Advertisement

Renewable Energy Matters for Tourism Industry in BRICS Plus Turkey Countries

  • Elma Satrovic
  • Adnan Muslija
  • Eda Yasa OzelturkayEmail author
Conference paper
  • 37 Downloads
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics book series (SPBE)

Abstract

The scope of this paper is to investigate whether or not the renewable energy influences the tourism industry in the case of BRICS plus Turkey countries. Due to the fact that the primary energy source in these countries is fossil fuels, this has risen up a serious concern on environmental issues. The motivation to select these countries lies in the fact that all of these six have recorded an exponential economic growth in the last few decades. As a consequence, the standard of living has been increased as well as the energy consumption. Thus, the annual panel data are collected in the period between 1995 and 2015 in the case of BRICS countries plus Turkey to explore the link of interest. We have employed the panel VAR methodology. The most important findings suggest a response of tourism industry to renewable energy to be significant and negative. However, this negative relationship holds true in the short-run while the long-run impact tends to be positive. These results can be of great importance for policy makers, thus this paper summarizes in detail the policy implications.

Keywords

BRICS countries Turkey Renewable energy Tourism 

References

  1. 1.
    Zhang S, Liu X (2019) The roles of international tourism and renewable energy in environment: new evidence from Asian countries. Renew Energy 139:385–394.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.02.046 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
  3. 3.
    Gössling S (2013) National emissions from tourism: an overlooked policy challenge? Energy Policy 59:433–442.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.03.058. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Nepal R, al Irsyad MI, Nepal SK (2019) Tourist arrivals, energy consumption and pollutant emissions in a developing economy–implications for sustainable tourism. Tourism Manag 72:145–154.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2018.08.025 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Katircioglu ST (2014) International tourism, energy consumption, and environmental pollution: the case of Turkey. Renew Sust Energ Rev 36:180–118.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.04.058 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Katircioglu ST, Feridun M, Kilinc C (2014) Estimating tourism-induced energy consumption and CO2 emissions: the case of Cyprus. Renew Sust Energ Rev 29:634–640.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.09.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Blanke J, Chiesa T (2011) The travel and tourism competitiveness index 2011: assessing industry drivers in the wake of the crisis. In: Blanke J, Chiesa T (eds) The travel and tourism competitiveness report 2011: beyond the downturn. World Economic Forum, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Day J, Cai L (2012) Environmental and energy-related challenges to sustainable tourism in the United States and China. Int J Sust Dev World 19:379–388.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2012.675600 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pereira MG, Camacho CF, Freitas MA, Silva NF (2012) The renewable energy market in Brazil: current status and potential. Renew Sust Energ Rev 16:3786–3802.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2012.03.024 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Overland I, Kjernet H (2009) Russian renewable energy the potential for international cooperation. Ashgate, FarnhamGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pillai IR, Banerjee R (2009) Renewable energy in India: status and potential. Energy 34:970–980.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2008.10.016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Liu W, Lund H, Mathiesen BV, Zhang X (2011) Potential of renewable energy systems in China. Appl Energy 88:518–525.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2010.07.014. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pegels A (2010) Renewable energy in South Africa: potentials, barriers and options for support. Energy Policy 38:4945–4954.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.03.077. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Vardar A, Taskin O (2014) Renewable energy sources and Turkey. Int J Energy Power Eng 3:245–249.  https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijepe.20140305.14 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Satrovic E (2018) The human development relies on renewable energy: evidence from Turkey. In: 3rd International Energy & Engineering, Book of Proceedings, Gaziantep, Turkey, pp 19–27. https://docs.wixstatic.com/ugd/315b3d_a4d7493ae65e4815be5ae3ab05f83d3f.pdf. Accessed 21 Nov 2018
  16. 16.
    Abrigo M, Love I (2016) Estimation of panel vector auto regression in Stata: a package of programs. Working Paper No. 16-2.University of HawaiGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Canova F, Pappa P (2007) Price differentials in monetary unions: the role of fiscal shocks. Econ J 117:713–737.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0297.2007.02047.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Canova F, Perez Forero F (2012) Estimating over identified, non-recursive, time varying coefficients, structural VARs. UPF working paperGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Satrovic E, Muslija A (2018) Causality relationship between foreign direct ınvestment and tourism. Int J Econ Adm Stud 22:65–76.  https://doi.org/10.18092/ulikidince.418132. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Satrovic E (2018) Merits of life insurance. GRIN Verlag, MunichGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Andrews DWK, Lu B (2001) Consistent model and moment selection procedures for GMM estimation with application to dynamic panel data models. J Econ 101:123–164.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(00)00077-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Elma Satrovic
    • 1
  • Adnan Muslija
    • 2
  • Eda Yasa Ozelturkay
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Cag UniversityYenice/MersinTurkey
  2. 2.University of SarajevoSarajevoBosnia and Herzegovina

Personalised recommendations