Advertisement

Agile in the Era of Digitalization: A Finnish Survey Study

  • Petri KettunenEmail author
  • Maarit Laanti
  • Fabian Fagerholm
  • Tommi Mikkonen
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11915)

Abstract

Agile software development has been applied since the early 2000s. It is now mainstream industrial practice in information and communication technology (ICT) companies and IT organizations. However, recently increasing and even disruptive digitalization has brought new drivers and needs for agility both in software organizations as well as in traditional companies, which are becoming more and more software-intensive. Following that line of developments, based on our recent survey conducted in Finland in 2018, in this paper we explore the current state of the affairs with respect to how different organizations currently address agility and agile development in both IT and non-software industrial sectors. The results show that operative goals (productivity, quality) are considered the most important ones to achieve by agile means. Scrum, Kanban and DevOps are the most frequently reported methods, and SAFe is the dominant scaling model. Lead time metrics are the most typically followed measurements. The operative goals as well as responsiveness are also the most highly ranked future aims. The impacts of digitalization are considered substantial but agile developments are seen to address them well. As a conclusion of this survey study, there is no “one agile way” for all. Different organizations seem to emphasize multiple aspects of agility when they develop, adapt and even transform themselves. Yet, also many commonalities were indicated.

Keywords

Agile software development Enterprise agility Transformation Digitalization Survey 

References

  1. 1.
    Kettunen, P., Laanti, M.: Future software organizations – agile goals and roles. Eur. J. Futures Res. 5, 16 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kettunen, P.: Systematizing software-development agility: toward an enterprise capability improvement framework. J. Enterp. Transform. 2(2), 81–104 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Laanti, M.: Agile transformation model for large software development organizations. In: Tonelli, R., (ed.) Proceedings of the XP2017 Scientific Workshops, Article No. 19. ACM, New York (2017)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mishra, A., Garbajosa, J., Wang, X., Bosch, J., Abrahamsson, P.: Future directions in Agile research: alignment and divergence between research and practice. J. Softw. Evol. Proc. 29, e1884 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ronzon, T., Buck, J., Eckstein, J.: Making companies nimble – from software agility to business agility. IEEE Softw. 36(1), 79–85 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Prikladnicki, R., Lassenius, C., Carver, J.C.: Trends in agile: perspectives from the practitioners. IEEE Softw. 33(6), 20–22 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Prikladnicki, R., Lassenius, C., Carver, J.C.: Trends in agile: from operational to strategic agility. IEEE Softw. 36(1), 95–97 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kettunen, P., Laanti, M., Fagerholm, F., Mikkonen, T., Männistö, T.: Finnish enterprise agile transformations: a survey study. In: Hoda, R. (ed.) XP 2019. LNBIP, vol. 364, pp. 97–104. Springer, Cham (2019).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30126-2_12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Laanti, M., Kettunen, P.: SAFe adoptions in Finland: a survey research. In: Hoda, R. (ed.) XP 2019. LNBIP, vol. 364, pp. 81–87. Springer, Cham (2019).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30126-2_10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hoda, R., Salleh, N., Grundy, J.: The rise and evolution of agile software development. IEEE Softw. 35(5), 58–63 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ebert, C., Paasivaara, M.: Scaling agile. IEEE Softw. 34(6), 98–103 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kalenda, M., Hyna, P., Rossi, B.: Scaling agile in large organizations: practices, challenges, and success factors. J. Softw. Evol. Proc. 30, e1954 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dikert, K., Paasivaara, M., Lassenius, C.: Challenges and success factors for large-scale agile transformations: a systematic literature review. J. Syst. Softw. 119, 87–108 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Version One 13th Annual State of Agile Report. https://stateofagile.versionone.com. Accessed 21 May 2019
  15. 15.
    Knauss, E.: The missing requirements perspective in large-scale agile system development. IEEE Softw. 36(3), 9–13 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Prikladnicki, R., Lassenius, C., Carver, J.C.: Trends in agile updated: perspectives from the practitioners. IEEE Softw. 35(1), 109–111 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Goldman, S.L., Nagel, R.N., Preiss, K.: Agile Competitors and Virtual Organizations: Strategies for Enriching the Customer. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York (1995)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Conboy, K.: Agility from first principles: reconstructing the concept of agility in information systems development. Inf. Syst. Res. 20(3), 329–354 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Abrahamsson, P., Conboy, K., Wang, X.: ‘Lots done, more to do’: the current state of agile systems development research. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 18, 281–284 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Dingsøyr, T., Dybå, T., Abrahamsson, P.: A preliminary roadmap for empirical research on agile software development. In: Melnik, G., Kruchten, P., Poppendieck, M. (eds.) Proceedings of the Agile 2008 Conference, pp. 83–94. IEEE, Los Alamistos (2008)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Moe, N.B., Dingsøyr, T.: Emerging research themes and updated research agenda for large-scale agile development: a summary of the 5th international workshop at XP2017. In: Tonelli, R., (ed.) Proceedings of the XP2017 Scientific Workshops, Article No. 14. ACM, New York (2017)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Laanti, M., Salo, O., Abrahamsson, P.: Agile methods rapidly replacing traditional methods at Nokia: a survey of opinions on agile transformation. Inf. Softw. Technol. 53(3), 276–290 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kuhrmann, M., et al.: Hybrid software development approaches in practice: a European perspective. IEEE Softw. 36(4), 20–31 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Rodríguez, P., Markkula, J., Oivo, M., Turula, K.: Survey on agile and lean usage in finnish software industry. In: Runeson, P., Höst, M., Mendes, E., Andrews, A., Harrison, R. (eds.) ESEM 2012 ACM-IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement, pp. 139–148. ACM, New York (2012)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
  26. 26.
    Version One 12th Annual State of Agile Report. https://stateofagile.versionone.com. Accessed 10 Mar 2019
  27. 27.
    Kupiainen, E., Mäntylä, M.V., Itkonen, J.: Using metrics in agile and lean software development – a systematic literature review of industrial studies. Inf. Softw. Technol. 62, 143–163 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Alahyari, H., Berntsson Svensson, R., Gorschek, T.: A study of value in agile software development organizations. J. Syst. Softw. 125, 271–288 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Computer ScienceUniversity of HelsinkiHelsinkiFinland
  2. 2.Nitor DeltaHelsinkiFinland
  3. 3.Blekinge University of TechnologyKarlskronaSweden

Personalised recommendations