Advertisement

Using Simulated Reproductive History Data to Re-think the Relationship Between Education and Fertility

  • Daniel CigandaEmail author
  • Angelo Lorenti
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11864)

Abstract

The weakening negative educational gradient of fertility is usually interpreted as the expression of changes in the way education shapes reproductive decisions across cohorts. We argue, however, that the reversal of the statistical association does not imply a reversal in the underlying mechanisms that connect education and fertility. Instead, we believe the reversal in the statistical association emerges as a result of the convergence of the life-course of individuals with different educational attainment levels across two dimensions: the ability to control the reproductive process and the desire for a given family size. In order to show this we reproduce the results reported in previous studies by using simulated reproductive trajectories, generated from a model that assumes no change in the way education shapes reproductive intentions over time. Beyond our substantive focus, we intend to show how our understanding of key demographic processes could change if we were able to incorporate in our modeling difficult or impossible to observe quantities.

Keywords

Computational modelling Education Fertility 

References

  1. 1.
    Becker, G.S.: An economic analysis of fertility. In: Demographic and Economic Change in Developed Countries, pp. 209–240. Columbia University Press (1960)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Becker, G.S., Lewis, H.G.: On the interaction between the quantity and quality of children. J. Polit. Econ. 81(2, Part 2), S279–S288 (1973)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Becker, G.S., Tomes, N.: Child endowments and the quantity and quality of children. J. Polit. Econ. 84(4, Part 2), S143–S162 (1976)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bongaarts, J.: The measurement of wanted fertility. Population Dev. Rev. 16, 487–506 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bongaarts, J.: Trends in unwanted childbearing in the developing world. Stud. Fam. Planning 28, 267–277 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bongaarts, J.: Fertility and reproductive preferences in post-transitional societies. Population Dev. Rev. 27, 260–281 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bulatao, R.A., Lee, R.D., Hollerbach, P., Bongaarts, J.: Determinants of fertility in developing countries (1983)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Caltabiano, M., Castiglioni, M., Rosina, A., et al.: Lowest-low fertility: signs of a recovery in Italy. Demographic Res. 21(23), 681–718 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Castiglioni, M., Dalla Zuanna, G., Loghi, M.: Planned and unplanned births and conceptions in Italy, 1970–1995. Euro. J. Population/Rev. Européenne de Démographie 17(3), 207–233 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ciganda, D., Todd, N.: Micro-level dynamics behind the recuperation of fertility at higher development levels. Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research Working Paper (2019)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ciganda, D., Villavicencio, F.: Feedback mechanisms in the postponement of fertility in Spain. In: Grow, A., Van Bavel, J. (eds.) Agent-Based Modelling in Population Studies. TSSDMPA, vol. 41, pp. 405–435. Springer, Cham (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32283-4_14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cleland, J.: Marital fertility decline in developing countries: theories and the evidence (1985)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cochrane, S.H.: Fertility and education: what do we really know? (1979)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cochrane, S.H.: Effects of education and urbanization on fertility (1983)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    De Wachter, D., Neels, K.: Educational differentials in fertility intentions and outcomes: family formation in flanders in the early 1990s. Vienna Yearb. Population Res. 9, 227–258 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Doepke, M.: Gary becker on the quantity and quality of children. J. Demographic Econ. 81(1), 59–66 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Easterlin, R.A., Crimmins, E.M.: The Fertility Revolution: A Supply-Demand Analysis. University of Chicago Press (1985)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Esping-Andersen, G.: Incomplete Revolution: Adapting Welfare States to Women’s New Roles. Polity, Cambridge (2009)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Grow, A., Schnor, C., Van Bavel, J.: The reversal of the gender gap in education and relative divorce risks: a matter of alternatives in partner choice? Population Stud. 71(Suppl. 1), 15–34 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Grow, A., Van Bavel, J.: Assortative mating and the reversal of gender inequality in education in Europe: an agent-based model. PloS One 10(6), e0127806 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Henshaw, S.K.: Unintended pregnancy in the united states. Fam. Plann. Perspect. 30, 24–46 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hoem, B., Hoem, J.M.: The impact of women’s employment on second and third births in modern sweden. Population Stud. 43(1), 47–67 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Klijzing, E.: Are there unmet family planning needs in Europe? Fam. Plann. Perspect. 32, 74–88 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kohler, H.P.: Fertility and Social Interaction: An Economic Perspective. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kohler, H.P., Billari, F.C., Ortega, J.A.: The emergence of lowest-low fertility in Europe during the 1990s. Population Dev. Rev. 28(4), 641–680 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kravdal, Ø.: The emergence of a positive relation between education and third birth rates in Norway with supportive evidence from the united states. Population Stud. 46(3), 459–475 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kravdal, Ø.: The high fertility of college educated women in Norway: an artefact of the separate modelling of each parity transition. Demographic Res. 5, 187–216 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kravdal, Ø., Rindfuss, R.R.: Changing relationships between education and fertility: a study of women and men born 1940 to 1964. Am. Sociol. Rev. 73(5), 854–873 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kreyenfeld, M.: Time-squeeze, partner effect or self-selection? An investigation into the positive effect of women’s education on second birth risks in west Germany. Demographic Res. 7, 15–48 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Luci-Greulich, A., Thévenon, O.: Does economic advancement ‘Cause’a re-increase in fertility? An empirical analysis for OECD countries (1960–2007). Eur. J. Population 30(2), 187–221 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Mencarini, L., Tanturri, M.L.: Time use, family role-set and childbearing among Italian working women. Genus 60, 111–137 (2004)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Mills, M., Mencarini, L., Tanturri, M.L., Begall, K.: Gender equity and fertility intentions in Italy and The Netherlands. Demographic Res. 18, 1–26 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Minnesota Population Center: Integrated public use microdata series, international: Version 7.0 (2018)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Montgomery, M.R., Casterline, J.B.: The diffusion of fertility control in Taiwan: evidence from pooled cross-section time-series models. Population Stud. 47(3), 457–479 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Murphy, M.: The contraceptive pill and women’s employment as factors in fertility change in britain 1963–1980: a challenge to the conventional view. Population Stud. 47(2), 221–243 (1993)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Myrskylä, M., Kohler, H.P., Billari, F.C.: Advances in development reverse fertility declines. Nature 460(7256), 741–743 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Notestein, F.W.: Economic Problems of Population Change. Oxford University Press, London (1953)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Carreras de Odriozola, A., Tafunell Sambola, X.: Estadísticas históricas de España, siglos XIX-XX. Fundacion BBVA/BBVA Foundation (2006)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    R Core Team: R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria (2015). http://www.r-project.org
  40. 40.
    Régnier-Loilier, A., Leridon, H., Cahen, F., et al.: Four decades of legalized contraception in France: an unfinished revolution? Technical report, Institut National d’Études Démographiques (INED) (2007)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Rindfuss, R.R., Bumpass, L., John, C.: Education and fertility: implications for the roles women occupy. Am. Sociol. Rev. 45(3), 431–447 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Rosero-Bixby, L., Casterline, J.B.: Modelling diffusion effects in fertility transition. Population Stud. 47(1), 147–167 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Sullivan, O., Billari, F.C., Altintas, E.: Fathers’ changing contributions to child care and domestic work in very low-fertility countries: the effect of education. J. Fam. Issues 35(8), 1048–1065 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Testa, M.R.: On the positive correlation between education and fertility intentions in Europe: individual-and country-level evidence. Adv. Life Course Res. 21, 28–42 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Villa, P.: Séries macro-économiques historiques: méthodologie et analyse économique. Institut National de la Statistique et des Etudes Economiques (1997)Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Willekens, F.: Continuous-time microsimulation in longitudinal analysis. In: New frontiers in microsimulation modelling, pp. 353–376 (2009)Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Wulf, D.: Low fertility in Europe: a report from the 1981 IUSSP meeting. Fam. Plann. Perspect. 14(5), 264–270 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Max Planck Institute for Demographic ResearchRostockGermany

Personalised recommendations