Advertisement

Using Soft Computing Methods for the Functional Benchmarking of an Intelligent Workplace in an Educational Establishment

  • Gurru I. AkperovEmail author
  • Vladimir V. Khramov
  • Anastasiya A. Gorbacheva
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 1095)

Abstract

The article describes a method developed for assessing the functional proximity of an intelligent workplace (IWP) of a student with the best available examples based on a fuzzy multiple attribute decision-making method. The developed method is aimed at evaluating the success of the learning process and consists in aggregating individual indicators of the reviewed functions. The proposed method demonstrates the possibility of adapting the standard integral score method used to estimate the IWP to fuzzy initial data, thus providing a number of major advantages. In particular, the proposed method allows us to change the entire complex of the studied functions and their parameters depending on the study goals and objectives without substantially reworking the model. Besides, we can adjust the weights of parameters to match the sectoral and territorial specificity of the university or to comply with the expert assessments; bring together quantitative and qualitative estimates of the IWP indicators with the corresponding estimates of several intelligent learning tools selected as templates.

Keywords

Comparative analysis of enterprise data Integrated assessment Aggregation Fuzzy multiple attribute decision-making methods 

References

  1. 1.
    Serdyuchenko, P.Ya., Khramov, V.V.: Principles of fuzzy aggregation in the management of complex systems. In: The Collection: Problems of Ensuring the Efficiency and Sustainability of Complex Technical Systems XIX Interdepartmental Scientific and Technical Conference, pp. 288–291 (2000)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chernyshev, Yu.O., Khramov, V.V.: Features of the aggregation of qualitative features of reference points in vision systems. News TSE 3(21), 55 (2001). https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=12886334
  3. 3.
    Khramov, V.V.: Features of the majority processing of fuzzy information. In: The Collection: Spectral Methods of Information Processing in Scientific Research Reports of the All-Russian Conference 2000, pp. 136–138. RFBR, Institute of Mathematical Problems of Biology RAS (2000). https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=32656899
  4. 4.
    Danchenko, D.P., Khramov, V.V., Tsarkov, A.N.: Aggregation of several sources of fuzzy information in the ergatic system. In: The Collection: Problems of Ensuring the Efficiency and Stability of the Functioning of Complex Technical Systems Collection of Works, pp. 441–443 (2003). https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=32760833
  5. 5.
    Khramov, V.V.: Intelligent information systems: the presentation of knowledge in information systems. Teaching aid Rostov-on-Don (2011). https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=32762297
  6. 6.
    Khramov, V.V., Gvozdev, D.S.: Intellectual information systems: intellectual data analysis, p. 152. Rostov State University of Communications, Rostov-on-Don (2016). https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=28322733

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Private Educational Institution of Higher Education “SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY (IMBL)”Rostov-on-DonRussia

Personalised recommendations