Advertisement

Coverage Path Planning Optimization for Slopes and Dams Inspection

  • Iago Z. BiundiniEmail author
  • Aurelio G. Melo
  • Milena F. Pinto
  • Guilherme M. Marins
  • Andre L. M. Marcato
  • Leonardo M. Honorio
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 1093)

Abstract

In the last decades, there is a growing in the use of UAVs for inspection applications due to their maneuverability, flexibility, and efficiency. UAVs can be used for regular inspections to verify deformities, reconstruct 3D spaces, and mapping through aerial photogrammetry. An important aspect when inspecting buildings and structures is to cover the entire structure as efficiently as possible. Some applications, such as the inspection of electric power generation facilities, demand security constraints to ensure safety in their big structures like slopes and dams. Those inspections will be repeated regularly to ensure that changes in the structures are not occurring over time. The determination of the optimal path planning for those structures can be quite complex. This is due to the presence of obstacles and safety restrictions, such as high voltage power lines, transformers, and water outlets that will be present and can not be modeled previous to the first inspection. Thus, these initial inspections are performed manually by a skilled operator. However, this first path is performed without considering mission time and optimal trajectory. Therefore, this research work proposes a methodology to maximize coverage inspection trajectories generated manually. The results proved the algorithm capacity of optimizing trajectories performed manually by an operator.

Keywords

Optimized Path Planning Inspection Surface Deformation Analysis Unmanned Aerial Vehicle 

Notes

Acknowledgment

We would like to thank the following Brazilian Agencies UFJF, CAPES, CNPq, INCT– INERGE, ANEEL P & D Program (CPFL Energia) and INESC Brazil.

References

  1. 1.
    Bo, X., Liping, C., Yu, T., Min, X.: College of engineering, china agricultural university; Beijing key laboratory of intelligent equipment technology for agriculture; Beijing research center of intelligent equipment for agriculture;; route planning algorithm and verification based on UAV operation path angle in irregular area. 11 (2015)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Buffi, G., Manciola, P., Grassi, S., Barberini, M., Gambi, A.: Survey of the ridracoli dam: UAV-based photogrammetry and traditional topographic techniques in the inspection of vertical structures. Geomatics Nat. Hazards Risk 8(2), 1562–1579 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Di Franco, C., Buttazzo, G.: Energy-aware coverage path planning of UAVs. In: 2015 IEEE International Conference on Autonomous Robot Systems and Competitions, pp. 111–117. IEEE (2015)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    DJI: Phantom 4 quadcopter. https://www.dji.com/br/phantom-4 (2019). Accessed 06 Sept 2019
  5. 5.
    Shi, Y.: Particle swarm optimization: developments, applications and resources. In: Proceedings of the 2001 Congress on Evolutionary Computation (IEEE Cat. No.01TH8546), vol. 1, pp. 81–86 (2001)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Galceran, E., Carreras, M.: A survey on coverage path planning for robotics. Rob. Auton. Syst. 61(12), 1258–1276 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hayat, S., Yanmaz, E., Brown, T.X., Bettstetter, C.: Multi-objective UAV path planning for search and rescue. In: 2017 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp. 5569–5574. IEEE (2017)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jacob, R., Brodal, G.S.: Dynamic planar convex hull. arXiv preprint arXiv:1902.11169 (2019)
  9. 9.
    Khaloo, A., Lattanzi, D., Jachimowicz, A., Devaney, C.: Utilizing UAV and 3d computer vision for visual inspection of a large gravity dam. Front. Built Environ. 4, 31 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kim, D.H., Hoang, G., Bae, M., Kim, J.W., Yoon, S.M., Yeo, T., Sup, H., Kim, S.: Path tracking control coverage of a mining robot based on exhaustive path planning with exact cell decomposition. In: 2014 14th International Conference on Control, Automation and Systems (ICCAS 2014), pp. 730–735, October 2014Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kostiv, O., Demydov, I., Makarenko, A., Tverdohlib, M.: Metaheuristics in cloud platform traffic engineering. In: 2018 14th International Conference on Advanced Trends in Radioelecrtronics, Telecommunications and Computer Engineering (TCSET), pp. 533–537, February 2018Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Meyer, J., Sendobry, A., Kohlbrecher, S., Klingauf, U., von Stryk, O.: Comprehensive simulation of quadrotor uavs using ros and gazebo. In: 3rd International Conference on Simulation, Modeling and Programming for Autonomous Robots (SIMPAR) (2012)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Miao, X., Lee, J., Kang, B.: Scalable coverage path planning for cleaning robots using rectangular map decomposition on large environments. IEEE Access 6, 38200–38215 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    de la Puente, P., Rodriguez-Losada, D., Valero, A., Matia, F.: 3d feature based mapping towards mobile robots’ enhanced performance in rescue missions. In: 2009 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pp. 1138–1143. IEEE (2009)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Schonberger, J.L., Frahm, J.M.: Structure-from-motion revisited. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 4104–4113 (2016)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Song, Y.S., Arshad, M.R.: Coverage path planning for underwater pole inspection using an autonomous underwater vehicle. In: 2016 IEEE International Conference on Automatic Control and Intelligent Systems (I2CACIS), pp. 230–235, October 2016Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Yang, X.S.: A new metaheuristic bat-inspired algorithm. In: González, J.R., Pelta, D.A., Cruz, C., Terrazas, G., Krasnogor, N. (eds.) Nature Inspired Cooperative Strategies for Optimization (NICSO 2010), Studies in Computational Intelligence (SCI), vol. 284, pp. 65–74. Springer, Berlin, Germany (2010). chap. 6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Yang, X.S., Hossein Gandomi, A.: Bat algorithm: a novel approach for global engineering optimization. Eng. Comput. 29(5), 464–483 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Yang, X.S., Karamanoglu, M., Fong, S.: Bat algorithm for topology optimization in microelectronic applications. In: The First International Conference on Future Generation Communication Technologies, pp. 150–155. IEEE (2012)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Iago Z. Biundini
    • 1
    Email author
  • Aurelio G. Melo
    • 1
  • Milena F. Pinto
    • 2
  • Guilherme M. Marins
    • 1
  • Andre L. M. Marcato
    • 1
  • Leonardo M. Honorio
    • 1
  1. 1.Federal University of Juiz de ForaJuiz de ForaBrazil
  2. 2.Federal Center for Technological Education of Rio de JaneiroRio de JaneiroBrazil

Personalised recommendations