Advertisement

Point Pair Feature Matching: Evaluating Methods to Detect Simple Shapes

  • Markus ZieglerEmail author
  • Martin Rudorfer
  • Xaver Kroischke
  • Sebastian Krone
  • Jörg Krüger
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11754)

Abstract

A recent benchmark for 3D object detection and 6D pose estimation from RGB-D images shows the dominance of methods based on Point Pair Feature Matching (PPFM). Since its invention in 2010 several modifications have been proposed to cope with its weaknesses, which are computational complexity, sensitivity to noise, and difficulties in the detection of geometrically simple objects with planar surfaces and rotational symmetries. In this work we focus on the latter. We present a novel approach to automatically detect rotational symmetries by matching the object model to itself. Furthermore, we adapt methods for pose verification and use more discriminative features which incorporate global information into the Point Pair Feature. We also examine the effects of other, already existing extensions by testing them on our specialized dataset for geometrically primitive objects. Results show that particularly our handling of symmetries and the augmented features are able to boost recognition rates.

Keywords

Object detection Pose estimation Point Pair Features 

References

  1. 1.
    Birdal, T., Ilic, S.: Point pair features based object detection and pose estimation revisited. In: Brown, M., Kosecka, J., Theobalt, C. (eds.) 2015 International Conference on 3D Vision, 3DV 2015, pp. 527–535. IEEE, Piscataway, NJ (2015)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Choi, C., Christensen, H.I.: 3D pose estimation of daily objects using an RGB-D camera. In: 2012 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pp. 3342–3349. IEEE (2012)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Choi, C., Christensen, H.I.: RGB-D object pose estimation in unstructured environments. Robot. Auton. Syst. 75, 595–613 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Choi, C., Taguchi, Y., Tuzel, O., Liu, M.Y., Ramalingam, S.: Voting-based pose estimation for robotic assembly using a 3D sensor. In: IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2012, pp. 1724–1731. IEEE, Piscataway, NJ (2012)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Drost, B., Ilic, S.: 3D object detection and localization using multimodal point pair features. In: Second International Conference on 3D Imaging, Modeling, Processing, Visualization and Transmission (3DIMPVT), 2012, pp. 9–16. IEEE, Piscataway, NJ (2012)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Drost, B., Ulrich, M., Navab, N., Ilic, S.: Model globally, match locally: efficient and robust 3D object recognition. In: IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2010, pp. 998–1005. IEEE, Piscataway, NJ (2010)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    de Figueiredo, R.P., Moreno, P., Bernardino, A.: Efficient pose estimation of rotationally symmetric objects. Neurocomputing 150(Part A), 126–135 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hinterstoisser, S., et al.: Model based training, detection and pose estimation of texture-less 3D objects in heavily cluttered scenes. In: Lee, K.M., Matsushita, Y., Rehg, J.M., Hu, Z. (eds.) ACCV 2012. LNCS, vol. 7724, pp. 548–562. Springer, Heidelberg (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-37331-2_42 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hinterstoisser, S., Lepetit, V., Rajkumar, N., Konolige, K.: Going further with point pair features. In: Leibe, B., Matas, J., Sebe, N., Welling, M. (eds.) ECCV 2016. LNCS, vol. 9907, pp. 834–848. Springer, Cham (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46487-9_51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hodaň, T., et al.: BOP: benchmark for 6D object pose estimation. In: Ferrari, V., Hebert, M., Sminchisescu, C., Weiss, Y. (eds.) ECCV 2018. LNCS, vol. 11214, pp. 19–35. Springer, Cham (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01249-6_2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kiforenko, L., Drost, B., Tombari, F., Krüger, N., Buch, A.G.: A performance evaluation of point pair features. Comput. Vis. Image Underst. 166, 66–80 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kim, E., Medioni, G.: 3D object recognition in range images using visibility context. In: Staff, I. (ed.) 2011 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pp. 3800–3807. IEEE (2011)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Krull, A., Brachmann, E., Michel, F., Yang, M.Y., Gumhold, S., Rother, C.: Learning analysis-by-synthesis for 6D pose estimation in RGB-D images. In: 2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 954–962. IEEE, Piscataway, NJ (2015)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    MVTec Software GmbH: HALCON. https://www.mvtec.com/halcon/. Accessed 9 July 2019
  15. 15.
    Papazov, C., Burschka, D.: An efficient RANSAC for 3D object recognition in noisy and occluded scenes. In: Kimmel, R., Klette, R., Sugimoto, A. (eds.) ACCV 2010. LNCS, vol. 6492, pp. 135–148. Springer, Heidelberg (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19315-6_11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rudorfer, M., Kroischke, X.: Evaluation of point pair feature matching for object recognition and pose estimation in 3D scenes. In: 19 Anwendungsbezogener Workshop zur Erfassung, Modellierung, Verarbeitung und Auswertung von 3D-Daten, pp. 27–36. Gesellschaft zur Förderung angewandter Informatik e.V. (2016)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tuzel, O., Liu, M.-Y., Taguchi, Y., Raghunathan, A.: Learning to rank 3D features. In: Fleet, D., Pajdla, T., Schiele, B., Tuytelaars, T. (eds.) ECCV 2014. LNCS, vol. 8689, pp. 520–535. Springer, Cham (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10590-1_34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Vidal, J., Lin, C.Y., Llado, X., Martí, R.: A method for 6D pose estimation of free-form rigid objects using point pair features on range data. Sensors 18, 2678 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Vidal, J., Lin, C.Y., Martí, R.: 6D pose estimation using an improved method based on point pair features. CoRR abs/1802.08516 (2018)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Markus Ziegler
    • 1
    Email author
  • Martin Rudorfer
    • 1
  • Xaver Kroischke
    • 1
  • Sebastian Krone
    • 1
  • Jörg Krüger
    • 1
  1. 1.Technische Universität BerlinBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations