Advertisement

Fostering Open Innovation in Coworking Spaces: A Study of Norwegian Startups

  • Simone Sperindé
  • Anh Nguyen-Duc
Chapter
  • 103 Downloads

Abstract

Coworking spaces and open innovation are two trends that emerged in the early 2000s and have gained considerable attention. Although there exists a vast amount of research on either of these topics, the connection between them has not been much explored. The aim of this research study was to assess the state of practice of open innovation in coworking spaces and to propose a model that captures this phenomenon. Empirical data were collected by surveys and interviews with seven entrepreneurs operating Norwegian coworking spaces and two managers of coworking spaces. We found that coworking spaces express a large potential to foster open innovation among early-stage startups. Also, open innovation was found to already occur in coworking spaces: Among the four coworking space dimensions analyzed—places, spaces, events, and projects—events were regarded as the most important ones, since they act as enablers for cooperation dynamics.

Keywords

Open innovation Coworking space Early-stage startup 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Cabral, V., Winden, W.V.: Coworking: an analysis of coworking strategies for interaction and innovation. In: Regional Studies Association Annual Conference, Graz (2016).  https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.4404.5208
  2. 2.
    Spinuzzi, C.: Working alone together: coworking as emergent collaborative activity. J. Bus. Tech. Commun. 26, 399–441 (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651912444070 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Capdevila, I.: Different inter-organizational collaboration approaches in coworking spaces in Barcelona. SSRN Electron. J. 1–30 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2502816
  4. 4.
    Waters-Lynch, J., Potts, J., Butcher, T., Dodson, J., Hurley, J.: Coworking: A Transdisciplinary Overview (SSRN Scholarly Paper No. ID 2712217). Social Science Research Network, Rochester, NY (2016)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
  6. 6.
    Parrino, L.: Coworking: assessing the role of proximity in knowledge exchange. Knowl. Manage. Res. Pract. 13, 261–271 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1057/kmrp.2013.47 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chesbrough, H.W.: The era of open innovation. MIT Sloan Manage. Rev. 44, 35–41 (2003)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    West, J., Bogers, M.: Leveraging External Sources of Innovation: A Review of Research on Open Innovation (SSRN Scholarly Paper No. ID 2195675). Social Science Research Network, Rochester, NY (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lee, S., Park, G., Yoon, B., Park, J.: Open innovation in SMEs—an intermediated network model. Res. Policy. 39, 290–300 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Capdevila, I.: Co-working spaces and the localised dynamics of innovation in Barcelona. Int. J. Innov. Manage. 19, 1540004 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919615400046 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bathelt, H., Malmberg, A., Maskell, P.: Clusters and knowledge: local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation. Prog. Hum. Geogr. 28, 31–56 (2004).  https://doi.org/10.1191/0309132504ph469oa CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rantisi, N.M., Leslie, D.: Materiality and creative production: the case of the mile end neighborhood in Montréal. Environ. Plan. A. 42, 2824–2841 (2010).  https://doi.org/10.1068/a4310 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jones-Evans, D., Gkikas, A., Rhisiart, M., MacKenzie, N.G.: Measuring open innovation in SMEs. In: Vanhaverbeke, W., Frattini, F., Roijakkers, N., Usman, M. (eds.) Researching Open Innovation in SMEs. World Scientific, London (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1142/9789813230972_0013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Doloreux, D.: Use of internal and external sources of knowledge and innovation in the Canadian wine industry. Rev. Can. Sci. Adm. [Can. J. Adm. Sci.]. 32, 102–112 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1002/cjas.1312 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mariz-Pérez, R.M., Teijeiro-Alvarez, M.M., García-Alvarez, M.T.: The relevance of human capital as a driver for innovation. Cuad. Econ. 68–76 (n.d.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cohen, W.M., Levinthal, D.A.: Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Adm. Sci. Q. 35, 128–152 (1990).  https://doi.org/10.2307/2393553 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Braun, V., Clarke, V.: Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual. Res. Psychol. 3, 77–101 (2006).  https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Yin, R.K.: Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA (2003)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Capdevila, I.: Knowledge Dynamics in Localized Communities: Coworking Spaces as Microclusters (SSRN scholarly paper no. ID 2414121). Social Science Research Network, Rochester, NY (2013)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Johns, T., Gratton, L.: The third wave of virtual work [WWW Document]. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2013/01/the-third-wave-of-virtual-work (2013). Accessed 6 Nov 2018

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of TrentoTrentoItaly
  2. 2.Department of Business and ITUniversity of Southeast NorwayBø i TelemarkNorway

Personalised recommendations