Advertisement

Modelling of Ductile Fracture of Strain-hardening Cement-based Composites - Novel Approaches Based on Microplane and Phase-field Method

  • Christian SteinkeEmail author
  • Imadeddin Zreid
  • Michael Kaliske
Chapter
Part of the Advanced Structured Materials book series (STRUCTMAT, volume 121)

Abstract

Strain-hardening cement-based composites (SHCCs) denote a class ofcomposite materials, which consist of a finely grained cementitious matrix and short,randomly orientated polymer micro fibers. At tensile loading, an initial linear-elasticstage results in the formation of a first crack in the matrix, that is bridged by microfibers and exhibit a very limited crack mouth opening. Additional tensile loadingreveals further increase in the load-bearing capacity at relatively large strains anda high energy absorption capacity due to the formation of additional micro cracks.The ultimate load is governed by structural failure due to pull out or rupture of thefibers bridging a critical crack. A novel approach models the composite behaviorby a plasticity formulation with isotropic hardening, that is coupled to a numericalapproximation for damage or ductile fracture to account for pull out or rupture offibers, respectively.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the financial support of “German Research Foundation“ under Grant KA 1163/19 and of ANSYS Inc., Canonsburg, USA and as well the technical support of the center for information services and high performance computing of TU Dresden for providing access to the Bull HPC-Cluster.

References

  1. Ambati M, Gerasimov T, De Lorenzis L (2015) Phase-field modeling of ductile fracture. Computational Mechanics 55(5):1017–1040,  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-015-1151-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amor H, Marigo JJ, Maurini C (2009) Regularized formulation of the variational brittle fracture with unilateral contact: Numerical experiments. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 57(8):1209 – 1229,  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmps.2009.04.011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Curosu I (2017) Influence of fiber type and matrix composition on the tensile behavior of strain-hardening cement-based composites (shcc) under impact loading. Phd thesis, TU Dresden, DresdenGoogle Scholar
  4. Hofacker M,Welschinger F, Miehe C (2009) A variational–based formulation of regularized brittle fracture. PAMM 9(1):207–208,  https://doi.org/10.1002/pamm.200910078CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Loew PJ, Peters B, Beex LAA (2019) Rate-dependent phase-field damage modeling of rubber and its experimental parameter identification. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 127:266 – 294,  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmps.2019.03.022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Steinke C, Kaliske M (2018) A phase-field crack model based on directional stress decomposition. Computational Mechanics 63(5):1019–1046,  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-018-1635-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Steinke C, Özenç K, Chinaryan G, Kaliske M (2016) A comparative study of the r-adaptive material force approach and the phase-field method in dynamic fracture. International Journal of Fracture 201(1):97–118,  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10704-016-0125-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Zreid I, Kaliske M (2018) A gradient enhanced plasticity–damage microplane model for concrete. Computational Mechanics 62(5):1239–1257,  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-018-1561-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christian Steinke
    • 1
    Email author
  • Imadeddin Zreid
    • 1
  • Michael Kaliske
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute for Structural Analysis, TU DresdenDresdenGermany

Personalised recommendations