Advertisement

Towards Model-Based Characterization of Biomechanical Tumor Growth Phenotypes

  • Daniel AblerEmail author
  • Philippe Büchler
  • Russell C. Rockne
Conference paper
  • 108 Downloads
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11826)

Abstract

Gliomas are the most common malignant brain tumors in adults, with Glioblastoma (GBM) being the most agressive subtype. GBM is clinically evaluated with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and presents with different growth phenotypes, involving varying degrees of healthy tissue invasion and tumor induced herniation, also known as mass effect. GBM growth in the brain is frequently modeled as a reaction-diffusion process in which varying ratios of diffusion and proliferation coefficients mimic the observed spectrum of growth phenotypes ranging from nodal to diffuse. However, reaction-diffusion models alone are insufficient to explain tumor-induced mass effect on normal peripheral tissues, which is a critical clinical issue.

We propose an analysis method and framework for estimating GBM growth properties (proliferation, invasiveness, displacive potential) from MRI data routinely collected in the clinical management of GBM. This framework accounts for the mass-effect of the growing tumor by assuming a coupling between local tumor-cell density and volumetric expansion of the tissue.

We evaluate the reconstruction workflow on synthetic data that represents a range of realistic growth situations and levels of uncertainty. For most parameter combinations (90%) that correspond to tumors detectable by T1-weighted MRI, target parameters are recovered with a relative error of less than 15%.

Keywords

Mechanically-coupled tumor growth Inverse problem Image-based modeling 

Notes

Acknowledgement

The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement No. 753878.

References

  1. 1.
    Abler, D., Büchler, P.: Evaluation of a mechanically coupled reaction–diffusion model for macroscopic brain tumor growth. In: Gefen, A., Weihs, D. (eds.) Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering. LNB, pp. 57–64. Springer, Cham (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59764-5_7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Alnæs, M., et al.: The FEniCS Project Version 1.5. Archive of Numerical Software, vol. 3 (2015). https://doi.org/10.11588/ans.2015.100.20553
  3. 3.
    Clatz, O., et al.: Realistic simulation of the 3-D growth of brain tumors in MR images coupling diffusion with biomechanical deformation. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 24(10), 1334–1346 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2005.857217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hogea, C., Davatzikos, C., Biros, G.: An image-driven parameter estimation problem for a reaction-diffusion glioma growth model with mass effects. J. Math. Biol. 56(6), 793–825 (2008).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00285-007-0139-xMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hormuth, D.A., Eldridge, S.L., Weis, J.A., Miga, M.I., Yankeelov, T.E.: Mechanically coupled reaction-diffusion model to predict glioma growth: methodological details. In: von Stechow, L. (ed.) Cancer Systems Biology. MMB, vol. 1711, pp. 225–241. Springer, New York (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-7493-1_11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jain, R.K., Martin, J.D., Stylianopoulos, T.: The role of mechanical forces in tumor growth and therapy. Ann. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 16(1), 321–346 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-bioeng-071813-105259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mohamed, A., Davatzikos, C.: Finite element modeling of brain tumor mass-effect from 3D medical images. In: Duncan, J.S., Gerig, G. (eds.) MICCAI 2005. LNCS, vol. 3749, pp. 400–408. Springer, Heidelberg (2005).  https://doi.org/10.1007/11566465_50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rohlfing, T., Zahr, N.M., Sullivan, E.V., Pfefferbaum, A.: The SRI24 multichannel atlas of normal adult human brain structure. Human Brain Mapping 31(5), 798–819 (2010).  https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.20906CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Scheufele, K., Mang, A., Gholami, A., Davatzikos, C., Biros, G., Mehl, M.: Coupling brain-tumor biophysical models and diffeomorphic image registration. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 347, 533–567 (2019)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Seano, G., et al.: Solid stress in brain tumours causes neuronal loss and neurological dysfunction and can be reversed by lithium. Nature Biomed. Eng., January 2019. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41551-018-0334-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Steed, T.C., et al.: Quantification of glioblastoma mass effect by lateral ventricle displacement. Sci. Rep. 8(1), December 2018.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-21147-w
  12. 12.
    Subramanian, S., Gholami, A., Biros, G.: Simulation of glioblastoma growth using a 3d multispecies tumor model with mass effect. J. Math. Biol. 79(3), 941–967 (2019).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00285-019-01383-yMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Swanson, K.R., Alvord, E.C., Murray, J.D.: A quantitative model for differential motility of gliomas in grey and white matter. Cell Prolif. 33(5), 317–329 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Swanson, K.R., Rostomily, R.C., Alvord, E.C.: A mathematical modelling tool for predicting survival of individual patients following resection of glioblastoma: a proof of principle. Br. J. Cancer 98(1), 113–119 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.City of HopeDuarteUSA
  2. 2.University of BernBernSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations