Contaminations, Ethnographic Fictions and What-What

On the Convergence of Literary and Academic Writing
  • Oscar HemerEmail author
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Literary Anthropology book series (PSLA)


The texts that constitute this book intend to explore the possible merging of academic and literary practices. The aim is not experimentation for its own sake, but the search for a form—forms—that is/are congenial with the subject of interrogation: the world in transition, with South Africa as the main focal point.


  1. Appiah, K. A. (2006). Cosmopolitanism: Ethics in a World of Strangers. New York and London: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
  2. Clifford, J. (1986). “Introduction: Partial Truths”, in Clifford, J. & G. E. Marcus (eds.). Writing Culture: The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  3. Douglas, M. (1966). Purity and Danger: An Analysis of Concepts of Pollution and Taboo. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  4. Duschinsky, R. (2013). “The Politics of Purity: When, Actually, Is Dirt Out of Place?” Thesis Eleven 119 (1): 63–77. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Eriksen, T. H. (1994). “The Author as Anthropologist: Some West Indian Lessons About the Relevance of Fiction for Anthropology”, in Archetti, E. P. (ed.). Exploring the Written: Anthropology and the Multiplicity of Writing. Oslo: Scandinavian University Press (Universitetsforlaget).Google Scholar
  6. Glissant, É. (1997 [1990]). Poetics of Relation. Transl. by B. Wing. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press [Poétique de la Relation. Poétique III. Paris: Gallimard].Google Scholar
  7. Hemer, O. (2011). Writing Transition: Fiction and Truth in South Africa and Argentina. Diss. Oslo: University of Oslo.Google Scholar
  8. Hemer, O. (2012). Fiction and Truth in Transition: Writing the Present Past in South Africa and Argentina. Berlin: Lit Verlag.Google Scholar
  9. Hemer, O. (2014). Argentinatrilogin (e-book). Stockholm: Vulkan.Google Scholar
  10. Hemer, O. (2015). “Bengaluru Boogie: Outlines for an Ethnographic Fiction”, in Hansen, A. H., Hemer, O. & T. Tufte (eds.). Memory on Trial: Media, Citizenship and Social Justice. Berlin: Lit Verlag.Google Scholar
  11. Kraus, C. (2016 [1997]). I Love Dick. London: Serpent’s Tail.Google Scholar
  12. Robertson, R. (1992). Globalization: Social Theory and Global Culture. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  13. Rushdie, S. (1992). Imaginary Homelands: Essays and Criticism 1981–1991. London: Granta in association with Penguin.Google Scholar
  14. Saer, J. J. (1997). El concepto de ficción. Buenos Aires: Seix Barral.Google Scholar
  15. Söderblom, S. (2009). “Anteckningar om senfärdigheten – om ansatser till konstnärlig forskning inom det litterära området”, in Lind, T. (ed.). Konst och forskningspolitik: konstnärlig forskning inför framtiden. Stockholm: Vetenskapsrådet.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Arts and Communication, K3Malmö UniversityMalmöSweden

Personalised recommendations