Developing a Mastery Learning Curriculum
- 23 Downloads
The traditional model of educating healthcare providers involves passing determined by a bell-shaped curve and subjective evaluations from mentors. Using this model, many healthcare providers advance despite below average performance. In fact, this method has proven to be ineffective to ensure providers deliver patient care without harm. Curriculum development grounded in mastery learning ensures all healthcare providers can deliver a high level of patient care uniformly. In this chapter we integrate the Thomas six-step model for healthcare provider curriculum development with the seven features of mastery learning to develop mastery learning curricula. We provide an example of how an Advanced Cardiac Life Support training curriculum was developed and evaluated. Knowledge about how to apply mastery learning to healthcare training curricula ensures excellence for all providers, patients, and other stakeholders.
KeywordsMastery learning Curriculum development Assessment Skill variability
- 4.The Core Entrustable Professional Activities for Entering Residency. Available from: https://www.aamc.org/initiatives/coreepas/.
- 5.Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Milestones. Available from: http://www.acgme.org/acgmeweb/tabid/430/ProgramandInstitutionalAccreditation/NextAccreditationSystem.Milestones.aspx.
- 11.Thomas PA, Kern DE, Hughes MT, Chen BY. Curriculum development for medical education: a six-step approach. 3rd ed. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press; 2016.Google Scholar
- 15.Bloom BS, editor. Taxonomy of educational objectives: the classification of educational goals. Handbook 1: cognitive domain. New York: David McKay; 1956.Google Scholar
- 16.McGaghie WC, Siddall VJ, Mazmanian PE, Myers J, American College of Chest Physicians Health and Science Policy Committee. Lessons for continuing medical education from simulation research in undergraduate and graduate medical education: effectiveness of continuing medical education: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Educational Guidelines. Chest. 2009;135(3 Suppl):62S–8S.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.Ericsson KA, Pool R. Peak: secrets from the new science of expertise. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt; 2016.Google Scholar
- 24.Issenberg SB, McGaghie WC, Brown DD, et al. Development of multimedia computer-based measures of clinical skills in bedside cardiology. In: Melnick DE, editor. The eighth international Ottawa conference on medical education and assessment proceedings. Evolving assessment: protecting the human dimension. Philadelphia: National Board of Medical Examiners; 2000. p. 821–9.Google Scholar
- 25.Miller MD, Linn RL. Measurement and assessment in teaching. 11th ed. Boston: Pearson; 2013.Google Scholar
- 26.Stufflebeam DL. The checklists development checklist. Western Michigan University Evaluation Center; 2000. Available at: http://www.wmich.edu/evalctr/checklists/cdc.htm.
- 29.American Board of Internal Medicine. Internal medicine policies. Available from: http://www.abim.org/certification/policies/imss/im.aspx-procedures.
- 30.Cummins RO, editor. ACLS provider manual. Dallas: American Heart Association; 2001.Google Scholar
- 35.Wayne DB, Butter J, Didwania A, et al. Advanced cardiac life support checklists for simulation-based education. 2009. Available from: www.mededportal.org/publication/1773.
- 42.Ericsson KA. Why innate talent does not matter in chess, music, sports: what the study of expert performers can tell us about human modifiability. Seminar at the Center for Advanced Studies in the Behavioral Sciences, Stanford, California (February 19th); 2003.Google Scholar