Advertisement

Implementing Ethics in AI: Initial Results of an Industrial Multiple Case Study

  • Ville VakkuriEmail author
  • Kai-Kristian Kemell
  • Pekka Abrahamsson
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11915)

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is becoming increasingly widespread in system development endeavors. As AI systems affect various stakeholders due to their unique nature, the growing influence of these systems calls for ethical considerations. Academic discussion and practical examples of autonomous system failures have highlighted the need for implementing ethics in software development. However, research on methods and tools for implementing ethics into AI system design and development in practice is still lacking. This paper begins to address this focal problem by providing elements needed for producing a baseline for ethics in AI based software development. We do so by means of an industrial multiple case study on AI systems development in the healthcare sector. Using a research model based on extant, conceptual AI ethics literature, we explore the current state of practice out on the field in the absence of formal methods and tools for ethically aligned design.

Keywords

Artificial intelligence AI ethics AI development Responsibility Accountability Transparency Behavioral software engineering 

References

  1. 1.
    Charisi, V., et al.: Towards moral autonomous systems. arXiv preprint arXiv:1703.04741 (2017)
  2. 2.
    Flores, A.W., Bechtel, K., Lowenkamp, C.T.: False positives, false negatives, and false analyses: a rejoinder to “machine bias: there’s software used across the country to predict future criminals, and it’s biased against blacks”. Fed. Probation 80(2), 38 (2016)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    McNamara, A., Smith, J., Murphy-Hill, E.: Does ACM’S code of ethics change ethical decision making in software development? In: Proceedings of the 2018 26th ACM ESEC/FSE, ESEC/FSE 2018, pp. 729–733. ACM, New York (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1145/3236024.3264833
  4. 4.
    Lenberg, P., Feldt, R., Wallgren, L.G.: Behavioral software engineering: a definition and systematic literature review. J. Syst. Softw. 107, 15–37 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2015.04.084CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fitzgerald, B., Hartnett, G., Conboy, K.: Customising agile methods to software practices at Intel Shannon. EJIS 15(2), 200–213 (2006).  https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dignum, V.: Responsible autonomy. arXiv preprint arXiv:1706.02513 (2017)
  7. 7.
    Turilli, M., Floridi, L.: The ethics of information transparency. Ethics Inf. Tecnol. 11(2), 105–112 (2009).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-009-9187-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ethically aligned design: a vision for prioritizing human wellbeing with autonomous and intelligent systems, first edition (2019). https://standards.ieee.org/content/ieee-standards/en/industryconnections/ec/autonomous-systems.html
  9. 9.
    Ethics Commission’s complete report on automated and connected driving (2017). https://www.bmvi.de/SharedDocs/EN/publications/report-ethics-commission.html
  10. 10.
  11. 11.
    Dignum, V.: Ethics in artificial intelligence: introduction to the special issue. Ethics Inf. Technol. 20(1), 1–3 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-018-9450-zMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Galletta, A.: Mastering the Semi-Structured Interview and Beyond: From Research Design to Analysis and Publication, vol. 18. NYU Press, New York (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Strauss, A., Corbin, J.: Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory, 2nd edn. Sage Publications Inc., Thousand Oaks (1998)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Heath, H., Cowley, S.: Developing a grounded theory approach: a comparison of Glaser and Strauss. Int. J. Nurs. Stud. 41(2), 141–150 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Abrahamsson, P.: Commitment nets in software process improvement. Ann. Softw. Eng. 14(1), 407–438 (2002).  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020526329708CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Vakkuri, V., Kemell, K., Kultanen, J., Siponen, M.T., Abrahamsson, P.: Ethically Aligned Design of Autonomous Systems: industry viewpoint and an empirical study. arXiv preprint arXiv:1906.07946 (2019)
  17. 17.
    Gotel, O., et al.: Traceability fundamentals. In: Cleland-Huang, J., Gotel, O., Zisman, A. (eds.) Software and Systems Traceability, pp. 3–22. Springer, London (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-2239-5_1CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of JyväskyläJyväskyläFinland

Personalised recommendations