Advertisement

Design of PLC Technology Courses Based on Blended Learning in Colleges and Universities

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering book series (LNICST, volume 299)

Abstract

PLC technology course is a specialized course of electronic information engineering major of our school. It contains several programming languages such as sequential function chart, logic block diagram, statement list, ladder diagram, etc. It is important in cultivating and improving students’ programming ability effect. Combining the characteristics of PLC technology course with the advantages of hybrid teaching method, this paper studies deeply from curriculum construction, instructional design to curriculum evaluation. Based on the Blended learning method, the “online” and “offline”, The combination of theory and experiment teaching model, to optimize the teaching quality of PLC technology has a positive role in promoting.

Keywords

Blended learning College teaching Teaching process design 

References

  1. 1.
    Helmer, S.M., Rogge, A.A.: Evaluation of a blended-learning training concept to train oncology physicians to advise their patients about complementary and integrative medicine (KOKON-KTO): study protocol for a prospective, multi-center, cluster-randomized trial. Trials 20(1), 90 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Abraham, A., Corchado, E.: Hybrid learning machines. Neurocomputing 72(13), 2729–2730 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Yeh, Y.C., Huang, L.Y.: Knowledge management in blended learning: effects on professional development in creativity instruction. Comput. Educ. 56(1), 146–156 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jia, J., Chen, Y.: Effects of a vocabulary acquisition and assessment system on students’ performance in a blended learning class for English subject. Comput. Educ. 58(1), 63–76 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Philipsen, B., Tondeur, J.: Improving teacher professional development for online and blended learning: a systematic meta-aggregative review. Educ. Technol. Res. Dev. (2019)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Roche, T., Harrington, M.: Recognition vocabulary knowledge as a predictor of academic performance in an English as a foreign language setting. Lang. Test. Asia 3(1), 12 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Woltering, V., Herrler, A.: Blended learning positively affects students’ satisfaction and the role of the tutor in the problem-based learning process: results of a mixed-method evaluation. Adv. Health Sci. Educ. Theory Pract. 14(5), 725 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Derntl, M., Motschnig-Pitrik, R.: The role of structure, patterns, and people in blended learning. Internet High. Educ. 8(2), 111–130 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Garrison, D.R., Kanuka, H.: Blended learning: uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. Internet High. Educ. 7(2), 95–105 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Liu, S., Fu, W.: Distribution of primary additional errors in fractal encoding method. Multimed. Tools Appl. 76(4), 5787–5802 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    So, H.J., Brush, T.A.: Student perceptions of collaborative learning, social presence and satisfaction in a blended learning environment: relationships and critical factors. Comput. Educ. 51(1), 318–336 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bonk, C.J., Graham, C.R.: The handbook of blended learning: global perspectives, local designs. Turkish Online J. Dist. Educ. 10(4), 181 (2009)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Meng, J.E., Deng, C.: Obstacle avoidance of a mobile robot using hybrid learning approach. IEEE Trans. Industr. Electron. 52(3), 898–905 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zhu, L., Bevilacqua, V.: Special issue on advanced intelligent computing methodologies and applications. Neurocomputing 188(1), 1–2 (2016)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Pan, Z., Liu, S.: A review of visual moving target tracking. Multimed. Tools Appl. 76, 16989–17018 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Liu, S., Pan, Z.: A novel fast fractal image compression method based on distance clustering in high dimensional sphere surface. Fractals Complex Geom. Patterns Scaling Nat. Soc. 25(23), 1740004 (2017)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Crawford, R.: Rethinking teaching and learning pedagogy for education in the twenty-first century: blended learning in music education. Music Educ. Res. 19(2), 1–19 (2017)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sugiyanta, L., Sukardjo, M.: Adjusted framework of m-learning in blended learning system for mathematics study field of junior high school level VII. In: IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, vol. 336, p. 012031 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Manwaring, K.C., Larsen, R., Graham, C., et al.: Investigating student engagement in blended learning settings using experience sampling and structural equation modeling. Internet High. Educ. 35, 21–33 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Luo, L., Cheng, X., Wang, S., et al.: Blended learning with moodle in medical statistics: an assessment of knowledge, attitudes and practices relating to e-learning. BMC Med. Educ. 17(1), 170 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© ICST Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Physics and Electronic InformationInner Mongolia University for NationalitiesTongliaoChina

Personalised recommendations