Advertisement

Detecting and Monitoring Informal Trails in an Urban Mountain Preserve Using Small Unmanned Aerial Systems

  • Tony H. Grubesic
  • Jake R. Nelson
Chapter

Abstract

Informal trails represent a serious threat to open spaces, parks, wilderness areas, and protected natural areas in many different locations and contexts. From vegetation loss, the displacement of wildlife, and alteration of habitats to soil degradation and erosion, landscape fragmentation, and the spread of invasive species, significant and continual effort to detect, monitor, and interdict informal trails is required. The purpose of this chapter is to detail the ways in which small unmanned aerial systems can contribute to efforts for detecting the presence of informal trails. A case study of the Phoenix Mountains Preserves in Phoenix, Arizona helps to illustrate how basic spatial analytics combined with sUAS imagery can identify landscape fragmentation and potential interdiction points for minimizing the use of informal trails for enhancing landscape recovery.

Keywords

Informal trails Preserve Soil Wildland Piestewa ArcGIS FRAGSTATS Field inventory 

References

  1. Arizona Department of Transportation [AZDOT]. (2017). AADT reports: Traffic counts. Retrieved August 17, 2019, from https://tinyurl.com/yxby4p6m
  2. Barros, A., & Pickering, C. M. (2017). How networks of informal trails cause landscape level damage to vegetation. Environmental Management, 60(1), 57–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boorman, L. A., & Fuller, R. M. (1977). Studies on the impact of paths on the dune vegetation at Winterton, Norfolk, England. Biological Conservation, 12(3), 203–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cushman, S. A., McGarigal, K., & Neel, M. C. (2008). Parsimony in landscape metrics: Strength, universality, and consistency. Ecological Indicators, 8(5), 691–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cushman, S. A., Shirk, A., & Landguth, E. L. (2012). Separating the effects of habitat area, fragmentation and matrix resistance on genetic differentiation in complex landscapes. Landscape ecology, 27(3), 369–380.Google Scholar
  6. Dale, M. (2018). Is south mountain park the country’s largest? KJZZ. Retrieved August 12, 2019, from https://tinyurl.com/y55g7fsp
  7. ESRI. (2019). ArcGIS desktop: Release 10.7.1. Redlands, CA: Environmental Systems Research Institute.Google Scholar
  8. Forman, R. T. T. (1995). Land mosaics. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Forman, R. T., & Alexander, L. E. (1998). Roads and their major ecological effects. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 29(1), 207–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gallen, T. (2019). Phoenix leads US in population growth, new census data shows. Phoenix Business Journal. Retrieved August 19, 2019, from https://tinyurl.com/y5f3eb2j
  11. Hammitt, W. E., & Cole, D. H. (1998). Wildland Recreation: Ecology and Management, 2nd ed. John Wiley &Sons, New York.Google Scholar
  12. Hammitt, W. E., Cole, D. N., & Monz, C. A. (2015). Wildland recreation: Ecology and management. Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
  13. Hawes, A. (2005). Surviving the sonoran. Zoogoer. Retrieved August 25, 2019, from https://tinyurl.com/yxrnccmp
  14. Jägerbrand, A. K., & Alatalo, J. M. (2015). Effects of human trampling on abundance and diversity of vascular plants, bryophytes and lichens in alpine heath vegetation, Northern Sweden. Springerplus, 4(1), 95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kiefer, M. (1998). Deconstructing the Phoenix Mountain Preserve. Phoenix New Times. Retrieved August 16, 2019, from https://tinyurl.com/y4syza4o
  16. Korpilo, S., Virtanen, T., & Lehvävirta, S. (2017). Smartphone GPS tracking—Inexpensive and efficient data collection on recreational movement. Landscape and Urban Planning, 157, 608–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kutiel, P. (1999). Tendencies in the development of tracks in open areas. Environmental Management, 23(3), 401–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Landinfo. (2018). Prices. Retrieved August 14, 2019, from http://www.landinfo.com/prices.htm
  19. Leung, Y. F., Newburger, T., Jones, M., Kuhn, B., & Woiderski, B. (2011). Developing a monitoring protocol for visitor-created informal trails in Yosemite National Park, USA. Environmental Management, 47(1), 93–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lovich, J. E., & Bainbridge, D. (1999). Anthropogenic degradation of the southern California desert ecosystem and prospects for natural recovery and restoration. Environmental Management, 24(3), 309–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Marion, J. L., Leung, Y. F., & Nepal, S. K. (2006). Monitoring trail conditions: New methodological considerations. In The George Wright forum (Vol. 23, pp. 36–49). George Wright Society.Google Scholar
  22. Martin, R. H., Butler, D. R., & Klier, J. (2018). The influence of tire size on bicycle impacts to soil and vegetation. Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism, 24, 52–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. McAuliffe, J. R. (1994). Landscape evolution, soil formation, and ecological patterns and processes in Sonoran Desert bajadas. Ecological Monographs, 64(2), 111–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. McGarigal, K., & Marks, B. J. (1995). FRAGSTATS: spatial pattern analysis program for quantifying landscape structure. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-351. Portland, OR: US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. 122 p, 351.Google Scholar
  25. McGarigal, K., & Romme, W. H. (2012). Modeling historical range of variability at a range of scales: An example application. In J. Wiens, G. Hayward, H. Safford, & C. Giffen (Eds.), Historical environmental variation in conservation and natural resource management (pp. 128–146). Hoboken: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. McGivney, A. (2019). Yanked from the ground’: Cactus theft is ravaging the American desert. The Guardian. Retrieved August 12, 2019,from https://tinyurl.com/y2hk6r4l
  27. Odegard, K. (2014). Forest crime: Thieves steal plans, moss, fungi, damage environment. Albany Democrat-Herald. Retrieved August 15, 2019, from https://tinyurl.com/y6ep5oye
  28. Pescott, O. L., & Stewart, G. B. (2014). Assessing the impact of human trampling on vegetation: A systematic review and meta-analysis of experimental evidence. PeerJ, 2, e360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Pickering, C. M., & Growcock, A. J. (2009). Impacts of experimental trampling on tall alpine herbfields and subalpine grasslands in the Australian Alps. Journal of Environmental Management, 91(2), 532–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Pickering, C. M., & Norman, P. (2017). Comparing impacts between formal and informal recreational trails. Journal of Environmental Management, 193, 270–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rothwell, S. (2014). Background of acquisition of land for the Phoenix Mountain Preserves and how Phoenix Mountain Preservation Council (PMPC) was able to influence the land acquisition program. Phoenix Mountains Preservation Council. Retrieved August 27, 2019, from https://tinyurl.com/yxamlj7a
  32. Wahl, J. (2016). Man rescued after hiking North Mountain with beer, no water. 12 News. Retrieved August 12, 2019, from https://tinyurl.com/y696u9ys
  33. Walden-Schreiner, C., & Leung, Y. F. (2013). Spatially characterizing visitor use and its association with informal trails in Yosemite Valley meadows. Environmental Management, 52(1), 163–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Westcott, F., & Andrew, M. E. (2015). Spatial and environmental patterns of off-road vehicle recreation in a semi-arid woodland. Applied Geography, 62, 97–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Willard, B. E., Cooper, D. J., & Forbes, B. C. (2007). Natural regeneration of alpine tundra vegetation after human trampling: A 42-year data set from Rocky Mountain National Park, Colorado, USA. Arctic, Antarctic, and Alpine Research, 39(1), 177–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wimpey, J., & Marion, J. L. (2011). A spatial exploration of informal trail networks within Great Falls Park, VA. Journal of Environmental Management, 92(3), 1012–1022a.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tony H. Grubesic
    • 1
  • Jake R. Nelson
    • 1
  1. 1.Geoinformatics and Policy Analytics Lab (GPAL), School of InformationUniversity of Texas at AustinAustinUSA

Personalised recommendations