Advertisement

A Comparative Analysis of Open Government Data in Several Countries: The Practices and Problems

  • Amirudin SyarifEmail author
  • Mohamad Aizi bin Salamat
  • Rusmin Syafari
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 978)

Abstract

Open Government Data (OGD) practice for researchers are intriguing to analyze as a decade has passed and showed many differences in application from each country. This difference may occur due to diversity in culture of openness, level of openness, and the level of trust or confidence of the country in opening data. Researchers presume that there is linearity in both, in meaning if the practice of government in the real world goes well then so is in cyberspace. Researchers also assume that OGD practices in developing countries in terms of success and failure are not equal to developed countries. It is interesting for researches to study the practice of OGD member of Association of Southeast Asian Nations that is developing countries with culture of openness, level of openness, and the level of trust or confidence of the country that is similar due to its homogeneity to ASEAN nations. This paper gives out description and study of the reality of OGD practices from ASEAN countries. Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) through literature review is done to see the ratio of OGD practices among developing countries especially ASEAN countries.

Keywords

Open government data ASEAN Openness Qualitative comparative analysis 

References

  1. 1.
    Cartofeanu C, Macrinici D (2017) Evaluating the success of eGovernment OpenData platform at increasing transparency in Moldova: from the perspectives of journalists and developersGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Araújo NM, Filho FMF, Melo LA (2018) Open data from the Brazilian government : understanding the perspectives of data suppliers and developers of applications to the citizensGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hiramoto K (2012) e-Government and open government data in Japan, JapanGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Geiger CP, Von Lucke J (2018) Open government and (Linked) (Open) (Government) (Data). JeDEM eJournal eDemocracy Open Gov 4(2):265–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    van Schalkwyk F, Willmers M, McNaughton M (2016) Viscous open data: the roles of intermediaries in an open data ecosystem. Inf Technol DevGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Vracic T, Varga M, Curko K (2016) Effects and evaluation of open government data initiative in Croatia. In: 2016 39th International convention on information and communication technology, electronics and microelectronics, MIPRO 2016, pp 1521–1526Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Srimuang C, Cooharojananone N, Tanlamai U, Chandrachai A (2017) Open government data assessment model: an indicator development in ThailandGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Roa HN, Loza-Aguirre E, Flores P (2019) A survey on the problems affecting the development of open government data initiatives. In: 2019 Sixth international conference eDemocracy eGovernment, pp 157–163Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Aarshi S, Malik BH, Habib F (2018) Dimensions of open government data web portals : a case of Asian countries. Int J Adv Comput Sci Appl 9(6):459–469Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nugroho RP (2014) Comparing open data policies and their implementation in developed and developing countries. J Penelit dan Pengemb Komun dan Inform 4(3):159–172MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gonzalez-Zapata F, Heeks R (2015) The multiple meanings of open government data: understanding different stakeholders and their perspectives. Gov Inf Q 32(4):441–452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    De Oliveira EF, Silveira MS (2018) Open government data in Brazil a systematic review of its uses and issues. In: Proceedings of the 19th annual international conference on digital government research, p 9Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chen YN, Chen HM, Huang W, Ching RKH (2006) E-government strategies in developed and developing countries: an implementation framework and case study. Glob Inf Manag 14(1):23–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zhu X (2017) The failure of an early episode in the open government data movement : a historical case study. Gov Inf QGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Vetrò A et al (2016) Open data quality measurement framework: definition and application to open government data. Gov Inf Q 33(2):325–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kassen M (2017) Open data in Kazakhstan: incentives, implementation and challenges. Inf Technol People 30(2):301–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Charalabidis Y, Alexopoulos C, Loukis E (2015) A taxonomy of open government data research areas and topics. J Organ Comput Electron Commer 26(1–2):41–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Veljković N, Bogdanović-Dinić S, Stoimenov L (2014) Benchmarking open government: An open data perspective. Gov Inf Q 31(2):278–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Neuroni AC, Riedl R, Brugger J (2013) Swiss executive authorities on open government data—policy making beyond transparency and participation. In: Proceedings of the annual Hawaii international conference on system sciences, pp 1911–1920Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wirtz BW, Birkmeyer S (2015) Open government: origin, development, and conceptual perspectives. Int J Public Adm 1–16(January):37–41Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Huang R, Lai T, Zhou L (2017) Proposing a framework of barriers to opening government data in China. Libr Hi Tech 35(3):421–438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Saxena S (2017) Significance of open government data in the GCC countries. Digit Policy Regul Gov 19(3):251–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wirtz BW et al (2016) Resistance of public personnel to open government : a cognitive theory view of implementation barriers towards open government data. Public personnel to open, vol 9037, February 2016Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Huber, S (2012) Indicators for the fitness of municipal open government data (ogd) to be processed into e-participation innovations with intended societal impacts. In: Electronic government and electronic participation, vol 39, pp 249–258Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Parycek P, Hochtl J, Ginner M (2014) Open government data implementation evaluation. J Theor Appl Electron Commer Res 9(2):80–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Molina-Azorin JF (2012) Mixed methods research in strategic management: impact and applications. Organ Res Methods 15(1):33–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Gunarto M, Syarif MA (2014) Penggunaan Analisis Biplot pada Pemetaan Perguruan Tinggi Swasta di Kota Palembang. In: Forum Manajemen Indonesia 6, pp 1–13Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Global Open Data Index (2019) OGD Ranking. https://index.okfn.org/place/. Accessed 25 Sept 2019
  29. 29.
    Pasaribu NMA (2017) A comparative study of open data policies: lessons learned from Indonesia’ s and The Philippines’ participation in open government partnership Asia-Europe Institute. Kuala Lumpur, MalaysiaGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Srimuang C (2018) Development of an open government data assessment model: user-centric approach to identify the weighted components in Thailand. Int J Electron Gov 10(3):1Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ahmed MS, Bin Mahmuddin M, Mahat NIB (2017) The factor affecting Malaysian citizens satisfaction with open government data. J Eng Appl Sci 12(15):3843–3846Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    World Bank Group (2017) The Malaysia development experience series—open data readiness assessment (ODRA) report. Kuala Lumpur, MalaysiaCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Kaur R (2006) Malaysian e-government implementation framework, University of MalayaGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Saxena S (2018) Drivers and barriers to re-use Open Government Data (OGD): a case study of open data initiative in Philippines. Digit Policy Regul Gov 20(4)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    World Bank Group (2019) Digital government and open data readiness assessment, February 2019Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Stagars M (2016) Open data in southeast Asia. Palgrave Pivot, SingaporeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Saphangthong T, Phissamay P, Inthavong C (2017) Knowledge information and data in the Mekong Lao open data experiences, Yangon, p 25Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Amirudin Syarif
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Mohamad Aizi bin Salamat
    • 2
  • Rusmin Syafari
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Management and Information SystemUniversitas Bina DarmaPalembangIndonesia
  2. 2.Faculty of Computer Science and Information TechnologyUniversiti Tun Hussein Onn MalaysiaParit Raja, Batu PahatMalaysia

Personalised recommendations