Advertisement

The Five ‘Troubling’ Developments in Criminology

  • Darren PalmerEmail author
Chapter
  • 5 Downloads

Abstract

This chapter explores Garland’s five ‘troubling’ developments in criminology with particular emphasis on the expansion of criminology programs. Garland (2011) suggest that as criminology increasingly becomes a stand-alone ‘discipline’ (he rejects the claims of criminology as a discipline), it is increasingly separated from other disciplines and oriented towards vocational training and practical governmental objectives (both in terms of research and training). He sees particularly strong evidence of this emanating from the US. But to what extent is this true of other countries such as Australia? The first section introduces some selected literature on the development of criminology and scholarship on learning and teaching in criminology (SCOLATIC) and the efforts of the discipline to create learning and teaching ‘standards’. Following this, the chapter addresses Garlands concern about the directions of the institutional development of criminology.

References

  1. ACJS (Academy of Criminal Justice Sciences). (n.d.). Certification for College/University Criminal Justice Baccalaureate Degree Programs. Minimum Standards for Criminal Justice Educations. Retrieved from http://www.ajcs.org/pubs/167_667_12921.cfm.
  2. Bartels, L., McGovern, A., & Richards, K. (2015). Degress of Difference? A Preliminary Study of Criminology Degrees at Australian Universities. The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 48, 119–146.Google Scholar
  3. Boshier, R., & Huang, Y. (2008). In the House of Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL), Teaching Lives Upstairs and Learning in the Basement. Teaching in Higher Education, 13(6), 645–656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bosworth, M., & Hoyle, C. (Eds.). (2011). What is Criminology? Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Boyer, E. (1990). Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities of the Professoriate. Princeton, NJ: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.Google Scholar
  6. Boyer Commission on Educating Undergraduates in the Research University. (1998). Reinventing Undergraduate Education: A Blueprint for America’s Research Universities. Stony Brook, NY: State University of New York.Google Scholar
  7. BSC. (2006). Criminology Benchmarks. Revised into Quality Assurance Agency Criminology Benchmarks (2007). Retrieved from https://core.ac.uk/reader/4157430.
  8. Bull, D. (1991, July 4–5). Proceedings of the 1991 Conference of the Australasian Association of Criminal Justice Educators. Mitchell Campus, Bathurst: Charles Sturt University.Google Scholar
  9. Carson, K., & O’Malley, P. (1989). The Institutional Foundations of Contemporary Australian Criminology. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Sociology, 25(3), 333–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Commonwealth of Australia. (2015). Higher Education Standards Framework (Threshold Standards). Canberra: Australian Government.Google Scholar
  11. Criminology. (2014). Subject Statement Benchmark: Criminology, Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education. Retrieved from https://www.qaa.ac.uk/docs/qaa/subject-benchmark-statements/sbs-criminology-14%2D%2Dmasters.pdf?sfvrsn=7790f681_16.
  12. Deckert, A., & Sarre, R. (Eds.). (2017). The Palgrave Handbook of Australian and New Zealand Criminology, Crime and Justice. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  13. Evans, C., Muijis, D., & Tomlinson, M. (2015). Engaged Student Learning: High-Impact Strategies to Enhance Student Achievements. York: Higher Education Academy.Google Scholar
  14. Finnane, M. (1998). Sir John Barry and the Melbourne Department of Criminology: Some Other Foundations of Australian Criminology. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 31(1), 69–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Finnane, M. (2006). The ABC of Criminology: Anita Muhl, JV Barry, Norval Morris and the Making of a Discipline in Australia. British Journal of Criminology, 46(3), 399–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Finnane, M. (2008). “Promoting the Theory and Practice of Criminology”: The Australian and New Zealand Society of Criminology and Its Founding Moment. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 41(2), XXXX1–XXX28. Online.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Finnane, M. (2012). The Origins of Criminology in Australia. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 45(2), 157–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fischer, R., Golden, K., & Heininger, B. (1985). Issues in Higher Education for Law Enforcement Officers: An Illinois Study. Journal of Criminal Justice, 13(4), 329–338.Google Scholar
  19. Garland, D. (2011). Criminology’s Place in the Academic Field. In M. Bosworth & C. Hoyle (Eds.), What Is Criminology? (pp. 298–377). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Giever, D. (2007). Security Education – Past, Present and the Future. Security Journal, 20, 25–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Goffman, E. (1959). The Presentation of Self In Everyday Life. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  22. Hawkins, G. J., & Chappell, D. (1967). The Need for Criminology in Australia. The Australian Law Journal, 40, 307–314.Google Scholar
  23. Lewis, C. (1992). Transitions in Police Education. Queensland Police Union Journal, 9, 19–25.Google Scholar
  24. Loader, I., & Sparks, R. (2011). Public Criminology? London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  25. Lusher, Mr. Justice. (1982). Report of the Commission to Inquire into New South Wales Police Administration. Sydney: Government Printer.Google Scholar
  26. Macfarlane, B., & Tomlinson, M. (2017). Critiques of Student Engagement. Higher Education Policy, 30, 5–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mahony, D., & Prenzler, T. (1996). Police Studies, the University, and the Police Service: An Australian Study. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 7(2), 283–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Malcolm Tight. (2018). Tracking the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning. Policy Reviews in Higher Education, 2(1), 61–78.  https://doi.org/10.1080/23322969.2017.1390690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Marenin, O., & Worrall, J. (1998). Criminal Justice: Portrait of a Discipline in Process. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 26(6), 465–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Neesham, T. A. (1985). Committee of Inquiry, Victoria Police Force, Final Report, Volume One, Melbourne, Ministry of Police and Emergency Services.Google Scholar
  31. Palmer, D. (2017). Criminology in Australia: Past, Present and Future. In D. Palmer, W. De Lint, & D. Dalton (Eds.), Crime and Justice: A Guide to Criminology (pp. 639–656). Pyrmont, NSW: Lawbook Co.Google Scholar
  32. Pratt, J., & Priestly, Z. (1999). The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology Thirty Years On. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 32, 315–324.Google Scholar
  33. Sorensen, J., Widmayer, A. G., & Scarpitti, F. R. (1994). Examining Criminal Justice and Criminology Paradigms: An Analysis of AJS and ASC Members. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 5(2), 149–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. St Johnston, E. (1971). A Report on the Victoria Police Following an Inspection by Colonel Sir Eric St Johnston, 1967–70. Melbourne: Government Printer.Google Scholar
  35. Wimshurst, K. (2011). Applying Threshold Concepts Theory to an Unsettled Field: An Exploratory Study in Criminal Justice Education. Studies in Higher Education, 36(3), 301–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wortley, R., & Wimshurst, K. (2000). What’s in a Name? Perceptions of Course Names for Criminal Justice Professionals. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 11(2), 267–278.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Criminology, Faculty of Arts and EducationDeakin UniversityGeelongAustralia

Personalised recommendations