Advertisement

Study on the Influence of Different Preheating Conditions on Carbon Structure of 1/3 Coking Coal

  • Lin-Yang Zhang
  • Jing-Song WangEmail author
  • Qing-Guo Xue
  • Hai-Bin Zuo
  • Xue-Feng She
  • Guang Wang
Conference paper
  • 48 Downloads
Part of the The Minerals, Metals & Materials Series book series (MMMS)

Abstract

The 1/3 coking coal, a kind of typical coking coal in the cokemaking process, was used as raw materials in this study. Coal materials were preheated to 200 °C, 300 °C, 350 °C, 380 °C, 400 ℃, and 420 °C, respectively, by two ways, one way was putting them at room temperature in a heating furnace and let their temperature rise with the heating of furnace (slow preheating), another way was heating coal with hot gas heated to a certain temperature (quick preheating). The heating rate of coal was about 2–4°C/min in the former way and ranged from 14.40 to 28.44 °C/min in a second way. The Raman spectra of coal chars over the range of 800–1800 cm−1 were curve-fitted with 1 structural ordered band (G) and 4 defect bands (D1, D2, D3, D4). In temperature range of 200–350 °C, the degree of organization of coal chars raised with increasing temperature and the quick preheating made the carbon structure of coal more disordered than those of raw coal and slow preheated coal chars. When preheated to 380–420 °C, the plastic mass emerged in coal bed and the degree of organization of samples under all preheating conditions increased overall.

Keywords

Coking coal Hot gas Heating rate Preheating conditions Raman spectroscopy 

References

  1. 1.
    Mochizuki Y, Ono Y, Tsubouchi N (2019) Evolution profile of gases during coal carbonization and relationship between their amounts and the fluidity or coke strength. Fuel 237:735–744CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lin W, Feng Y, Zhang X (2015) Numerical study of volatiles production, fluid flow and heat transfer in coke ovens. Appl Therm Eng 81:353–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Nishioka K, Oshima H, Sugiyama I, Fujikawa H (2004) Development of the innovative cokemaking process (SCOPE21) for the 21st century. Tetsu-to-Hagane 90(9):614–619CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Nomura S, Arima T, Kato K (2004) Coal blending theory for dry coal charging process. Fuel 83:1771–1776CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kato K, Nomura S (2009) Coal pre-treating technologies for improving coke quality. In: Paper presented at the fifth international congress on the science and technology of ironmaking, 19–23 Oct 2009. ShanghaiGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kubota Y, Arima T, Kato K, Matsuura M, Nakai H, Sasaki M, Sugiyama I (2004) Evaluation of coke strength and coke size in the SCOPE21 process. Tetsu-to-Hagane 90(9):686–693CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Matsuura M, Sasaki M, Saito K, Kato K, Komaki I (2003) Effects of rapid preheating on coal structure and coke strength. Tetsu-to-Hagane 89(5):565–572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Matsuura M, Sasaki M, Kato K, Nakashima Y (2004) Effects of coal blend type and preheating temperature in coal rapid preheating process on coke strength. Tetsu-to-Hagane 90(9):656–660CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fukada K, Itagaki S, Shimoyama I (2006) Effect of rapid preheating on the caking properties of coals. ISIJ Int 46(11):1603–1609CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Liqiang Y (2013) Research of ultrafine coal in blend coal coking technology. Master’s thesis, Hebei United UniversityGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sadezk A, Muckenhuber H, Grothe H, Niessner R, Poschl U (2005) Raman microspectroscopy of soot and related carbonaceous materials: spectral analysis and structural information. Carbon 43:1731–1742CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sheng C (2007) Char structure characterised by Raman spectroscopy and its correlations with combustion reactivity. Fuel 86:2316–2324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Morga R (2011) Micro-Raman spectroscopy of carbonized semifusinite and fusinite. Int J Coal Geol 87:253–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Morga R, Jelonek I, Kruszewska K (2014) Relationship between coking coal quality and its micro-Raman spectral characteristics. Int J Coal Geol 134–135:17–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Beyssac O, Goffe B, Peritet J-P, Froigneux E, Moreau M, Rouzaud J-N (2003) On the characterization of disordered and heterogeneous carbonaceous materials by Raman spectroscopy. Spectrochimica Acta Part A 59:2267–2276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Morga R, Jelonek I, Kruszewska K, Szulik W (2015) Relationships between quality of coals, resulting cokes, and micro-Raman spectral characteristics of these cokes. Int J Coal Geol 144–145:130–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Li X, Hayashi J, Li C-Z (2006) FT-Raman spectroscopic study of the evolution of char structure during the pyrolysis of a Victorian brown coal. Fuel 85:1700–1707CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Cen K et al (2002) Advanced combustion science. Zhejiang University Press, ZhejiangGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Blair DW, Wendt JOL, Bartok W (1976) Evolution of nitrogen and other species during controlled pyrolysis of coal. In: Paper presented at the 16th symposium (international) combustion, 15–20 Aug 1976. Combustion Institute, Cambridge, MassachusettsGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Juntgen H, Van Heek KH (1968) Gas release from coal as a function of the rate of heating. Fuel 47:103–117Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Van Heek KH, Peter W (1973) Fundamental studies on coal gasification in the utilization of thermal from nuclear high-temperature reactors. J Inst Fuel 46:249–258Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lin-Yang Zhang
    • 1
  • Jing-Song Wang
    • 1
    Email author
  • Qing-Guo Xue
    • 1
  • Hai-Bin Zuo
    • 1
  • Xue-Feng She
    • 1
  • Guang Wang
    • 1
  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Advanced MetallurgyUniversity of Science and Technology BeijingBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations