Advertisement

Artificial Intelligence Based and Linear Conventional Techniques for Reference Evapotranspiration Modeling

  • Jazuli AbdullahiEmail author
  • Gozen Elkiran
  • Vahid Nourani
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 1095)

Abstract

This study was aimed at investigating the potentials of Artificial Neural Network (ANN), Support Vector Regression (SVR) and Multiple Linear Regression (MLR) techniques for the estimation of reference evapotranspiration (ET0) in a semiarid station of Nigeria. To do so, 34 years daily monthly average data including maximum, minimum and mean temperatures (Tmax, Tmin, and Tmean), relative humidity (RH) and wind speed (U2) were used as input parameters. Three models were developed from each technique using three different input combinations. FAO Penman Monteith method was used as the basis upon which the performances of the models were assessed. The results revealed that models developed using Tmin, Tmax and U2 produced better performance. The results also depicted that with the unique capability of each technique, different results would be obtained, both ANN and SVR models could lead to efficient and reliable results, but MLR model could not produce reliable performance due to its inability to deal with nonlinear aspect of ET0.

Keywords

Reference evapotranspiration Penman Monteith Nigeria 

References

  1. 1.
    Odhiambo, L.O., Yoder, R.E., Yoder, D.C.: Estimation of reference crop evapotranspiration using fuzzy state models. Trans. ASAE 44, 543–550 (2001)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Allen, R.G., Pereira, L.S., Raes, D., Smith, M.: Crop evapotranspiration-guidelines for computing crop water requirements. FAO Irrigation and drainage paper 56. FAO, Rome, 300(9) (1998)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ladlani, I., Houichi, L., Djemili, L., Heddam, S., Belouz, K.: Estimation of daily reference evapotranspiration (ET0) in the North of Algeria using adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) and multiple linear regression (MLR) models: a comparative study. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 39, 5959–5969 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-014-1151-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Abdullahi, J., Elkiran, G.: Prediction of the future impact of climate change on reference evapotranspiration in Cyprus using artificial neural network. In: 9th International Conference on Theory and Application of Soft Computing, Computing with Words and Perception, pp. 276–283. Elsevier, London (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2017.11.239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Antonopoulos, V.Z., Antonopoulos, A.V.: Daily reference evapotranspiration estimates by artificial neural networks technique and empirical equations using limited input climate variables. Comput. Electron. Agric. 132, 86–96 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2016.11.011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Yin, Z., Wen, X., Feng, Q., He, Z., Zou, S., Yang, L.: Integrating genetic algorithm and support vector machine for modeling daily reference evapotranspiration in a semi-arid mountain area. Hydrol. Res. 48, 1177–1191 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.2166/nh.2016.205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fan, J., Yue, W., Wu, L., Zhang, F., Cai, H., Wang, X., Xiang, Y.: Evaluation of SVM, ELM and four tree-based ensemble models for predicting daily reference evapotranspiration using limited meteorological data in different climates of China. Agric. For. Meteorol. 263, 225–241 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2018.08.019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Arku, A.Y., Musa, S.M., Mofoke, A.L.E.: Determination of water requirement and irrigation timing for Amaranthus hybridus in Maiduguri metropolis, north-eastern Nigeria. In: Fourth International Conference on Sustainable Irrigation, pp. 279–289. WIT Press, England (2012).  https://doi.org/10.2495/si120241
  9. 9.
    Elkiran, G., Nourani, V., Abba, S.I., Abdullahi, J.: Artificial intelligence-based approaches for multi-station modelling of dissolve oxygen in river. Global J. Environ. Sci. Manag. 4, 439–450 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.22034/gjesm.2018.04.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Legates, D.R., McCabe Jr., G.J.: Evaluating the use of “goodness-of-fit” measures in hydrologic and hydroclimatic model validation. Water Resour. Res. 35, 233–241 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Abdullahi, J., Elkiran, G., Nourani, V.: Application of Artificial Neural Network to predict reference evapotranspiration in Famagusta, North Cyprus. In: 11th International Scientific Conference on Production Engineering Development and Modernization of Production, pp. 549–554 (2017)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cortes, C., Vapnik, V.: Support-vector networks. Mach. Learn. 20, 273–297 (1995)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Nourani, V., Elkiran, G., Abba, S.I.: Wastewater treatment plant performance analysis using artificial intelligence–an ensemble approach. Water Sci. Technol. 78, 2064–2076 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2018.477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nourani, V., Elkiran, G., Abdullahi, J., Tahsin, A.: Multi-region modeling of daily global solar radiation with artificial intelligence ensemble. Nat. Resour. Res. 28, 1217–1238 (2019).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11053-018-09450-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Civil and Environmental EngineeringNear East UniversityNicosiaTurkey
  2. 2.Department of Water Resources Engineering, Faculty of Civil EngineeringUniversity of TabrizTabrizIran

Personalised recommendations