Advertisement

Improving Localization by Learning Pole-Like Landmarks Using a Semi-supervised Approach

  • Tiago BarrosEmail author
  • Luís Garrote
  • Ricardo Pereira
  • Cristiano Premebida
  • Urbano J. Nunes
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 1092)

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to contribute with an object-based learning and selection methods to improve localization and mapping techniques. The methods use 3D-LiDAR data which is suitable for autonomous driving systems operating in urban environments. The objects of interest to be served as landmarks are pole-like objects which are naturally present in the environment. To detect and recognize pole-like objects in 3D-LiDAR data, a semi-supervised iterative label propagation method has been developed. Additionally, a selection method is proposed for selection the best poles to be used in the localization loop. The LiDAR localization and mapping system is validated using data from the KITTI database. Reported results show that by considering the occurrence of pole-like objects over time leads to an improvement on both the learning model and the localization.

Keywords

LiDAR odometry Semi-supervised learning Incremental label propagation SLAM Pole-based localization 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported partially by the project MATIS (CENTRO-01-0145-FEDER-000014) co-financed by the European Regional Development Fund (FEDER) through of the Centro Regional Operacional Program (CENTRO2020), Portugal. It was also partially supported by the University of Coimbra, Institute of Systems and Robotics (ISR-UC) and FCT (Portuguese Science Foundation) through grant UID/EEA/00048/2019.

References

  1. 1.
    Bergström, P., Edlund, O.: Robust registration of point sets using iteratively reweighted least squares. Comput. Optim. Appl. 58(3), 543–561 (2014)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bresson, G., Alsayed, Z., Yu, L., Glaser, S.: Simultaneous localization and mapping: a survey of current trends in autonomous driving. IEEE Trans. Intell. Veh. 2(3), 194–220 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chiotellis, I., Zimmermann, F., Cremers, D., Triebel, R.: Incremental semi-supervised learning from streams for object classification. In: 2018 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), pp. 5743–5749 (2018)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ester, M., Kriegel, H.P., Sander, J., Xu, X., et al.: A density-based algorithm for discovering clusters in large spatial databases with noise. In: KDD, pp. 226–231 (1996)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Garrote, L., Torres, M., Barros, T., Perdiz, J., Premebida, C., Nunes, U.J.: Mobile robot localization with reinforcement learning map update decision aided by an absolute indoor positioning system. In: 2019 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) (2019)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gaylor, D.E., Lightsey, E.G., Key, K.W.: Effects of multipath and signal blockage on GPS navigation in the vicinity of the international space station (ISS). Navigation 52(2), 61–70 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Geiger, A., Lenz, P., Stiller, C., Urtasun, R.: Vision meets robotics: the KITTI dataset. Int. J. Robot. Res. (IJRR) 14(3), 195–210 (2013)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jacobson, A., Zeng, F., Smith, D., Boswell, N., Peynot, T., Milford, M.: Semi-supervised SLAM: leveraging low-cost sensors on underground autonomous vehicles for position tracking. In: 2018 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), pp. 3970–3977 (2018)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kampker, A., Hatzenbuehler, J., Klein, L., Sefati, M., Kreiskoether, K.D., Gert, D.: Concept study for vehicle self-localization using neural networks for detection of pole-like landmarks. In: International Conference on Intelligent Autonomous Systems, pp. 689–705. Springer (2018)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lam, J., Kusevic, K., Mrstik, P., Harrap, R., Greenspan, M.: Urban scene extraction from mobile ground based LIDAR data. In: Proceedings of 3DPVT, pp. 1–8 (2010)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Li, Y., Wang, W., Tang, S., Li, D., Wang, Y., Yuan, Z., Guo, R., Li, X., Xiu, W.: Localization and extraction of road poles in urban areas from mobile laser scanning data. Remote Sens. 11(4), 401 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ordóñez, C., Cabo, C., Sanz-Ablanedo, E.: Automatic detection and classification of pole-like objects for urban cartography using mobile laser scanning data. Sensors 17(7), 1465 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Schaefer, A., Büscher, D., Vertens, J., Luft, L., Burgard, W.: Long-term urban vehicle localization using pole landmarks extracted from 3-D lidar scans (2019)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Schipperijn, J., Kerr, J., Duncan, S., Madsen, T., Klinker, C.D., Troelsen, J.: Dynamic accuracy of GPS receivers for use in health research: a novel method to assess GPS accuracy in real-world settings. Front. Public Health 2, 21 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sefati, M., Daum, M., Sondermann, B., Kreisköther, K.D., Kampker, A.: Improving vehicle localization using semantic and pole-like landmarks. In: 2017 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV), pp. 13–19 (2017)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Teichman, A., Thrun, S.: Group induction. In: 2013 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), pp. 2757–2763 (2013)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Weng, L., Yang, M., Guo, L., Wang, B., Wang, C.: Pole-based real-time localization for autonomous driving in congested urban scenarios. In: 2018 IEEE International Conference on Real-time Computing and Robotics (RCAR), pp. 96–101 (2018)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Williams, T., Alves, P., Lachapelle, G., Basnayake, C.: Evaluation of GPS-based methods of relative positioning for automotive safety applications. Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol. 23, 98–108 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zhu, X., Ghahramani, Z.: Learning from labeled and unlabeled data with label propagation. Tech. rep. CMU-CALD-02-107, Carnegie Mellon University (2002)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ziegler, J., Bender, P., Schreiber, M., Lategahn, H., Strauss, T., Stiller, C., Dang, T., Franke, U., Appenrodt, N., Keller, C.G., et al.: Making bertha drive–an autonomous journey on a historic route. IEEE Intell. Transp. Syst. Mag. 6(2), 8–20 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tiago Barros
    • 1
    Email author
  • Luís Garrote
    • 1
  • Ricardo Pereira
    • 1
  • Cristiano Premebida
    • 1
    • 2
  • Urbano J. Nunes
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Systems and Robotics, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Polo IIUniversity of CoimbraCoimbraPortugal
  2. 2.Department of Aeronautical and Automotive EngineeringLoughborough UniversityLoughboroughUK

Personalised recommendations