Advertisement

The Life and Work of a Manual Sugarcane Harvester

  • Terry-Ann JonesEmail author
Chapter
  • 4 Downloads
Part of the Mobility & Politics book series (MPP)

Abstract

This chapter highlights the labor dimension of the sugarcane industry and examines the relationship among the workers, recruiters, and owners, vis-à-vis the hierarchical structure that was established during Brazil’s colonial period. Within the sugarcane industry, manual cane harvesting is arguably the most dangerous and physically difficult type of work. It is also the type of work that offers the lowest wages. Injuries occur with frequency, as workers are often inadequately equipped for the inherent danger of rapidly slashing stalks of sugarcane with machetes. Cane cutters contend with excessive sun exposure, dehydration, and exhaustion, which have caused a number of deaths in the cane fields. Not surprisingly, it is the task that is generally reserved for migrant workers. This chapter also discusses housing accommodations and living conditions, as well as the range of health problems that workers endure, such as respiratory illnesses and chronic renal failure.

Keywords

Working conditions Housing Health Sugarcane burning Mechanization Recruiters 

References

  1. Alexander, Herbert B. 1922. Brazilian and United States Slavery Compared. The Journal of Negro History 7 (4): 349–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amann, Edmund, Werner Baer, and Donald V. Coes. 2011. Energy, Bio Fuels and Development: Comparing Brazil and the United States. Abingdon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andrade, Renata Marson Teixeira de, and Andrew Miccolis. 2011. Policies and Institutional and Legal Frameworks in the Expansion of Brazilian Biofuels. Report. Center for International Forestry Research. https://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep02306
  4. Araújo, Tânia Bacelar de, and Paulo Simões. 2004. Northeast, Northeasts, What Northeast? Latin American Perspectives 31 (2), Brazilian Northeast: Globalization, Labor, and Poverty: 16–41.Google Scholar
  5. Baptista, Emerson Augusto, Guy J. Abel, and Járvis Campos. 2018. Internal Migration in Brazil Using Circular Visualization. Regional Studies, Regional Science 5 (1): 361–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barbosa, Cristiane Maria Galvão, Mário Terra-Filho, André Luis Pereira de Albuquerque, Dante Di Giorgi, Cesar Grupi, Carlos Eduardo Negrão, Maria Urbana Pinto Brandão Rondon, Daniel Godoy Martinez, Tania Marcourakis, Fabiana Almeida dos Santos, Alfesio Luis Ferreira Braga, Dirce Maria Trevisan Zanetta, and Ubiratan de Paula Santos. 2012. Burnt Sugarcane Harvesting – Cardiovascular Effects on a Group of Healthy Workers, Brazil. Plos One 7 (9): e46142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bento, Maria Aparecida Silva. 1999. Silent Conflict: Discriminatory Practices and Black Responses in the Workplace. In Race in Contemporary Brazil: From Indifference to Inequality, ed. Rebecca Lynn Reichmann. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Binford, Leigh. 2012. Tomorrow We’re All Going to the Harvest: Temporary Foreign Worker Programs and Neoliberal Political Economy. 1st ed. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  9. Coslovsky, Salo V., and Richard Locke. 2013. Parallel Paths to Enforcement: Private Compliance, Public Regulation, and Labor Standards in the Brazilian Sugar Sector. Politics and Society 41 (4): 497–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dabat, Christine Rufino, and Thomas D. Rogers. 2017. Sugarcane Workers in Search of Justice: Rural Labour Through the Lens of the State. International Review of Social History 62 (S25): 217–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Eaglin, Jennifer. 2015. Sweet Fuel: Ethanol’s Socio-Political Origins in Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, 1933–1985. Doctoral Diss., Michigan State University.Google Scholar
  12. Ekiti, Martin E., Felix K. Jean-Berthelot Zambo, Valirie N. Assah, Krystel Kekay Agbor, and Gloria Ashuntantang. 2018. Chronic Kidney Disease in Sugarcane Workers in Cameroon: A Cross-Sectional Study. (Report). BMC Nephrology 19 (1): 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fischlowitz, Estanislau, and Oscar Uribe Villegas. 1962. Internal Migration in Brazil. Revista Mexicana de Sociología 24 (3): 705–733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. França, Daniela, Karla Longo, Bernardo Rudorff, Daniel Aguiar, Saulo Freitas, Rafael Stockler, and Gabriel Pereira. 2014. Pre-harvest Sugarcane Burning Emission Inventories Based on Remote Sensing Data in the State of São Paulo, Brazil. Atmospheric Environment 99: 446–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fredrickson, George M. 2016. Diverse Nations: Explorations in the History of Racial and Ethnic Pluralism. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Galloway, J.H. 1971. The Last Years of Slavery on the Sugar Plantations of Northeastern Brazil. The Hispanic American Historical Review 51 (4): 586–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Goza, Franklin, Eduardo Rios-Neto, and Donald McQuarie. 1997. The Labor Process among Temporary Workers in the São Paulo Sugar Industry. Critical Sociology 23 (3): 33–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hugo, V. 2007. Brazilian Cane Cutter Died from Working 70 Days Without Break. https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2007/06/cane-j02.html
  19. Jesus, Deberson F., Olivier Genevieve, and Ben Richardson. 2016. Violations of Labour and Environmental Law by Sugarcane Mills in São Paulo State, Brazil. Ethical Sugar, May. https://warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/pais/people/richardson/publications/ethical_sugar_-_violations_of_labour_and_environmental_law_by_sugarcane_mills_in_sao_paulo.pdf. Accessed 15 Aug 2019.
  20. Jones, Terry-Ann. 2009. Migration Theory in the Domestic Context: North-South Labor Movement in Brazil. Human Architecture: Journal of the Sociology of Self-Knowledge VII (4): 5–14.Google Scholar
  21. Kaup, Felix. 2015. The Sugarcane Complex in Brazil: The Role of Innovation in a Dynamic Sector on Its Path Towards Sustainability. London: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Luz, Verônica Gronau, Heleno Rodrigues Corrêa Filho, Alessandro José Nunes da Silva, Erivelton Fontana de Laat, Rodolfo Andrade de Gouveia Vilela, Fernando Oliveira Catanho da Silva, and Lia Thieme Oikawa Zangirolani. 2012. Migrant Labor and Wear-out in Manual Sugar Cane Harvesting in São Paulo, Brazil. Ciencia & Saude Coletiva 17 (10): 2831–2840.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Martine, George R. 1971. Internal Migration in Brazil, 1890–1970. Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica Para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).Google Scholar
  24. Martinelli, Luiz A., and Solange Filoso. 2008. Expansion of Sugarcane Ethanol Production in Brazil: Environmental and Social Challenges. Ecological Applications 18 (4): 885–898.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Menezes, Marilda Aparecida de, Marcelo Saturnino da Silva, and Maciel Cover. 2012. Migrant Workers in Sugarcane Mills: A Study of Social Networks and Recruitment Intermediaries in Brazil. Agrarian South: Journal of Political Economy 1 (2): 161–180.Google Scholar
  26. Mintz, Sidney W. 1985. Sweetness and Power: The Place of Sugar in Modern History. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
  27. Moraes, Marcia Azanha Ferraz Dias de. 2011. Determinants of the Income of Workers in Sugar Cane Plantations and in the Sugar and Ethanol Industries in the North-Northeast and Center-South Regions of Brazil. In Energy, Bio Fuels and Development: Comparing Brazil and the United States, ed. Edmund Amann, Werner Baer, and Donald V. Coes. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  28. Nicolella, Alexandre C., and Walter Belluzzo. 2011. Impact of Reducing the Pre-Harvest Burning of Sugar-Cane Area on Respiratory Health in Brazil. Paper Presented at the Anais Do XXXVIII Encontro Nacional de Economia. Proceedings of the 38th Brazilian Economics Meeting.Google Scholar
  29. Nicolella, Alexandre, and Walter Belluzzo. 2014. The Effect of Reducing the Pre-Harvest Burning of Sugar Cane on Respiratory Health in Brazil. Environment and Development Economics 20 (1): 127–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ortiz, Sutti. 2002. Laboring in the Factories and in the Fields. Annual Review of Anthropology 31: 395–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pereira, Anthony W. 1992. Agrarian Reform and the Rural Workers’ Unions of the Pernambuco Sugar Zone, Brazil 1985–1988. The Journal of Developing Areas 26 (2): 169–192.Google Scholar
  32. Priuli, Roseana Mara Aredes, Maria Silvia de Moraes, and Rafael Morais Chiaravalloti. 2014. The Impact of Stress on the Health of Sugar Cane Cutters. Revista de Saude Publica 48 (2): 225–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rezende, Gervásio Castro de, and Ana Cecília Kreter. 2001. Agricultural Labor Legislation and Poverty in Brazil: A Transaction Costs Approach. Rev. de Economia Agrícola, São Paulo 54 (2): 121–137.Google Scholar
  34. Rocha, Fernanda Ludmilla Rossi, Maria Helena Palucci Marziale, and Oi-Saeng Hong. 2010. Work and Health Conditions of Sugar Cane Workers in Brazil. Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP 44 (4): 978–983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rosendo, Jussara dos Santos, and Patrícia Francisca de Matos. 2017. Social Impacts with the End of the Manual Sugarcane Harvest: A Case Study in Brazil. Sociology International Journal 1 (4): 121–125.Google Scholar
  36. Rout, Leslie. 1976. Race and Slavery in Brazil. The Wilson Quarterly 1 (1): 73–89.Google Scholar
  37. Saint, William S. 1981. The Wages of Modernization: A Review of the Literature on Temporary Labor Arrangements in Brazilian Agriculture. Latin American Research Review 16 (3): 91–110.Google Scholar
  38. Santos, Paula Ubiratan, Dirce Maria T. Zanetta, Mário Terra-Filho, and Emmanuel A. Burdmann. 2015. Burnt Sugarcane Harvesting is Associated with Acute Renal Dysfunction. Kidney International 87 (4): 792–799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Silva, Maria Aparecida de Moraes, and Rodrigo Constante Martins. 2010. A degradacão social do trabalho e da natureza no contexto da monocultura canavieira paulista. Sociologias 12 (24): 196–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Uriarte, María, Charles B. Yackulic, Tamar Cooper, Dan Flynn, Marina Cortes, Tanja Crk, Georgina Cullman, Meghan Mcginty, and Jason Sircely. 2009. Expansion of Sugarcane Production in São Paulo, Brazil: Implications for Fire Occurrence and Respiratory Health. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 132 (1–2): 48–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Van Rompaey, Karen. 2008. The Political Economy of Agrofuels and the Contested Meaning of Sustainable Development. Unpublished Master’s Thesis.Google Scholar
  42. Veronezzi, Fernando. 2015. Claims of Rural Workers Employed Sugarcane Plantation: The Strike in Guariba of 1984 and the Struggle for Land Within the State of São Paulo/as reivindicacoes dos trabalhadores rurais assalariados da lavoura canavieira: a greve de guariba de 1984 e a luta por terra no interior do estado de sao paulo. Geo Uerj 26.  https://doi.org/10.12957/geouerj.2015.8252.
  43. Wegman, David H., Jenny Apelqvist, Matteo Bottai, Ulf Ekström, Ramón García-Trabanino, Jason Glaser, Christer Hogstedt, Kristina Jakobbson, Emmanuel Jarquín, Rebekah A.I. Lucas, Ilana Weiss, Cathatina Wesseling, Theo Bodin, et al. 2018. Intervention to Diminish Dehydration and Kidney Damage Among Sugarcane Workers. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health 44 (1): 16–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Welch, Cliff. 1999. The Seed Was Planted: The São Paulo Roots of Brazil’s Rural Labor Movement, 1924–1964. University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
  45. ———. 2006. Globalization and the Transformation of Work in Rural Brazil: Agribusiness, Rural Labor Unions, and Peasant Mobilization. International Labor and Working-Class History 70, Globalization and the Latin-American Workplace: 35–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wesseling, Catharina, Aurora Aragón, Marvin González, Ilana Weiss, Jason Glaser, Norma A. Bobadilla, Carlos Roncal-Jiménez, Ricardo Correa-Rotter, Richard J. Johnson, and Lars Barregard. 2016. Kidney Function in Sugarcane Cutters in Nicaragua – A Longitudinal Study of Workers at Risk of Mesoamerican Nephropathy. Environmental Research 147 (May): 125–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wolford, Wendy. 2004. Of Land and Labor: Agrarian Reform on the Sugarcane Plantations of Northeast Brazil. Latin American Perspectives 31 (2): 147–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Sociology and AnthropologyFairfield UniversityFairfieldUSA

Personalised recommendations