Advertisement

A Voice for Education: A Digital Analysis of Sheikha Moza’s Public Statements, 2009–2018

  • Dina Sawaly
  • Wajdi ZaghouaniEmail author
  • David Kaufer
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11864)

Abstract

Women in politics have been subject to extensive research, and their speeches examined from different gender and discourse analysis perspectives; however, little has been written on female political participation in the Arab world. This paper examines how Sheikha Moza’s public statements have evolved from 2009 to 2018 in terms of linguistic features and content. The method used is both qualitative and quantitative. Unlike previous digital studies to date, this research employs two different digital tools: DocuScope and AntConc. DocuScope was used to trace statistically significant changes and to identify the variables that have changed over time. To complement these results, AntConc was employed in order to analyze unique word choices. Results suggest that there were significant differences between Sheikha Moza’s public statements over the period in question, specifically between the years 2009 and 2018. These were examined and compared here as being predominantly “ceremonial” vs. “realistic”. Thus, in 2009 she adopted a more ceremonial, positive, academic and institutional-idealist stance on education. In comparison, in 2018, she focuses on major international tribulations; her statements contain more narrative, character, negative and descriptive clusters as per DocuScope’s analysis. In particular, in her statements, she makes striking references to human suffering and comes to an understanding that education depends on cultural, political, and economic tranquility. Her language in 2018 becomes much idealist-nationalist and much more realist about the savagery that conflict and war can exact on educational opportunity.

Keywords

DocuScope Education Language Qatar Speech Sheikha Moza Bint Nasser Al-Missned 

References

  1. Al-Rawi, M.: Using AntConc: a corpus-based tool, to investigate and analyse the keywords in Dickens’ novel ‘A Tale of Two Cities’. Int. J. Adv. Res. 5(2), 366–372 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.21474/ijar01/3158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Clark, R.P.: Why it worked: a rhetorical analysis of Obama’s speech on race (2017). Retrieved from https://www.poynter.org/reporting-editing/2017/why-it-worked-a-rhetorical-analysis-of-obamas-speech-on-race-2/
  3. Donald, K., Morris, D., James, H., Vaughan, P.: Fast pattern matching in strings. SIAM J. Comput. 6(2), 323–350 (1977).  https://doi.org/10.1137/0206024MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. Kachigan, S.K.: Statistical Analysis: an Interdisciplinary Introduction to Univariate & Multivariate Methods. Radius Press, Santa Fe (1986)Google Scholar
  5. Kulo, L.: Linguistic features in political speeches: how language can be used to impose certain moral or ethical values on people (Dissertation) (2009). Retrieved from http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-55589
  6. Kaufer, D.S., Ishizaki, S., Butler, B.S., Collins, J.: The Power of Words: Unveiling the Speaker and Writer’s Hidden Craft. Routledge, New York (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Pessoa, S., Miller, R.T., Kaufer, D.: Students’ challenges and development in the transition to academic writing at an English-medium university in Qatar. Int. Rev. Appl. Linguist. Lang. Teach. 52(2), 127–156 (2014)Google Scholar
  8. Rajakumar, M.: Assessing the Rhetoric of Sheikha Moza. Glob. Women Leaders Stud. Feminist Political Rhetoric 127–137 (2014)Google Scholar
  9. Sunderland, J.: Gendered Discourses. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ishizaki, S., Kaufer, D.: Computer-aided rhetorical analysis. In: McCarthy, P., Boonthum, C. (eds.) Applied Natural Language Processing and Content Analysis: Identification, Investigation, and Resolution, pp. 276–296 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Van Dijk, T.A.: 18 critical discourse analysis. In: Schiffrin, D., Hamilton, H., Tannen, D. (eds.) The Handbook of Discourse Analysis, pp. 349–371. Blackwell Publishing, Malden (2001)Google Scholar
  12. Wang, J.: A critical discourse analysis of Barack Obama’s speeches. J. Lang. Teach. Res. 1(3), 254–261 (2010).  https://doi.org/10.4304/jltr.1.3.254-261CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Hamad Bin Khalifa UniversityDohaQatar
  2. 2.Carnegie Mellon UniversityPittsburghUSA

Personalised recommendations