Advertisement

Awareness and Acceptance of the Public Regarding Alternative Water Sources

  • Agnieszka StecEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Water Science and Technology Library book series (WSTL, volume 90)

Abstract

In recent years, there have been publications presenting the opinions of various communities regarding their adoption and implementation of centralized and decentralized rainwater harvesting and graywater recycling systems, but this was mainly for countries outside Europe. Considering the above, the research was carried out in selected European countries whose aim was to determine the factors influencing society’s reluctance to use gray water and rainwater. The analysis of the results allowed determining the level of awareness about water shortages, water-saving behavior, and the attitude of respondents to alternative water sources. The analysis also took into account demographic and external factors such as geographical location and climate, which may affect the results.

References

  1. Arrkelin D (2014) Using SPSS to understand research and data analysis. Psychology curricular materials. Book 1. Valparaiso UniversityGoogle Scholar
  2. Dolnicar S, Schäfer A (2009) Desalinated versus recycled water: public perceptions and profiles of the accepters. J Environ Manag 90(2):888–900CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Dolnicar S, Hurlimann A, Nghiem L (2010) The effect of information on public acceptance—the case of water from alternative sources. J Environ Manag 91(6):1288–1293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Domènech L, Saurí D (2010) Socio-technical transitions in water scarcity contexts: public acceptance of greywater reuse technologies in the Metropolitan Area of Barcelona. Resour Conserv Recycl 55:53–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Fielding KS, Dolnicar S, Schultz T (2018) Public acceptance of recycled water. Int J Water Resour Dev 1:1–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Garcia-Cuerva L, Berglund E, Binder A (2016) Public perceptions of water shortages, conservation behaviors, and support for water reuse in the U.S. Resour Conserv Recycl 113:106–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gu Q, Chen Y, Pody R, Cheng R, Zheng X, Zhang Z (2015) Public perception and acceptability toward reclaimed water in Tianjin. Resour Conserv Recycl 104:291–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hurlimann A, Dolnicar S (2010) When public opposition defeats alternative water projects—the Case of Toowoomba Australia. Water Res 44(1):287–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ong M, Puteh F (2017) Quantitative data analysis: choosing between SPSS, PLS and AMOS in social science research. Int Interdiscip J Sci Res 3:14–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Skoien G, Gardner T (2008) Decentralised water supplies. South East Queensland householders’ experience and attitudes. Water 35:17–22Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering and Architecture, Department of Infrastructure and Water ManagementRzeszow University of TechnologyRzeszówPoland

Personalised recommendations