Skip to main content

Chapter VIII: Orderings and Comparisons

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Risk and Insurance

Part of the book series: Probability Theory and Stochastic Modelling ((PTSM,volume 96))

  • 2032 Accesses

Abstract

We consider orderings between one-dimensional r.v.s X, Y  (risks). An obvious example is a.s. ordering, X ≤a.s.Y . We shall, however, mainly be concerned with orderings which only involve the distributions, i.e., which are law invariant.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 19.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    To clarify the relevance of this construction, note that the first two ways I), II) to define an ordering only involve the distributions of X, Y , and that X, Y  could in principle be defined on different probability spaces \((\varOmega _X,{\mathscr {F}}_X,{\mathbb P}_X)\), \((\varOmega _Y,{\mathscr {F}}_Y,{\mathbb P}_Y)\). Even if X, Y  were defined on a common probability space \((\varOmega ,{\mathscr {F}},{\mathbb P})\), the desired coupling property would not necessarily hold, cf. Exercise 1.1.

  2. 2.

    In the definition of \({\mathcal C}_{\mathrm {incr}}\) and similar classes in the following, it is tacitly understood that the domain is some subset of \({\mathbb R}\) containing both the support of X and the support of Y . Also, it is implicit that \({\mathbb E} f(X)\le {\mathbb E} f(Y)\) is only required for functions \(f\in {\mathcal C}_{\mathrm {incr}}\) such that the expectations are well defined.

  3. 3.

    The second condition can be restated that the stop-loss-transform of − X is dominated by the stop-loss-transform of − Y  (replace b by − b).

References

  1. H. Albrecher, J. Beirlant, J.L. Teugels, Reinsurance: Actuarial and Statistical Aspects (Wiley, 2017)

    Google Scholar 

  2. M.L. Centeno, M. Guerra, The optimal reinsurance strategy — the individual claim case. Insurance Math. Econom. 46, 450–460 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. M. Denuit, J. Dhaene, M. Goovaerts, R. Kaas, Actuarial Theory for Dependent Risks (Wiley, 2005)

    Google Scholar 

  4. M. Hald, H. Schmidli, On the maximization of the adjustment coefficient under proportional reinsurance. Astin Bulletin 14, 75–83 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. R. Kaas, M. Goovaerts, J. Dhaene, M. Denuit, Modern Actuarial Risk Theory, 2nd edn. (Springer, 2008)

    Google Scholar 

  6. A. Müller, L. Rüschendorf, On the optimal stopping values induced by general dependence structures. J. Appl. Probab. 38, 672–684 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. A. Müller, D. Stoyan, Comparison Methods for Stochastic Models and Risks (Wiley, 2002)

    Google Scholar 

  8. M. Shaked, G. Shantikumar, Stochastic Orders (Springer, 2007)

    Google Scholar 

  9. V. Strassen, The existence of probability measures with given marginals. Ann. Math. Stat. 36, 423–439 (1965)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Asmussen, S., Steffensen, M. (2020). Chapter VIII: Orderings and Comparisons. In: Risk and Insurance. Probability Theory and Stochastic Modelling, vol 96. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35176-2_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics