Principles of biomedical ethics. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Bouton, Chad E., Ammar Shaikhouni, Nicholas V. Annetta, Marcia A. Bockbrader, David A. Friedenberg, Dylan M. Nielson, Gaurav Sharma, et al. 2016. Restoring cortical control of functional movement in a human with quadriplegia. Nature 533 (7602): 247–250. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature17435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Burwell, Sarah, Matthew Sample, and Eric Racine. 2017. Ethical aspects of brain computer interfaces: a scoping review. BMC Medical Ethics 18 (1).Google Scholar
- Downey, John E., Lucas Brane, Robert A. Gaunt, Elizabeth C. Tyler-Kabara, Michael L. Boninger, and Jennifer L. Collinger. 2017. Motor cortical activity changes during neuroprosthetic-controlled object interaction. Scientific Reports 7 (1).Google Scholar
- Ezzyat, Youssef, Paul A. Wanda, Deborah F. Levy, Allison Kadel, Ada Aka, Isaac Pedisich, Michael R. Sperling, et al. 2018. Closed-loop stimulation of temporal cortex rescues functional networks and improves memory. Nature Communications 9 (1): 365. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-02753-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Fins, Joseph J., Helen S. Mayberg, Bart Nuttin, Cynthia S. Kubu, Thorsten Galert, Volker Sturm, Katja Stoppenbrink, Reinhard Merkel, and Thomas E. Schlaepfer. 2011. Misuse of the FDA’s humanitarian device exemption in deep brain stimulation for obsessive-compulsive disorder. Health Affairs (Project Hope) 30 (2): 302–311. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Fisher, Robert, Vicenta Salanova, Thomas Witt, Robert Worth, Thomas Henry, Robert Gross, Kalarickal Oommen, et al. 2010. Electrical stimulation of the anterior nucleus of thalamus for treatment of refractory epilepsy. Epilepsia 51 (5): 899–908. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1528-1167.2010.02536.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- ———. 2015b. Are predictive brain implants an indispensable feature of autonomy? Bioethica Forum 8: 121–127.Google Scholar
- ———. 2018. Deep brain stimulation: Inducing self-estrangement. Neuroethics 11: 157–165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12152-017-9334-7.
- Gilbert, Frederic. Brown, Dasgupta, Martens, Klein, Goering, An Instrument to Capture the Phenomenology of Implantable Brain Device Use. 2019c. Neuroethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12152-019-09422-7.
- Gilbert, Frederic, John Noel M. Viaña, and Christian Ineichen. 2018b. Deflating the “DBS caused personality changes” bubble. Neuroethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12152-018-9373-8.
- Gilbert, F., Mark Cook, Terrence O’Brien, and Judy Illes. 2019a. Embodiment and estrangement: Results from a first-in-human ‘Intelligent BCI’ trial. Science and Engineering Ethics, November: 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-017-0001-5.
- Gilbert, Frederic. C. Pham, Jnm Viaña, and W. Gillam. 2019b. Increasing brain-computer interface media depictions: pressing ethical concerns. Brain-Computer Interfaces 6 (3): 49–70.Google Scholar
- Holtzheimer, Paul E., and Helen S. Mayberg. 2011. Deep Brain Stimulation for Psychiatric Disorders. Annual Review of Neuroscience 34 (1): 289–307.Google Scholar
- Krucoff, Max O., Shervin Rahimpour, Marc W. Slutzky, V. Reggie Edgerton, and Dennis A. Turner. 2016. Enhancing nervous system recovery through neurobiologics, neural interface training, and neurorehabilitation. Frontiers in Neuroscience 10: 584. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2016.00584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Leykin, Yan, Paul P. Christopher, Paul E. Holtzheimer, Paul S. Appelbaum, Helen S. Mayberg, Sarah H. Lisanby, and Laura B. Dunn. 2011. Participants’ perceptions of deep brain stimulation research for treatment-resistant depression: Risks, benefits, and therapeutic misconception. AJOB Primary Research 2 (4): 33–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/21507716.2011.627579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Pugh, Jonathan, Laurie Pycroft, Hannah Maslen, Tipu Aziz, and Julian Savulescu. Evidence-Based Neuroethics, Deep Brain Stimulation and Personality - Deflating, but not Bursting, the Bubble. Neuroethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12152-018-9392-5.
- Rao, Rajesh P.N. 2013. Brain-Computer Interfacing: An Introduction. 1st ed. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Schechtman, Marya. 2007. The constitution of selves. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
- Stich, Stephen P., and Ted A. Warfield. 2008. The Blackwell guide to philosophy of mind. Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Talan, Jamie. 2014. DARPA. Neurology Today 14 (20):8–10Google Scholar
- US Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Health. Parkinson’s disease and agent orange – Public health. General Information. www.publichealth.va.gov/exposures/agentorange/conditions/parkinsonsdisease.asp. Accessed 12 Aug 2018.
- Viaña, John Noel M., James C. Vickers, Mark J. Cook, and Frederic Gilbert. 2017b. Currents of memory: Recent progress, translational challenges, and ethical considerations in fornix deep brain stimulation trials for Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiology of Aging 56 (August): 202–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2017.03.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Vranic, Andrej, and Gilbert Frederic, 2014. Prognostic implication of preoperative behavior changes in patients with primary high-grade Meningiomas. The Scientific World Journal 2014: 398295, 5 pages https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/398295.