Advertisement

Relationships Among National Tourist Destination Arrivals, Effective Governance, Environmental Performance, and Human Development

  • Barry A. Friedman
  • Merve Yanar GürceEmail author
Conference paper
  • 37 Downloads
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics book series (SPBE)

Abstract

Competition among destinations for tourism steadily increased over the past few decades. Extant literature emphasizes tourist travel motivation, destination choice, decision making, and trends such as responsible tourism, medical tourism, and ecotourism. This study adds value with an empirical macro national approach that investigated relationships among tourist arrivals, national environmental performance, human development performance, and national effective governance (voice and accountability, political stability and absence of violence, government effectiveness, regulatory quality, rule of law, and control of corruption). World Bank, World Economic Forum, and United Nations secondary data across 124 countries from 2016 were analyzed. Government effectiveness, political stability and absence of political stability and absence of violence, human development index and population were associated with the number of tourism arrivals. National environmental performance was not associated with tourism arrivals. Implications for future research and practice are offered.

Keywords

Tourist Governance Environmental performance 

References

  1. 1.
  2. 2.
  3. 3.
    Wilson J, Moore K (2018) Performance on the frontline of tourist decision making. J Trav Res 57:370–383.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287517696982 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kaufmann D, Kraay A (2002) Growth without governance. Discussion paper, World Bank Pol Res Working Paper No 2928Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sharpley R (2018) Tourism, tourists and society. Routledge, New York. ISBN: 9781138629394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Aziz N, Friedman BA, Ilhan H (2015) The impact of nonprofit organizations on the intent to visit Turkey: an empirical test using the theory of planned behavior. Place Brand Public Dipl:1–15Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lee TH, Fen-Hauh J (2018) Ecotourism behavior of nature-based tourists: an integrative framework. J Trav Res 57:792–810.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287517717350 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Camilleri MA (2016) Responsible tourism that creates shared value among stakeholders. Tour Plan Dev 13:219.  https://doi.org/10.1080/21568316.2015.1074100 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fennell DA (1999) Ecotourism: an introduction. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    George R (2017) Responsible tourism as a strategic marketing tool for improving the negative image of South Africa. Worldwide Hosp Tour Theme 9:543–554.  https://doi.org/10.1108/WHATT-07-2017-0031 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Holt D (1995) How consumers consume: a typology of consumption practices. J Consum Res 22:1–16.  https://doi.org/10.1086/209431 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lóránt D (2011) Tourism ecology: towards the responsible, sustainable tourism future. Worldwide Hosp Tour Theme 3:210–216.  https://doi.org/10.1108/17554211111142176 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Banerjee T, Bobroski P, Friedman BA (2017) Effective governance, female educational attainment, leadership and healthcare outcomes. Theor Econ Lett 7:1223–1232.  https://doi.org/10.4236/tel.2017.75082 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Amin MR (2017) Domestic tourists’ mind-set towards responsible tourism management: a case study on cox’s bazar, Bangladesh. Int J Tour Cit 3:121–142.  https://doi.org/10.1108/IJTC-09-2016-0028 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
  16. 16.
    Kaufmann D, Kraay A, Mastruzzi M (2011) The worldwide governance indicators: methodology and analytical issues. J Rule Law 3:220–246.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S1876404511200046 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    World Governance Indicators. http://info.worldbank. Retrieved from org/governance/wgi/index.aspx#home
  18. 18.
    Environmental Performance Index (2018). https://epi.envirocenter.yale.edu/
  19. 19.
    Wendling Z, Esty D, Emerson J, Levy M, de Sherbinin A et al. (2018) The 2018 environmental performance Index report. Yale Center for Environmental law and Policy, New Haven, CT. https://epi.envirocenter.yale.edu/node/36476 and https://epi.envirocenter.yale.edu/2018-epi-report/introduction
  20. 20.
    Human Development Index (2018) Human Development Indices and Indicators 2018 Statistical Update (2018) United Nation Development Program 11. http://hdr.undp.org/en/content/human-development-index-hdi
  21. 21.
    Belk R, Wallendorf M, Sherry J (1989) The sacred and profane in consumer behavior: theodicy on the odyssey. J Consum Res 16:1–38.  https://doi.org/10.1086/209191 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.State University of New YorkOswegoUSA

Personalised recommendations