Advertisement

Making Choices and Explaining Them: An Experiment with Strategy Games in Kindergarten

  • Marina De SimoneEmail author
  • Cristina Sabena
Chapter
  • 32 Downloads

Abstract

We discuss how strategy games may be exploited to develop mathematical reasoning and argumentation competencies in kindergarten. According to a design-based methodology, 5-year-old children have been involved in a teaching experiment based on a game called “Thirteen buttons”. We have conducted a qualitative data analysis, based on video recording and integrating two theoretical frameworks: the game theory and the structure of attention frame. Results indicate that, through strategy games, children may experience different aspects of mathematical thinking, such as making choices and checking their consequences, identifying regularities and relationships, producing conjectures and explaining them. Results also point out the key role of the teacher in prompting children to develop these processes, and three different kinds of successful prompts are identified and described. In particular, this may be accomplished during the so-called reflective moments, when children may stop playing and dedicate time to reflect on the game situations, without being immersed in the playing action.

Keywords

Strategy games Making choices Identifying regularities/relationships Making conjectures Argumentation Problem-solving Structure of attention 

References

  1. Bartolini Bussi, M.G. & Sun, X. (Eds.) (2018) Building the foundation: Whole numbers in the primary grades. The 23rd ICMI Study. Springer Nature.Google Scholar
  2. Brousseau, G. (1997). Theory of didactical situations in mathematics. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  3. Cobb, P., Confrey, J., diSessa, A., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2003). Design experiments in educational research. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 9–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ernest, P. (1986). Games. A rationale for their use in the teaching of mathematics in school. Mathematics in School, 15(1), 2–5.Google Scholar
  5. Harvey, J. G., & Bright, G. W. (1985). Basic math games. Palo Alto, CA: Dale Seymour.Google Scholar
  6. Levenson, E. S., Bartolini Bussi, M. G., & Erfjord, I. (2018). Early years mathematics. In T. Dreyfus, M. Artigue, D. Potari, S. Prediger, & K. Ruthven (Eds.), Developing research in mathematics education—twenty years of communication, cooperation and collaboration in Europe (pp. 106–114). Oxon, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Martignone, F., & Sabena, C. (2014). Analysis of argumentation processes in strategic interaction problems. In P. Liljedahl, C. Nicol, S. Oesterle, & D. Allan (Eds.), Proceedings of the joint meeting of PME 38 and PME-NA 36 (Vol. 1, pp. 218–223). Vancouver, Canada: PME.Google Scholar
  8. Mason, J. (2008). Being mathematical with and in front of learners: Attention, awareness, and attitude as sources of differences between teacher educators, teachers and learners. In B. Jaworski & T. Wood (Eds.), Handbook of Mathematics Teacher Education (Vol. 4, pp. 31–55). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Brill Sense.Google Scholar
  9. MIUR. (2012). Indicazioni nazionali per il curricolo della scuola dell’infanzia e del primo ciclo di istruzione. Annali della Pubblica Istruzione, Numero Speciale. Le Monnier.Google Scholar
  10. Mousoulides, N. & Sriraman, B. (2014). Heuristics in mathematics education. InEncyclopedia of Mathematics Education: Edited by Lerman, S. 267–272. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4978-8.
  11. Oldfield, B. J. (1991). Games in the learning of mathematics: 1: A classification. Mathematics in School, 20(1), 41–43.Google Scholar
  12. Perry, B., & Dockett, S. (2008). Young children’s access to powerful mathematical ideas. In L. English (Ed.), Handbook of international research in mathematics education (pp. 81–112). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Radford, L. (2010). The eye as a theoretician: seeing structures in generalizing activities. For the Learning of Mathematics, 30(2), 2–7.Google Scholar
  14. Sabena, C. (2018). Exploring the contribution of gestures to mathematical argumentation processes from a semiotic perspective. In G. Kaiser, H. Forgasz, M. Graven, A. Kuznia, E. Simmt, & B. Xu (Eds.), Invited lectures from the 13th international congress on mathematics education (pp. 541–559). Cham, Switzerland: Springer Open.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Von Neumann, J., & Morgenstern, O. (1947). Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of GenevaGenevaSwitzerland
  2. 2.University of TorinoTorinoItaly

Personalised recommendations