Advertisement

The Unintended Consequences of Public Reporting

  • Samer A. M. NashefEmail author
Chapter
  • 22 Downloads

Abstract

As other chapters in this book so eloquently demonstrate, the field of pediatric cardiology and cardiac surgery is one that is fraught with bioethical controversy. This moral maze, already difficult to navigate, has become even more hazardous with the addition of a new dragon which has arisen out of the pitfalls of transparency. Better and more complete data collection in cardiology and cardiac surgery generally has led to increasingly clamorous demands for the outcome data to be published, so that patients are better able to choose who operates on them and where. With the best intentions in mind, the medical profession in many advanced nations has, at times enthusiastically and at others reluctantly, increasingly complied with these demands. Transparency is, of course, ‘a good thing’ but the law of unintended consequences has come into play and certain highly undesirable behaviors have appeared which have caused damage to patients and doctors alike.

Keywords

Surgery Ethics Transparency Outcome reporting Clinical risk 

References

  1. 1.
    Landsberger HA. Hawthorne revisited. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press; 1958.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Nashef S. The naked surgeon. London and Melbourne: Scribe; 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Nashef SAM, Roques F, Sharples LD, Nilsson J, Smith C, Goldstone AR. EuroSCORE II. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2012;41:734–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Shahian DM, O’Brien SM, Filardo G, Ferraris VA, Haan CK, Rich JB, Normand SL, ER DL, Shewan CM, Dokholyan RS, Peterson ED, Edwards FH, Anderson RP, The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Cardiac surgery risk models: part 1—coronary artery bypass grafting surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2008;2009(88):S2–22.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    O’Brien SM, Shahian DM, Filardo G, Ferraris VA, Haan CK, Rich JB, Normand S-LT, Delong ER, Shewan CM, Dokholyan RS, Peterson ED, Edwards FH, Richard P, Anderson RP, The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Cardiac surgery risk models: part 2—isolated valve surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2008;2009(88):S23–42.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jenkins KJ, Gauvreau K, Newburger JW, Spray TL, Moller JH, Iezzoni LI. Consensus-based method for risk adjustment for surgery for congenital heart disease. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2002;123:110–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lacour-Gayet F, Clarke D, Jacobs J, Comas J, Daebritz S, Daenen W, Gaynor W, Hamilton L, Jacobs M, Maruszsewski B, Pozzi M, Spray T, Stellin G, Tchervenkov C, Mavroudis CA. The Aristotle score: a complexity-adjusted method to evaluate surgical results. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2004;25:911–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Royal Papworth HospitalCambridgeUK

Personalised recommendations