Advertisement

Making Room for Religion in the Workplace in a Diverse Society: A Comparative Perspective

  • Nicole GarbinEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice book series (IUSGENT, volume 77)

Abstract

In March 2017, almost seventeen years after the adoption of Directive 2000/78/EC establishing the general framework for equal treatment in employment and occupation, the Court of Justice of the European Union delivered its two first and long-awaited judgments concerning the manifestation of beliefs in the workplace in the cases Achbita (Case C-157/15) and Bougnaoui (Case C-188/15). Both cases concern Muslim women employees in private companies who had been dismissed for wearing a headscarf at work. The purpose of this chapter is to explore from a comparative perspective how protection against discrimination on the grounds of religion and freedom of religion is granted in the workplace, and how protection is expanded or restricted in light of concepts such as ‘neutrality’ or ‘undue hardship’. The focus of the chapter is the private workplace, but references (where relevant) are made to rules governing the public sector. After a short introduction on the international legal framework, the chapter examines how freedom of religion and protection against discrimination are regulated in Europe under the European Convention on Human Rights and in EU law. The second part sheds light on the USA and Canada’s safeguards against religious discrimination in labour relations, analysing the scope of protection and its limits. The contribution concludes with a comparison of the systems examined in order to establish whether and to what extent similar tensions can be identified and whether a convergence of solutions is suitable and possible in the future.

Keywords

Labour law Non-discrimination Religion Human rights 

References

  1. Alidadi K (2012a) Muslim women made redundant: unintended signals in Belgian and Dutch case law on religious dress in private sector employment and unemployment. In: Alidadi K, Foblets M, Vrielink J (eds) A test of faith? Religious diversity and accommodation in the European workplace. Ashgate, Farnham-Burlington, pp 245–282Google Scholar
  2. Alidadi K (2012b) Reasonable accommodations for religion and belief: adding value to Article 9 ECHR and the European Union’s anti-discrimination approach to employment? Eur Law Rev 37(6):693–715Google Scholar
  3. Bader V, Alidadi K, Vermeulen F (2013) Religious diversity and reasonable accommodation in the workplace in six European countries: an introduction. Int J Discrimination Law 13(2–3):54–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beaman LG (2012) Introduction, exploring reasonable accommodation. In: Beaman LG (ed) Reasonable accommodation, managing religious diversity. UBC Press, Vancouver-Toronto, pp 1–12Google Scholar
  5. Bouchar G, Taylor C (2008) Building the future—a time for reconciliation. Available at www.mce.gouv.qc.ca/publications/CCPARDC/rapport-final-integral-en.pdf
  6. Brems E (2015) Ebrahimian v France: headscarf ban upheld for entire public sector. Strasbourg observer. Available at www.strasbourgobservers.com/2015/11/27/ebrahimian-v-france-headscarf-ban-upheld-for-entire-public-sector/
  7. Brems E (2017) Analysis: European court of justice allows bans on religious dress in the workplace. Blog of the IACL, AIDC. Available at www.iacl-aidc-blog.org/2017/03/25/analysis-european-court-of-justice-allows-bans-on-religious-dress-in-the-workplace/
  8. Bribosia E, Ringelheim J, Rorive I (2010) Reasonable accommodation for religious minorities: a promising concept for european discrimination law? Maastricht J Eur Comp Law 17:137–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Caceres G (2012) A perspective from across the Atlantic: “the faith at work” movement in the United States. A new management model for religious diversity in the European workplace? In: Alidadi K, Foblets M, Vrielink J (eds) A test of faith? Religious diversity and accommodation in the European workplace. Ashgate, Farnham-Burlington, pp 283–316Google Scholar
  10. Gibson M (2013) The God “dilution”? Religion, discrimination and the case for reasonable accommodation. Camb Law J 72(3):578–616CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Henrard K (2012) Duties of reasonable accommodation in relation to religion and the European Court of human rights: a closer look at the prohibition of discrimination, the freedom of religion and related duties of state neutrality. Erasmus Law Rev 5(1):59–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hervieu N (2013) Un nouvel équilibre européen dans l’appréhension des convictions religieuses au travail. “Actualités Droits-Libertés” du CREDOF. Available at www.revdh.wordpress.com/2013/01/24/nouvel-equilibre-europeen-apprehension-convictions-religieuses-au-travail/
  13. Howard E (2017) Islamic headscarves and the CJEU: Achbita and Bougnaoui. Maastricht J Eur Comp Law 24(3):348–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Loenen T (2009) The headscarf debate, approaching the intersection of sex, religion and race under the European convention on human rights and EC equality law. In: Schiek D, Chege V (eds) European Union non-discrimination law, comparative perspectives on multidimensional equality law. Abingdon-New York, Routledge-Cavendish, pp 313–328Google Scholar
  15. Moon G (2006) From equal treatment to appropriate treatment: what lessons can Canadian equality law on dignity and on reasonable accommodation teach the United Kingdom? Eur Hum Rights Law Rev 6:695–721Google Scholar
  16. Ouald Chaib S (2017) European Court of Justice keeps the door to religious discrimination in the private workplace opened. The European Court of Human Rights could close it. Strasbourg observer. Available at www.strasbourgobservers.com/2017/03/27/european-court-of-justice-keeps-the-door-to-religious-discrimination-in-the-private-workplace-opened-the-european-court-of-human-rights-could-close-it/
  17. Ouald Chaib S, David V (2017) European Court of justice keeps the door to religious discrimination in the private workplace opened. The European Court of human rights could close it. Strasbourg observers. Available at www.strasbourgobservers.com/2017/03/27/european-court-of-justice-keeps-the-door-to-religious-discrimination-in-the-private-workplace-opened-the-european-court-of-human-rights-could-close-it/
  18. Peroni L (2013) Eweida and others v. the United Kingdom (Part I): taking freedom of religion more seriously. Strasbourg observers. Available at www.strasbourgobservers.com/2013/01/17/eweida-and-others-v-the-united-kingdom-part-i-taking-freedom-of-religion-more-seriously/
  19. Pin A (2014) Does Europe need neutrality? The old continent in search of identity. Brigham Young Univ Law Rev 605–634Google Scholar
  20. Romero AC (2013) The European court of human rights: between Christian neutrality and the fear of Islam. N Z J Public Int Law 11(1):75–102Google Scholar
  21. Silbiger SL (1985) Heaven can wait: judicial interpretation of title VII’s religious accommodation requirements since Transworld Airlines v Hardison. Fordham Law Rev 53(4):839–861Google Scholar
  22. Sir Dingemans J, Yeginsu C, Cross T, Masood H (2013) The protections for religious rights: law and practice. OUP, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  23. Svensson E (2013) The constitutionalization of freedom of religion in the European union: what changes are the charter of fundamental rights expected to bring about? In: Cianitto C, Cole Durham D Jr, Ferrari S, Thayer D (eds) Law, religion, constitution: freedom of religion, equal treatment, and the law. Ashgate, Farnham–Burlington, pp 267–283Google Scholar
  24. Vickers L (2016a) Religious freedom, religious discrimination and the workplace. Hart, Oxford-PortlandGoogle Scholar
  25. Vickers L (2016b) ECJ headscarf series (2): the role of choice; and the margin of appreciation. Strasbourg observers. Available at www.strasbourgobservers.com/2016/09/08/blog-series-the-role-of-choice-and-the-margin-of-appreciation/
  26. Zucca L (2012) A secular Europe, law and religion in the European constitutional landscape. OUP, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Minority Rights Group EuropeBudapestHungary

Personalised recommendations