A Cyber-Physical System for Monitoring the Technical Condition of Heat Networks

  • Gennady I. KorshunovEmail author
  • Alexander A. Aleksandrov
  • Artur R. Tamvilius
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems book series (LNNS, volume 95)


Issues of creating a new generation of heat pipe monitoring systems using the method of pulse reflectometry are considered. The control conductors built into the thermal insulation layer along the thermal conductor ensure the detection and localization of an ongoing or forecast accident during the thermal insulation dampening. The introduction of technological innovations in the primary basic structure has led to a reduction in equipment and an increase in system reliability. New hardware and software tools have created the conditions for in-depth analysis of the technical condition of heating networks and solving new control tasks. The proposed approach and its development correspond to the concept of cyber-physical systems. The physical process of wetting insulation is an indirect but significant accident factor. Control of wetting in the prescribed tolerances fixes a sign of an accident when going beyond the tolerance field. However, the value of the parameters of a pulse reflected from the place of moistening, the dynamics of its changes contain important additional information for a possible forecast of the technical condition and energy efficiency of pipelines and heat networks in general. The formation, transmission, processing of information from many objects of heat networks using knowledge bases, the Internet of Things and other elements of the Industry 4.0 concept ensures the generation of near-optimal solutions and the achievement of high energy efficiency.


Heat networks Pulse reflectometry Technological innovations Energy efficiency Estimation criterion 


  1. 1.
    European monitoring systems.
  2. 2.
    Moller, K., Korshunov, G.: Development and adaptation to the Russian conditions of the technology of monitoring of heat networks with polyurethane insulation based on stationary reflectometers. In: Proceedings of the IEHS 2007, pp. 253–259. SUAI, St. Petersburg (2007). (in Russian)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Korshunov, G., et al.: Fuzzy models and system technical condition estimation criteria. In: Proceedings of ICICT 2019 – Fourth Conference in the Series International Congress on Information and Communication Technology, 25–26 February 2019. Brunel University, London (2019)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Korshunov, G., Smirnov, V., Milova, V.: Multi-criteria fuzzy model for system technical condition estimation at the life cycle stages. In: International Workshop “Advanced Technologies in Material Science, Mechanical and Automation Engineering” (MIP: Engineering-2019), Krasnoyarsk, Russia, 4–6 April 2019, Within the Framework of XXIV International Scientific and Research Open Conference “Modern Informatization Problems”, Yelm, WA, USA, p. 131 (2019)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Milova, V., Milova, N.: The approaches to the formalizing of the uncertainty for the fuzzy defined objects and systems description and researching. J. Voprosy radioelektroniki 7 (2013). (in Russian)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gennady I. Korshunov
    • 1
    Email author
  • Alexander A. Aleksandrov
    • 2
  • Artur R. Tamvilius
    • 3
  1. 1.Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic UniversitySt. PetersburgRussia
  2. 2.Russian Monitoring Systems LLCSt. PetersburgRussia
  3. 3.Teploelektroproekt St. Petersburg LLCSt. PetersburgRussia

Personalised recommendations