Advertisement

Damage Identification Supported by Nondestructive Testing Techniques

  • Zbigniew L. KowalewskiEmail author
  • Aneta Ustrzycka
  • Tadeusz Szymczak
  • Katarzyna Makowska
  • Dominik Kukla
Chapter
Part of the Advanced Structured Materials book series (STRUCTMAT, volume 121)

Abstract

Development of damage due to exploitation loadings was investigated using destructive and non-destructive methods in materials commonly applied in power engineering or automotive industry. The fatigue or creep tests for a range of different materials were interrupted for selected number of cycles or deformation level in order to assess a damage degree. As destructive methods the standard tensile tests were carried out after prestraining. Subsequently, an evolution of the selected tensile parameters was taken into account for damage identification. The ultrasonic, magnetic and novel optical techniques were used as the non-destructive methods for damage evaluation. The experimental programme also included microscopic observations. The results show that ultrasonic and magnetic parameters can be correlated with those coming from destructive tests. It is shown that good correlation of mechanical and selected non-destructive parameters identifying damage can be achieved for the materials tested. The results of damage monitoring during fatigue tests supported by contemporary optical techniques (Digital Image Correlation and Electronic Spackle Pattern Interferometry) proved their great suitability for effective identification of places of damage initiation.

The work additionally presents simulation of fatigue crack initiation for cyclic loading within the nominal elastic regime. It is assumed that damage growth occurs due to action of mean stress and its fluctuations induced by crystalline grain inhomogeneity and free boundary effect. The fluctuation fields in polycrystalline metal subjected to the mechanical loading inducing uniform mean stress and strain states development due to the material inhomogeneity related to grain anisotropy and inhomogeneity. The yielding process develops at the low mean stress level in some grains due to the local strain accumulation at their boundaries. These stress fluctuations, developing at a fraction of the macroscopic elastic limit, are the source of initial structural defects and microscopic plastic mechanisms controlling the evolution of defect assemble toward the state of advanced yielding. A mechanism responsible for damage accumulation during cyclic loading below the yield point remains elusive and requires classification. The analytical description is aimed at development of the consistent description of the microplastic state of material. The macrocrack initiation corresponds to a critical value of accumulated damage.

Keywords

Creep Damage Fatigue Optical methods (DIC ESPI) Nondestructive investigations Magnetic and ultrasonic techniques Microplasticity Crack Modelling 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Andersson M (2013) The influence of notches on fatigue of heat treated sintered steel. In: International Powder Metallurgy Congress and Exhibition, Euro PM 2013 in Gothenburg on September 17, 2013Google Scholar
  2. Augustyniak B (2003) Magnetomechanical effects and their application in nondestructive evaluation of materials (in Polish). Gdansk University of Technology, GdańskGoogle Scholar
  3. Augustyniak B, Chmielewski M, Piotrowski L, Kowalewski Z (2008) Comparison of properties of magnetoacoustic emission and mechanical barkhausen effects for P91 steel after plastic flow and creep. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics 44(11):3273–3276,  https://doi.org/10.1109/tmag.2008.2002525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bailey RW (1935) The utilization of creep test data in engineering design. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers 131(1):131–349, https://doi.org/10.1243/pime\_proc\_1935\_131\_012\_02CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baldev R, Jayakumar T, Moorthy V, Vaidyanathan S (2001) Characterization of microstructures, deformation and fatigue damage in different steels using magnetic Barkhausen emission technique. Russian Journal of Nondestructive Testing 37(11):789–798,  https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1015847303916CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bennett JA,Weinberg JG (1954) Fatigue notch sensitivity of some aluminium alloys. Journal of Research of the National Bureau of Standards 52(5):235–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blaow A, Evans JT, Shaw BA (2007) The effect of microstructure and applied stress on magnetic Barkhausen emission in induction hardened steel. Journal of Materials Science 42(12):4364–4371,  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-006-0631-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Boronski D (2007) Methods for examination of strain and stress under fatigue of material and structures (in Polish). Report, Institute for Sustainable Technologies - National Research Institute, Bydgoszcz-RadomGoogle Scholar
  9. Brathe L (1978) Macroscopic measurements of creep damage in metals. Scandinavian Journal of Metallurgy 7(5):199–203Google Scholar
  10. Buttle DJ, Briggs GAD, Jakubovics JP, Little EA, Scruby CB, Busse G, Sayers CM, Green RE, Ash EA, Scruby CB (1986) Magnetoacoustic and Barkhausen emission in ferromagnetic materials. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences 320(1554):363–378,  https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.1986.0124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chen C (2004) General theory. ME631 15 pages, UAFGoogle Scholar
  12. Chu TC, Ranson WF, Sutton MA, Peters WH (1985) Application of digitalimage-correlation techniques to experimental mechanics. Experimental Mechanics 25(3):232–244,  https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02325092CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. DANTEC (2019) Dynamic info-materials. https://www.dantecdynamics.com/
  14. Dietrich L, Kowalewski ZL (1997) Experimental investigation of an anisotropy in copper subjected to predeformation due to constant and monotonic loadings. International Journal of Plasticity 13(1):87 – 109,  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0749-6419(97)00002-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dietrich L, Grzywna P, Kukla D (2012) The use of optical methods to locate fatigue damage (in Polish). Przegla¸d Spawalnictwa 13:15–18Google Scholar
  16. DuQuensay DL, Topper TH, Yu MT (1986) The effect of notch radius on the fatigue notch factor and the propagation of short cracks. In: Miller KJ, de los Rios ER (eds) The behaviour of short fatigue cracks, Mechanical Engineering Publications, London, pp 323–335Google Scholar
  17. Durif E, Réthoré J, Combescure A, Fregonese M, Chaudet P (2012) Controlling stress intensity factors during a fatigue crack propagation using digital image correlation and a load shedding procedure. Experimental Mechanics 52(8):1021–1031,  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-011-9552-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fatemi A, Fang D, Zeng Z (2002) Notched fatigue behaviour under axial and torsion loads: experiment and predictions. In: 8th International Fatigue Congress, Stockholm, vol 3, pp 1905–1914Google Scholar
  19. Fatemi A, Zeng Z, PlaseiedA(2004) Fatigue behavior and life predictions of notched specimens made of qt and forged microalloyed steels. International Journal of Fatigue 26(6):663 – 672,  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2003.10.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fel D, Hsu DK, Warchol M (2001) Simultaneous velocity, thickness and profile imaging by ultrasonic scan. Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation 8(3):95–112,  https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1013550921673CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Filippini M (2000) Stress gradient calculations at notches. International Journal of Fatigue 22(5):397 – 409,  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0142-1123(00)00010-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Forster J, Theobald A, Engel S, Pasmann R (2012) Using optical measuring system for identification of material parameters for finite element analysis. In: 11. LSDYNA, DYNAmore GmbH, Ulm, pp 1–9Google Scholar
  23. Frost HJ, AshbyM (1982) Deformation-mechanism Maps. The Plasticity and Creep of Metals and Ceramics. Pergamon Press, Oxford, New York, SydneyGoogle Scholar
  24. GOM (2007) ARAMIS user manual softwareGoogle Scholar
  25. Gower MR, Shaw RM (2010) Towards a planar cruciform specimen for biaxial characterisation of polymer matrix composites. In: Advances in Experimental Mechanics VII, Trans Tech Publications Ltd, Applied Mechanics and Materials, vol 24, pp 115–120,  https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.24-25.115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gungor S (2009) Moire interferometry. In: Eaton-Evans J, Dulie-Barton JM, Burguete RL (eds) Modern Stress and Strain Analysis. A State of the Art Guide to Measurement Techniques, British Society for Strain Measurement, pp 8–9Google Scholar
  27. Hayhurst D (1972) Creep rupture under multi-axial states of stress. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 20(6):381 – 382,  https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5096(72)90015-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Jiles D (1998) Introduction to Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, 2nd edn. Taylor and Francis Group, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  29. Kamaya M, Kawakubo M (2011) A procedure for determining the true stress–strain curve over a large range of strains using digital image correlation and finite element analysis. Mechanics of Materials 43(5):243 – 253,  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmat.2011.02.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kim CS, Park IK, Jhang KY (2009) Nonlinear ultrasonic characterization of thermal degradation in ferritic 2.25Cr–1Mo steel. NDT&E International 42(3):204 – 209,  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ndteint.2008.09.002, 2nd International Conference on Advanced Nondestructive EvaluationCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kopeć M, Grzywna P, Kukla D, Kowalewski Z (2012) Evaluation of the fatigue damage development using ESPI method. Inzynieria Materiałowa 4(212):1–4Google Scholar
  32. Kowalewski ZL (2005) Creep of Metals – Experiment and Modeling (in Polish). IPPT PAN, WarsawGoogle Scholar
  33. Kwan MM, Ono K, Shibata M (1984) Magnetomechanical acoustic emission of ferromagnetic materials at low magnetization levels (type I behaviour). Journal of Acoustic Emisssion 3:144–156Google Scholar
  34. Lanning DB, Haritos GK, Nicholas T (1999) Influence of stress state on high cycle fatigue of notched Ti-6Al-4V specimens. International Journal of Fatigue 21:S87 – S95,  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0142-1123(99)00059-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lord JD (2009) Digital image correlation (dic). In: Eaton-Evans J, Dulie-Barton JM, Burguete RL (eds) Modern Stress and Strain Analysis. A State of the Art Guide to Measurement Techniques, British Society for Strain Measurement, pp 14–15Google Scholar
  36. Makowska K (2014) Methodology for assessing the state of damage to materials subjected to laboratory simulated operational loads (in Polish). PhD Thesis, Instytut Podstawowych Problemów Techniki PAN, WarsawGoogle Scholar
  37. Makowska K, Kowalewski ZL (2015) Possibilities of using Barkhausen noise to assess microstructure and mechanical properties of materials (in Polish). Energetyka - Problemy energetyki i gospodarki paliwowo-energetycznej 736(10):664–667Google Scholar
  38. Makowska K, Kowalewski ZL, Augustyniak B, Piotrowski L (2014) Determination of mechanical properties of P91 steel by means of magnetic Barkhausen emission. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics 52(1):181–188Google Scholar
  39. Makowska K, Kowalewski ZL, Ziółkowski P, Badur J (2017) Assessment of damage level of turbine blades using the Barkhausen noise signal (in Polish). Energetyka-Problemy energetyki i gospodarki paliwowo-energetycznej 760(10):638–641Google Scholar
  40. Marténez-Ona R, Pérez MC (2000) Research on creep damage detection in reformer tubes by ultrasonic testing. In: Proc. 15 WCNDT Roma 2000Google Scholar
  41. Maruno Y, Miyahara H, Noguchi H, Ogi K (2003) Notch size effects in the fatigue characteristics of Al-Si-Cu-Mg cast alloy. Journal of the Japan Institute of Metals 67(7):331–335,  https://doi.org/10.2320/jinstmet1952.67.7_331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Mazdumar PK, Lawrence Jr FV (1981) An analytical study of the fatigue notch size effect. A report of the fracture control program, College of Engineering, University of Illinois, Urbana, IllinoisGoogle Scholar
  43. Milke JG, Beuth JL, Biry NE (2000) Notch strengthening in titanium alumini dies under monotonic loading. Experimental Mechanics 40(4):415–424,  https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02326488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Mitra A, Mohapatra JN, Swaminathan J, Ghosh M, Panda AK, Ghosh RN (2007) Magnetic evaluation of creep in modified 9Cr–1Mo steel. Scripta Materialia 57(9):813 – 816,  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2007.07.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Mohapatra J, Ray A, Swaminathan J, Mitra A (2008) Creep behaviour study of virgin and service exposed 5Cr–0.5Mo steel using magnetic Barkhausen emissions technique. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 320(18):2284 – 2290,  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2008.04.152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Mróz Z, Seweryn A, Tomczyk A (2005) Fatigue crack growth prediction accounting for the damage zone. Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures 28(1-2):61–71,  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2695.2004.00829.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Narayan R, Green Jr RE (1975) Ultrasonic attenuation monitoring of fatique damage in nuclear pressure vessel steel at high temperature. In: Materials Evaluation, 25-26 February 1975Google Scholar
  48. Neuber H (1961) Theory of Notch Stresses. Office of Technical Services, U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  49. Neuber H (2001) Kerbspannungslehre, 4th edn. Klassiker der Technik, Springer, Berlin, HeidelbergCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Ogi H, Minami Y, Aoki S, Hirao M (2000) Contactless monitoring of surface-wave attenuation and nonlinearity for evaluating remaining life of fatigued steel. In: Proc. 15 WCNDT Roma 2000Google Scholar
  51. Ohtani T, Ogi H, Hirao M (2006) Evolution of microstructure and acoustic damping during creep of a Cr–Mo–V ferritic steel. Acta Materialia 54(10):2705 – 2713,  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2006.02.010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Olszak W (1965) Theory of Plasticity (in Polish). PWN, WarsawGoogle Scholar
  53. O’Sullivan D, Cotterell M, Cassidy S, Tanner DA, Mészáros I (2004) Magnetoacoustic emission for the characterisation of ferritic stainless steel microstructural state. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 271(2):381 – 389,  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2003.10.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Palma ES, Júnior AA, Mansur TR, Pinto JMA (2003) Fatigue damage in AISI/SAE 8620 steel. In: Proceedings of COBEM 2003, 17th International Congress of Mechanical Engineering, 10-14 November, São Paulo, BrazilGoogle Scholar
  55. Patorski K (2005) Laser Interferometry (in Polish), Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Warszawskiej, Warsaw, pp 214–261Google Scholar
  56. Peterson RE (1959) Analytical approach to stress concentration effect in fatigue of aircraft materials. In: Proceedings on Fatigue of Aircraft Structure, no. 59-507 in WADC Technical Report, pp 273–299Google Scholar
  57. Pierron S (2009) Digital speckle pattern interferometry. In: Eaton-Evans J, Dulie-Barton JM, Burguete RL (eds) Modern Stress and Strain Analysis. A State of the Art Guide to Measurement Techniques, British Society for Strain Measurement, pp 14–15Google Scholar
  58. Pilkey WD (1997) Peterson’s Stress Concentration Factors. Wiley, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Piotrowski L, Augustyniak B, Chmielewski M, Tomáš I (2009) The influence of plastic deformation on the magnetoelastic properties of the CSN12021 grade steel. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 321(15):2331 – 2335,  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2009.02.028CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Pluvingae G (2001) Notch effects in fatigue and fracture. In: Pluvingae G, Gjonaj M (eds) Notch Effects in Fatigue and Fracture, Springer Science + Business Media, Dordrecht, NATO Science Series (Series II: Mathematics, Physics and Chemistry), vol 11, pp 1–22Google Scholar
  61. Qian G, Hong Y, Zhou C (2010) Investigation of high cycle and very-high-cycle fatigue behaviors for a structural steel with smooth and notched specimens. Engineering Failure Analysis 17(7):1517 – 1525,  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2010.06.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Sablik MJ, Augustyniak B (1999) Magnetic methods of nondestructive evaluation. In: Wiley Encyclopedia of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Wiley,  https://doi.org/10.1002/047134608x.w4552
  63. Sagar SP, Parida N, Das S, Dobmann G, Bhattacharya DK (2005) Magnetic Barkhausen emission to evaluate fatigue damage in a low carbon structural steel. International Journal of Fatigue 27(3):317 – 322,  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2004.06.015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Schneider E (1995) Ultrasonic birefringence effect — Its application for materials characterisations. Optics and Lasers in Engineering 22(4):305 – 323,  https://doi.org/10.1016/0143-8166(94)00032-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Schramm RE, Szela¸zek J, Clark Jr AV (1996) Ultrasonic measurement of residual stress in the rims of inductively heated railroad wheels. Material Evaluation 54:929–934Google Scholar
  66. Siebel E, Stieler M (1955) Ungleichformige Spannungsverteilung bei schwingender Beanspruchung. VDI Zeitschrift 97(5):121–126Google Scholar
  67. da Silva BL, Ferreira JLA, Araújo JA (2012) Influence of notch geometry on the estimation of the stress intensity factor threshold by considering the Theory of Critical Distances. International Journal of Fatigue 42:258 – 270,  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2011.11.020, fatigue Damage of Structural Materials VIIICrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Stupakov O, Pal’a J, Tomáš I, Bydžovský J, Novák V (2007) Investigation of magnetic response to plastic deformation of low-carbon steel. Materials Science and Engineering:A462(1):351 – 354,  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2006.02.475, international Symposium on Physics of Materials, 2005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Szelązek J, Mackiewicz S, Kowalewski ZL (2009) New samples with artificial voids for ultrasonic investigation of material damage due to creep. NDT & E International 42(2):150 – 156,  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ndteint.2008.11.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Szymczak T (2018) Investigations of material behaviour under monotonic tension using a digital image correlation system. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics 56(3):857–871,  https://doi.org/10.15632/jtam-pl.56.3.857
  71. Szymczak T, Grzywna P, Kowalewski ZL (2013) Modern methods for determining the strength properties of construction materials (in Polish). Transport Samochodowy 1:79–104Google Scholar
  72. Topper T, M Wetzel R, Dean Morrow J (1967) Neuber’s rule applied to fatigue of notched specimens. Report NAEC-ASL-1114, Aeronautical Structures LaboratoryGoogle Scholar
  73. Toussaint F, Tabourot L, Vacher P (2008) Experimental study with a digital image correlation (DIC) method and numerical simulation of an anisotropic elasticplastic commercially pure titanium. Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering 8(3):131 – 143,  https://doi.org/10.1016/s1644-9665(12)60168-xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Trąmpczyński W, Kowalewski ZL (1986) A tension-torsion testing technique. In: Science EA (ed) Proc. Symp. “Techniques for multiaxial creep testing”, London and New York, pp 79–92Google Scholar
  75. Ustrzycka A, Mróz Z, Kowalewski ZL (2017) Experimental analysis and modelling of fatigue crack initiation mechanisms. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics 55(4),  https://doi.org/10.15632/jtam-pl.55.4.1443
  76. Vial-Edwards C, Lira I, Martinez A, Monzenmayer M (2001) Electronic speckle pattern interferometry analysis of tensile tests of semihard copper sheets. Experimental Mechanics 41(1):58–61,  https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02323105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Wahl AM, Beuwkes Jr R (1930) Stress concentration produced by holes and notches. Trans ASME APM-56-11:617–623Google Scholar
  78. Westergaard HM (2014) Theory of Elasticity and Plasticity, Harvard Monographs in Applied Science, vol 3. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  79. Whaley RE (1964) Fatigue and static strength of notched and un-notched aluminium alloy and steel specimens. Experimental Mechanics 2(11):329–334,  https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02326137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Zakharov VA, Ul’yanov AI, Gorkunov ES, Velichko VV (2013) Coercive-force hysteresis of carbon steels during elastic cyclic tensile deformation. Russian Journal of Nondestructive Testing 49(5):260–269,  https://doi.org/10.1134/s1061830913050070CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Zbigniew L. Kowalewski
    • 1
    Email author
  • Aneta Ustrzycka
    • 1
  • Tadeusz Szymczak
    • 2
  • Katarzyna Makowska
    • 2
  • Dominik Kukla
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Fundamental Technological ResearchWarsawPoland
  2. 2.Motor Transport InstituteWarsawPoland

Personalised recommendations