Preformed Oxide Scale Chemistry and Its Influence on Local Metal Loss During Dual Atmosphere Corrosion

  • Michael Reisert
  • Ashish Aphale
  • Yoed Tsur
  • Prabhakar SinghEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the The Minerals, Metals & Materials Series book series (MMMS)


Stainless steels, commonly used for the fabrication of cell stack and balance-of-plant (BoP) components in intermediate temperature solid oxide electrochemical systems, are subject to simultaneous exposure of a bi-polar oxidizing (cathodic) and reducing (anodic) atmosphere. This exposure condition, often termed “dual atmosphere”, has been shown to induce anomalous, localized corrosion through selective and accelerated oxidation of the base alloy. Ferritic stainless steels are seen as candidate materials for interconnects within electrochemically active cell stacks because of their matching thermal expansion coefficient with contacting ceramic cell components (electrolyte/cathode/anode). The corrosion behavior of a selected ferritic stainless steel has been experimentally examined under dual atmosphere conditions. In comparison, different treatments of the steel were carried out to preform an oxide scale and observed further oxidation behavior in dual atmosphere compared to as-received steel. Scale compositions and morphologies after pretreatment and post- dual atmosphere exposure will be mentioned and discussed. Hypotheses regarding the role of dual atmosphere in enhanced oxidation and the role of pre-treatments for steels used as interconnects will be discussed.


Dual atmosphere Pre-treatment Oxidation Corrosion Ferritic stainless steel 


  1. 1.
    Reisert M, Aphale A, Singh P (2018) Solid oxide electrochemical systems: material degradation processes and novel mitigation approaches. Mater (Basel) 11:2169. Scholar
  2. 2.
    Yang Z, Walker MS, Singh P, Stevenson JW (2003) Anomalous corrosion behavior of stainless steels under SOFC interconnect exposure conditions. Electrochem Solid State Lett 6:B35. Scholar
  3. 3.
    Yang Z, Walker MS, Singh P, Stevenson JW, Norby T (2004) Oxidation behavior of ferritic stainless steels under SOFC interconnect exposure conditions. J Electrochem Soc 151:B669. Scholar
  4. 4.
    Yang Z (2008) Recent advances in metallic interconnects for solid oxide fuel cells. Int Mater Rev 53:39–54. Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mah JCW, Muchtar A, Somalu MR, Ghazali MJ (2017) Metallic interconnects for solid oxide fuel cell: a review on protective coating and deposition techniques. Int J Hydrogen Energy 42:9219–9229. Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bateni R, Wei P, Deng X, Petric A (2007) Spinel coatings for UNS 430 stainless steel interconnects. Surf Coat Tech 201(8):4677–4684. Scholar
  7. 7.
    Yang Z, Xia G-G, Li X-H, Stevenson JW (2007) (Mn, Co)3O4 spinel coatings on ferritic stainless steels for SOFC interconnect applications. Int J Hydrogen Energy 32:3648–3654. Scholar
  8. 8.
    Goebel C, Alnegren P, Faust R, Svensson J, Froitzheim J (2018) The effect of pre-oxidation parameters on the corrosion behavior of AISI 441 in dual atmosphere. Int J Hydrogen Energy 43:14665–14674. Scholar
  9. 9.
    Faust R (2017) Dual atmosphere corrosion of ferritic stainless steel used for solid oxide fuel cell applications. PhD thesis, Chalmers University of TechnologyGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Alnegren P, Sattari M, Svensson JE, Froitzheim J (2016) Severe dual atmosphere effect at 600 ℃ for stainless steel 441. J Power Sources 301:170–178. Scholar

Copyright information

© The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael Reisert
    • 1
  • Ashish Aphale
    • 1
  • Yoed Tsur
    • 2
  • Prabhakar Singh
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Materials Science and EngineeringUniversity of ConnecticutStorrsUSA
  2. 2.Chemical EngineeringTechnion – Israel Institute of TechnologyHaifaIsrael

Personalised recommendations