The Mechanical and Thermal Response of Shape Memory Alloy-Reinforced Aluminum Nanocomposites

  • M. Penchal ReddyEmail author
  • Vyasaraj Manakari
  • Gururaj Parande
  • R. A. Shakoor
  • T. S. Srivatsan
  • Manoj GuptaEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the The Minerals, Metals & Materials Series book series (MMMS)


The concept of developing intelligent materials that has the innate capability of healing its damage has engineered considerable scientific and even technological interest due on account of its potential for selection and use in sectors spanning aerospace, automotive, and even commercial products. Aluminium (Al) with its noteworthy properties, such as high specific strength (σ/ρ), low coefficient of thermal expansion, high thermal conductivity and good wear resistance characteristics is an ideal candidate for engineering the development of self-healing materials. In this paper, shape memory alloy [Ni50Ti50 (NiTi)]-reinforced aluminum matrix nanocomposites [referred to henceforth through the text as SMA-AMNCs] were fabricated using the technique of powder metallurgy followed by hybrid microwave sintering. The intrinsic influence of addition of nanosized particles of the chosen alloy (NiTi) on microstructural development, mechanical properties and even thermal properties of the chosen aluminum are examined. With the addition of nanoparticles of the shape memory alloy (NiTi), a noticeable improvement in hardness, ultimate compression/tensile strength [σ UTS], yield strength [σYS], damping capacity (Q-1) and damping loss rate (L) was observed, with a concurrent decrease in the values of failure strain (εf) and coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE). The observed increase in properties of the engineered nanocomposite as a consequence of contributions from intrinsic microstructural effects is neatly presented and briefly discussed.


Aluminum-shape memory alloy nanocomposites Microwave sintering Extrusion Mechanical properties Thermal property Damping behavior 


  1. 1.
    Matli PR, Ubaid F, Shakoor RA, Parande G, Manakari V, Yusuf M, Mohamed AMA, Gupta M (2017) Improved properties of Al–Si3N4 nanocomposites fabricated through a microwave sintering and hot extrusion process. RSC Adv 7(55):34401–34410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Zhang Y, Ma N, Wang H, Le Y, Li X (2007) Damping capacity of in situ TiB2 particulates reinforced aluminium composites with Ti addition. Mater Des 28(2):628–632CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jayalakshmi S, Gupta S, Sankaranarayanan S, Sahu S, Gupta M (2013) Structural and mechanical properties of Ni60Nb40 amorphous alloy particle reinforced Al-based composites produced by microwave-assisted rapid sintering. Mater Sci Eng, A 581:119–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Reddy MP, Shakoor R, Parande G, Manakari V, Ubaid F, Mohamed A, Gupta M (2017) Enhanced performance of nano-sized SiC reinforced Al metal matrix nanocomposites synthesized through microwave sintering and hot extrusion techniques. Progress Natural Sci: Mater Int 27(5):606–614CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Reddy MP, Ubaid F, Shakoor R, Parande G, Manakari V, Mohamed A, Gupta M (2017) Effect of reinforcement concentration on the properties of hot extruded Al-Al2O3 composites synthesized through microwave sintering process. Mater Sci Eng, A 696:60–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Moazami-Goudarzi M, Akhlaghi F (2016) Wear behavior of Al 5252 alloy reinforced with micrometric and nanometric SiC particles. Tribol Int 102:28–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Reddy MP, Himyan M, Ubaid F, Shakoor R, Vyasaraj M, Gururaj P, Yusuf M, Mohamed A, Gupta M (2018) Enhancing thermal and mechanical response of aluminum using nanolength scale TiC ceramic reinforcement. Ceram Int 44(8):9247–9254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Reddy MP, Manakari V, Parande G, Ubaid F, Shakoor R, Mohamed A, Gupta M (2018) Enhancing compressive, tensile, thermal and damping response of pure Al using BN nanoparticles. J Alloy Compd 762:398–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Byrne CJ, Eldrup M (2008) Bulk metallic glasses. Science 321(5888):502–503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Reddy MP, Ubaid F, Shakoor R, Mohamed A (2018) Microstructure and mechanical behavior of microwave Sintered Cu 50 Ti 50 amorphous alloy reinforced Al metal matrix composites. JOM 70(6):817–822CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Scudino S, Surreddi K, Sager S, Sakaliyska M, Kim J, Löser W, Eckert J (2008) Production and mechanical properties of metallic glass-reinforced Al-based metal matrix composites. J Mater Sci 43(13):4518–4526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chau E, Friend C, Allen D, Hora J, Webster J (2006) A technical and economic appraisal of shape memory alloys for aerospace applications. Mater Sci Eng, A 438:589–592CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hao S, Cui L, Jiang J, Guo F, Xiao X, Jiang D, Yu C, Chen Z, Zhou H, Wang Y (2014) A novel multifunctional NiTi/Ag hierarchical composite. Sci Reports 4:5267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ni D, Wang J, Zhou Z, Ma Z (2014) Fabrication and mechanical properties of bulk NiTip/Al composites prepared by friction stir processing. J Alloy Compd 586:368–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Parande G, Manakari V, Wakeel S, Kujur M, Gupta M (2018) Enhancing mechanical response of Monolithic Magnesium Using Nano-NiTi (Nitinol) particles. Metals 8(12):1014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sankaranarayanan S, Shankar VH, Jayalakshmi S, Bau NQ, Gupta M (2015) Development of high performance magnesium composites using Ni50Ti50 metallic glass reinforcement and microwave sintering approach. J Alloy Compd 627:192–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hu J, Zhang Q, Wu G, Liu Y, Li D (2014) Effect of pre-oxidation of TiNi fibers on the interfacial and mechanical property of TiNif/Al composite. Mater Sci Eng, A 597:20–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wang Z, Dong P, Wang W, Yan Z, Ding M (2017) Interface formation of TiNif/Al composites fabricated by spark plasma sintering. J Alloy Compd 726:507–513CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Thakur SK, Tun KS, Gupta M (2010) Enhancing uniform, nonuniform, and total failure strain of aluminum by using SiC at nanolength scale. J Eng Mater Technol 132(4):041002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Czeppe T, Levintant-Zayonts N, Swiatek Z, Michalec M, Bonchyk O, Savitskij G (2009) Inhomogeneous structure of near-surface layers in the ion-implanted NiTi alloy. Vacuum 83:S214–S219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Parande G, Manakari V, Meenashisundaram GK, Gupta M (2016) Enhancing the hardness/compression/damping response of magnesium by reinforcing with biocompatible silica nanoparticulates. Int J Mater Res 107(12):1091–1099CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Nguyen Q, Gupta M (2008) Enhancing compressive response of AZ31B magnesium alloy using alumina nanoparticulates. Composites Science and Technology 68(10–11):2185–2192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hassan S, Gupta M (2003) Development of high strength magnesium copper based hybrid composites with enhanced tensile properties. Mater Sci Technol 19(2):253–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Penchal Reddy
    • 1
    Email author
  • Vyasaraj Manakari
    • 1
  • Gururaj Parande
    • 1
  • R. A. Shakoor
    • 2
  • T. S. Srivatsan
    • 3
  • Manoj Gupta
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringNational University of SingaporeSingaporeSingapore
  2. 2.Center for Advanced Materials, Qatar UniversityDohaQatar
  3. 3.Department of Mechanical EngineeringThe University of AkronAkronUSA

Personalised recommendations