Exploring the Causal Modeling of Human-Robot Touch Interaction

  • Soheil KeshmiriEmail author
  • Hidenobu Sumioka
  • Takashi Minato
  • Masahiro Shiomi
  • Hiroshi Ishiguro
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11876)


The growing emergence of socially assistive robots in our daily lives inevitably entails such interactions as touch and hug between robots and humans. Therefore, derivation of robust models for such physical interactions to enable robots to perform them in naturalistic fashion is highly desirable. In this study, we investigated whether it was possible to realize distinct patterns of different touch interactions that were general representations of their respective types. For this purpose, we adapted three touch interaction paradigms and asked human subjects to perform them on a mannequin that was equipped with a touch sensor on its torso. We then applied Wiener-Granger causality on the time series of activated channels of this touch sensor that were common (per touch paradigm) among all participants. The analyses of these touch time series suggested that different types of touch can be quantified in terms of causal association between sequential steps that form the variation information among their patterns. These results hinted at the potential utility of such generalized touch patterns for devising social robots with robust causal models of naturalistic touch behaviour for their human-robot touch interactions.


  1. 1.
    Gallace, A., Spence, C.: The science of interpersonal touch: an overview. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 34, 246–259 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Field, T.: Touch for socioemotional and physical well-being: a review. Dev. Rev. 30, 367–383 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Matarić, M.J.: Socially assistive robotics: Human augmentation versus automation. Sci. Robot. 2, eaam5410 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mann, J.A., MacDonald, B.A., Kuo, I., Li, X., Broadbent, E.: People respond better to robots than computer tablets delivering healthcare instructions. Comput. Hum. Behav. 43, 112–117 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Broadbent, E.: Interactions with robots: the truths we reveal about ourselves. Ann. Rev. Psychol. 68, 627–652 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Nakagawa, K., Shiomi, M., Shinozawa, K., Matsumura, R., Ishiguro, H., Hagita, N.: Does a robot’s touch encourage human effort? Int. J. Soc. Robot. 9, 5–15 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Schaal, S.: Is imitation learning the route to humanoid robots? Trends Cogn. Sci. 3, 233–242 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Granger, C.W.J.: Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica 37, 424–438 (1969)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Geweke, J.: Measures of conditional linear dependence and feedback between time series. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 79, 907–915 (1984)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pereda, E., Quiroga, R.W., Bhattacharya, J.: Nonlinear multivariate analysis of neurophysiological signals. Prog. Neurobiol. 77, 1–37 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hamilton, J.D.: Time Series Analysis. Princeton University Press, Printceton (1994)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kwiatkowski, D., Phillips, P.C., Schmidt, P., Shin, Y.: Testing the null hypothesis of stationarity against the alternative of a unit root. J. Econ. 54, 159–178 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Barnett, L., Seth, A.K.: The MVGC multivariate Granger causality toolbox: a new approach to Granger-causal inference. J. Neurosci. Methods 223, 50–68 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pearl, J.: Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems: Networks of Plausible Inference. Elsevier, San Fransisco (1988)zbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Soheil Keshmiri
    • 1
    Email author
  • Hidenobu Sumioka
    • 1
  • Takashi Minato
    • 1
  • Masahiro Shiomi
    • 1
  • Hiroshi Ishiguro
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Advanced Telecommunications Research Institute International (ATR)KyotoJapan
  2. 2.Osaka UniversityOsakaJapan

Personalised recommendations