Optimization of the Emissions Profile of a Marine Propulsion System Using a Shaft Generator with a MMPT Based Control System and the Use of EEDI and EEOI

  • Joel R. Pérez OssesEmail author
  • Carlos A. Reusser FranckEmail author
Conference paper


Nowadays marine propulsion systems based on thermal machines that operate under the diesel cycle have positioned themselves as one of the main options for this type of applications. The main comparative advantages of diesel engines, compared to other propulsion systems based on thermal machines, are the low specific fuel consumption, residuals and their higher thermal efficiency. However, its main disadvantage lies in the emissions produced by combustion, such as carbon dioxide (CO2), oxide sulphur (SOx) and oxide nitrogen (NOx). These emissions are directly related to the operating conditions of the propulsion system [1].

Over the last decade, the International Maritime Organization (IMO), has adopted a series of regulations to reduce these emissions [2, 3], based on the introduction of an energy efficiency design index (EEDI) and an energy efficiency operational indicator (EEOI). EEDI is mandatory for any new ship and the EEOI is optional to be applied. In this context, adding a shaft generator [4] allows to reduce the nominal design power of the auxiliary generation system and, under nominal operating conditions, the propulsion plant, favouring lower EEDI and EEOI values, which means lower CO2, SOx and NOx emissions [5, 6].

However, the use of shaft generators can only be justified if the propulsion system operates, most of the time, under 75%–80% of the maximum continuous rating (MCR) design. In addition, the incorrect operation of the shaft generator can result in overloading the main engine, which means an increase of CO2, NOx and SOx emissions.

The present work proposes a selective control system with a Maximum Power Point Tracking (MPPT) that allows operating the shaft generator in Power Take Off (PTO) or Power Take In (PTI) mode ensuring that the main engine operates, always, at the optimum point to generate minimum CO2, SOx and NOx emissions.


Marine propulsion system Shaft generator EEDI EEOI Emissions and control system 


  1. 1.
    Bilgin, B., Magne, P., Malysz, P., Yang, Y., Pantelic, V., Preindl, M., et al.: Making the case for electrified transportation. IEEE Trans. Transp. Electrif. 1(1), 4–17 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    MEPC.212(63) Annex 8 - 2012 Guidelines on the Method of Calculation of the Attained EEDI for New Ships (2012)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Circ.681 - Interim Guidelines on the Method of Calculation of the Energy Efficiency Design Index for New Ships (2009)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Prousalidis, J., Patsios, C., Kanellos, F., Sarigiannidis, A., Tsekouras, N., Antonopoulos, G. (eds.): Exploiting shaft generators to improve ship efficiency. In: 2012 Electrical Systems for Aircraft, Railway and Ship Propulsion, 16–18 October 2012 (2012)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sarigiannidis, A.G., Chatzinikolaou, E., Patsios, C., Kladas, A.G.: Shaft generator system design and ship operation improvement involving SFOC minimization, electric grid conditioning, and auxiliary propulsion. IEEE Trans. Transp. Electrif. 2(4), 558–569 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sarigiannidis, A., Kladas, A., Chatzinikolaou, E., Patsios, C. (eds.): High efficiency shaft generator drive system design for Ro-Ro trailer-passenger ship application. In: 2015 International Conference on Electrical Systems for Aircraft, Railway, Ship Propulsion and Road Vehicles (ESARS), 3–5 March 2015 (2015)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Molland, A.F., Turnock, S.R., Hudson, D.A. (eds.): Ship Resistance and Propulsion: Practical Estimation of Ship Propulsive Power. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2011)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Shi, W., Grimmelius, H.T., Stapersma, D.: Analysis of ship propulsion system behaviour and the impact on fuel consumption. Int. Shipbuild. Prog. 57, 30 (2010)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Woud, H.K., Stapersma, D. (eds.): Design of Propulsion and Electric Power Generation Systems. IMarEST, Institute of Marine Engineering, Science and Technology, London (2002)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Circ.684 - Guidelines for Voluntary Use of the Ship Energy Efficiency Operational Indicator (EEOI) (2009)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Griffiths, D.: Marine Low Speed Diesel Engines. Institute of Marine Engineers (2006)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    MEPC.215(63) Annex 11 - Guidelines for Calculation of Reference Lines for Use With the EEDI (2012)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wu, B., Narimani, M.: High-Power Converters and AC Drives. Wiley, Hoboken (2016)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Holtz, J.: The representation of AC machine dynamics by complex signal flow graphs. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 42(3), 263–271 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Novotny, D.W., Lipo, T.A.: Vector Control and Dynamics of AC Drives. Clarendon Press, Oxford (1996)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Clarksons. Clarksons World Fleet Register (2019).
  17. 17.
    MAN Diesel & Turbo. MAN Diesel & Turbo Engine Builder (2019).

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Universidad Austral de ChileValdiviaChile
  2. 2.Universidad Técnica Federico Santa MaríaValparaísoChile

Personalised recommendations