Advertisement

Prostate Cancer Classification Based on Best First Search and Taguchi Feature Selection Method

  • Md Akizur Rahman
  • Priyanka Singh
  • Ravie Chandren Muniyandi
  • Domingo Mery
  • Mukesh PrasadEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11854)

Abstract

Prostate cancer is the second most common cancer occurring in men worldwide, about 1 in 41 men will die because of prostate cancer. Death rates of prostate cancer increases with age. Even though, it being a serious condition only about 1 man in 9 will be diagnosed with prostate cancer during his lifetime. Accurate and early diagnosis can help clinician to treat the cancer better and save lives. This paper proposes two phases feature selection method to enhance prostate cancer early diagnosis based on artificial neural network. In the first phase, Best First Search method is used to extract the relevant features from original dataset. In the second phase, Taguchi method is used to select the most important feature from the already extracted features from Best First Search method. A public available prostate cancer benchmark dataset is used for experiment, which contains two classes of data normal and abnormal. The proposed method outperforms other existing methods on prostate cancer benchmark dataset with classification accuracy of 98.6%. The proposed approach can help clinicians to reach at more accurate and early diagnosis of different stages of prostate cancer and so that they make most suitable treatment decision to save lives of patients and prevent death due to prostate cancer.

Keywords

Prostate cancer Artificial neural network Feature selection Best First Search method Taguchi method 

References

  1. 1.
    Prostate Cancer Statistics. https://www.wcrf.org/dietandcancer/cancer-trends/prostate-cancer-statistics. Accessed 14 Jul 2019
  2. 2.
  3. 3.
    Ham, F.M., Kostanic, I.: Principles of Neurocomputing for Science and Engineering. McGraw Hill, New York (2001)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chen, L.: Pattern classification by assembling small neural networks. In: Proceedings of 2005 IEEE International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, vol. 3, pp. 1947–1952 (2005)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ibraheem, A.K.: An Application of Artificial Neural Network Classifier for Medical Diagnosis (2013)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rahman, M.A., Muniyandi, R.C.: Feature selection from colon cancer dataset for cancer classification using artificial neural network. Int. J. Adv. Sci. Eng. Inf. Technol. 8(4–2), 1387 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Aziz, R., Verma, C.K., Srivastava, N.: A fuzzy based feature selection from independent component subspace for machine learning classification of microarray data. Genomics Data 8, 4–15 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Elyasigomari, V., Mirjafari, M.S., Screen, H.R.C., Shaheed, M.H.: Cancer classification using a novel gene selection approach by means of shuffling based on data clustering with optimization. Appl. Soft Comput. 35, 43–51 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chen, H., Zhang, Y., Gutman, I.: A kernel-based clustering method for gene selection with gene expression data. J. Biomed. Inform. 62, 12–20 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nguyen, T., Khosravi, A., Creighton, D., Nahavandi, S.: Hidden markov models for cancer classification using gene expression profiles. Inf. Sci. 316, 293–307 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gao, L., Ye, M., Lu, X., Huang, D.: Hybrid method based on information gain and support vector machine for gene selection in cancer classification. Genomics Proteomics Bioinform. 15(6), 389–395 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dashtban, M., Balafar, M.: Gene selection for microarray cancer classification using a new evolutionary method employing artificial intelligence concepts. Genomics 109(2), 91–107 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ludwig, S.A., Picek, S., Jakobovic, D.: Classification of cancer data: analyzing gene expression data using a fuzzy decision tree algorithm. In: Kahraman, C., Topcu, Y. (eds.) Operations Research Applications in Health Care Management. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, vol. 262, pp. 327–347 (2018). Springer, Cham  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65455-3_13Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Dashtban, M., Balafar, M., Suravajhala, P.: Gene selection for tumor classification using a novel bio-inspired multi-objective approach. Genomics 110(1), 10–17 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    gems-system.org. http://gems-system.org/. Accessed 21 May 2017
  16. 16.
    Wu, Y., Wu, A.: Taguchi Methods for Robust Design. ASME Press (2000)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Md Akizur Rahman
    • 1
  • Priyanka Singh
    • 2
  • Ravie Chandren Muniyandi
    • 1
  • Domingo Mery
    • 3
  • Mukesh Prasad
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.Research Center for Cyber Security, Faculty of Information Science and TechnologyUniversiti Kebangsaan MalaysiaBangiMalaysia
  2. 2.School of Computer Science, FEITUniversity of Technology SydneyUltimo, SydneyAustralia
  3. 3.Department of Computer ScienceUniversity of ChileSantiagoChile

Personalised recommendations