Advertisement

Abrasive Water Jet Machining of Ceramic Composites

  • JagadishEmail author
  • Kapil Gupta
Chapter
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Applied Sciences and Technology book series (BRIEFSAPPLSCIENCES)

Abstract

This chapter is focused on machining performance of AWJM process during the machining of zirconia (ZrO2) ceramic composites. Experiments are conducted using the Taguchi (L27) method to analyze the influence of AWJM parameters [standoff distance (A), the working pressure (B), and nozzle speed (C)] on the response parameters such as MRR and surface roughness (SR). In addition, regression and ANOVA analysis are performed to show the statistical significance of the AWJM (green machining) process. Moreover, empirical equations are derived which define the responses as a mathematical function of input variables for optimum prediction response parameters for the green machining (AWJM) process. In addition, multiple objective particle swarm optimization based on crowding distance (MOPSO-COD) method is employed to solve the optimization problem that simultaneously minimizes SR by maximizing MRR. The overall optimal setting obtained is A (1.5 mm, level 1), B (150 MPa, level 1), and C (225 mm/min, level 1). The corresponding green attributes obtained are MRR as 345.72 mm3/min and SR as 0.194 µm. Confirmatory results for MRR and SR are found closer to the experimental results and well within the considerable ranges and satisfactory.

Keywords

Abrasive Ceramics Machining ANOVA MRR Roughness Water jet 

References

  1. 1.
    T.B. Thoe, D.K. Aspinwall, M.L.H. Wise, Review on ultrasonic machining. Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 38(4), 239–255 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    I. Denry, J.R. Kelly, State of the art of zirconia for dental applications. Dent. Mater. 24(3), 299–307 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    G.S. Choi, G.H. Choi, Process analysis and monitoring in abrasive water jet machining of alumina ceramics. Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 37(3), 295–307 (1997)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    E. Siores, W.C.K. Wong, L. Chen, J.G. Wager, Enhancing abrasive waterjet cutting of ceramics by head oscillation techniques. Ann. CIRP 45(1), 327–330 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    J. Holmberg, J. Berglund, A. Wretland, T. Beno, Evaluation of surface integrity after high energy machining with EDM, laser beam machining and abrasive water jet machining of alloy 718. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 100(5–8), 1575–1591 (2018)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    E.O. Ezugwu, Z.M. Wang, A.R. Machado, The machinability of nickel-based alloys: a review. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 86(1–3), 1–16 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    D.K.M. Tan, A model for the surface finish in abrasive-waterjet cutting, in 8th International Symposium on Jet Cutting Technology (1986), pp. 309–313Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    R.M. Samson, T. Geethapriyan, A.A. Raj, A. Ashok, A. Rajesh, Parametric optimization of abrasive water jet machining of beryllium copper using Taguchi grey relational analysis, in Advances in Manufacturing Processes (Springer, Singapore, 2019), pp. 501–520Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jagadish, S. Bhowmik, A. Ray, Prediction and optimization of process parameters of green composites in AWJM process using response surface methodology. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 87(5–8), 1359–1370 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    M.M. Korat, G.D. Acharya, A review on current research and development in abrasive waterjet machining. J. Eng. Res. 4, 423–432 (2014)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    J. Wang, Machinability study of polymer matrix composites using abrasive waterjet cutting technology. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 94, 30–35 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    W. Konig, S. Rummenholler, Technological and industrial safety aspects in milling FRP. ASME Mach. Adv. Comp. 45(66), 1–14 (1993)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    S. Kalirasu, N. Rajini, J.T.W. Jappes, Mechanical and machining performance of glass and coconut sheath fibre polyester composites using AWJM. J. Reinf. Plast. Compos. 34(7), 564–580 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    J. Kechagias, G. Petropoulos, N. Vaxevanidis, Application of Taguchi design for quality characterization of abrasive water jet machining of TRIP sheet steels. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 62(5–8), 635–643 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    P.J. Ross, Taguchi Techniques for Quality Engineering: Loss Function, Orthogonal Experiments, Parameter and Tolerance Design. No. TS156 R12 (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1988)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    G.C.M. Patel, P. Krishna, M.B. Parappagoudar, Squeeze casting process modeling by a conventional statistical regression analysis approach. Appl. Math. Model. 40(15–16), 6869–6888 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    R. Eberhart, J. Kennedy, A new optimizer using particle swarm theory, in MHS’95, Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium on Micro Machine and Human Science, 1995 (IEEE, 1995)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    F. Van den Bergh, A.P. Engelbrecht, A study of particle swarm optimization particle trajectories. Inf. Sci. 176(8), 937–971 (2006)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    R.C. Eberhart, Y. Shi, Comparison between genetic algorithms and particle swarm optimization, in International Conference on Evolutionary Programming (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1998)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    G. Zhang, Y. Li, Y. Shi, Distributed learning particle swarm optimizer for global optimization of multimodal problems. Front. Comput. Sci. 12(1), 122–134 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    G.C.M. Patel, P. Krishna, M.B. Parappagoudar, P.R. Vundavilli, Multi-objective optimization of squeeze casting process using evolutionary algorithms. Int. J. Swarm Intell. Res. (IJSIR) 7(1), 55–74 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    G.R. Chate, G.C.M. Patel, A.S. Deshpande, M.B. Parappagoudar, Modeling and optimization of furan molding sand system using design of experiments and particle swarm optimization. Proc. IMechE Part E J. Process Mech. Eng. 232(5), 579–598 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    G.C.M. Patel, P. Krishna, M.B. Parappagoudar, P.R. Vundavilli, S.B. Bhushan, Squeeze casting parameter optimization using swarm intelligence and evolutionary algorithms, in Critical Developments and Applications of Swarm Intelligence (IGI Global, 2018), pp. 245–270Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringNational Institute of TechnologyRaipurIndia
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering TechnologyUniversity of JohannesburgJohannesburgSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations