Neuronal Dendritic Fiber Interference Due to Signal Propagation

  • Satyabrat Malla Bujar BaruahEmail author
  • Plabita Gogoi
  • Soumik Roy
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11942)


In the proposed model, the mathematical modeling of a pair of dendritic fibers using the famous cable equation has been carried out to simulate the effects of signal interference. The response of one fiber due to propagating signal in another fiber has been simulated using the modeled equations which show some interesting results. The simulation shows that the baseline wandering in propagating signal as one of the probable reason for interfiber signal interference. The results also show low-frequency noise while modeling for interfiber signal interference in a pair of dendritic fibers which seems to be an effect of phase-shifted signal, propagation in nearby fiber. In similar simulation, with on phase signal propagation in the two nearby fiber, the results shows shift in the signal baseline potential accompanied by baseline wandering in the signal, which shows the baseline shift, baseline wandering and noise as probable function of interference due to propagating signal in a nearby fiber.


Neuron signal interference Neuronal signal artifacts Hodgkin and Huxley model Membrane properties Inter-fibre interference Cable equation 



This publication is an outcome of the R&D work undertaken project under the Visvesvaraya Ph.D. Scheme of Ministry of Electronics & Information Technology, Government of India, being implemented by Digital India Corporation.


  1. 1.
    Agmon-Snir, H.: A novel theoretical approach to the analysis of dendritic transients. Biophys. J. 69(5), 1633–1656 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Anastassiou, C.A., Perin, R., Markram, H., Koch, C.: Ephaptic coupling of cortical neurons. Nat. Neurosci. 14(2), 217 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Buzsáki, G., Anastassiou, C.A., Koch, C.: The origin of extracellular fields and currents—EEG, ECoG, LFP and spikes. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 13(6), 407 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cao, B.J., Abbott, L.: A new computational method for cable theory problems. Biophys. J. 64(2), 303–313 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gerstner, W., Kistler, W.M.: Spiking Neuron Models: Single Neurons, Populations, Plasticity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Goldstein, S.S., Rall, W.: Changes of action potential shape and velocity for changing core conductor geometry. Biophys. J. 14(10), 731–757 (1974)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Guo, S., Wang, C., Ma, J., Jin, W.: Transmission of blocked electric pulses in a cable neuron model by using an electric field. Neurocomputing 216, 627–637 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hasselmo, M.E., Giocomo, L.M., Zilli, E.A.: Grid cell firing may arise from interference of theta frequency membrane potential oscillations in single neurons. Hippocampus 17(12), 1252–1271 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Holt, G.R., Koch, C.: Electrical interactions via the extracellular potential near cell bodies. J. Comput. Neurosci. 6(2), 169–184 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Major, G., Evans, J.D., Jack, J.: Solutions for transients in arbitrarily branching cables: I. Voltage recording with a somatic shunt. Biophys. J. 65(1), 423 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Manwani, A., Koch, C.: Detecting and estimating signals in noisy cable structures, I: neuronal noise sources. Neural Comput. 11(8), 1797–1829 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Martinez-Banaclocha, M.: Ephaptic coupling of cortical neurons: possible contribution of astroglial magnetic fields? Neuroscience 370, 37–45 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Monai, H., Omori, T., Okada, M., Inoue, M., Miyakawa, H., Aonishi, T.: An analytic solution of the cable equation predicts frequency preference of a passive shunt-end cylindrical cable in response to extracellular oscillating electric fields. Biophys. J. 98(4), 524–533 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Onslow, A.C.E., Hasselmo, M.E., Newman, E.L.: DC-shifts in amplitude in-field generated by an oscillatory interference model of grid cell firing. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 8, 1 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rall, W.: Theory of physiological properties of dendrites. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 96(4), 1071–1092 (1962)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rall, W.: Time constants and electrotonic length of membrane cylinders and neurons. Biophys. J. 9(12), 1483–1508 (1969)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rall, W.: Core conductor theory and cable properties of neurons. Compr. Physiol. 39–97 (2011)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ramón, F., Joyner, R., Moore, J.: Propagation of action potentials in inhomogeneous axon regions. In: Moore, J.W. (ed.) Membranes, Ions, and Impulses. FASEBM, vol. 5, pp. 85–100. Springer, Boston (1975). Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rinzel, J.: Voltage transients in neuronal dendritic trees. In: Moore, J.W. (ed.) Membranes, Ions, and Impulses. FASEBM, vol. 5, pp. 71–83. Springer, Boston (1975). Scholar
  20. 20.
    Yi, G.S., Wang, J., Wei, X.L., Tsang, K.M., Chan, W.L., Deng, B.: Neuronal spike initiation modulated by extracellular electric fields. PLoS ONE 9(5), e97481 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Satyabrat Malla Bujar Baruah
    • 1
    Email author
  • Plabita Gogoi
    • 1
  • Soumik Roy
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Electronics and Communication EngineeringTezpur UniversityTezpurIndia

Personalised recommendations