Advertisement

Living with Difference Otherwise

  • Tilmann HeilEmail author
Chapter
  • 17 Downloads
Part of the Global Diversities book series (GLODIV)

Abstract

The question introduced is how migrants make their way within changing social contexts of cultural complexity. The knowledge derived from pre-migration experiences of ethnic, religious, and linguistic difference and power asymmetries, and gathered during migration and upon arrival is at the heart of this comparative ethnography of Casamance and Catalonia, which traces continuities and change. Grounded in situational analysis, I draw from practice theorists as I am primarily interested in people’s creativity and tactics as opposed to hegemonic constraints. Different from its common use, the process of conviviality embraces conflictual and cooperative situations. I analytically juxtapose conviviality to cosmopolitanism and civility and introduce the basic practices of interaction, negotiation, and translation and their co-constitution with convivial space. The chapter ends with a methodological reflection.

References

  1. Adloff, F. (2019). Practices of conviviality and the social and political theory of convivialism. Novos Estudos—CEBRAP, 38, 35–47.  https://doi.org/10.25091/s01013300201900010002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Agamben, G. (1998). Homo sacer. Sovereign power and bare life (Meridian: Crossing aesthetics). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Aja, E., & Arango, J. (2006). Veinte años de inmigración en España: Perspectiva jurídica y sociológica (1985–2004). Barcelona: Fundació CIDOB.Google Scholar
  4. Alexander, C., & Alleyne, B. (2002). Framing difference: Racial and ethnic studies in twentyfirst-century Britain. Introduction. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 25, 541–551.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870220136628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Alphandéry, C., Ancel, G., Araujo, A. M., et al. (2013). Manifeste convivialiste: Déclaration d’interdépendance (Documents). Lormont: le Bord de l’eau.Google Scholar
  6. Amin, A. (2002). Ethnicity and the multicultural city: Living with diversity. Environment and Planning A, 34(6), 959–981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Amin, A. (2012). Land of strangers. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  8. Anderson, B. (2006). Imagined communities. Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  9. Andersson, R. (2014). Illegality, inc: Clandestine migration and the business of bordering Europe (California series in public anthropology) (Vol. 28). Oakland, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  10. Ang, I., Brand, J. E., Noble, G., & Wilding, D. (2002). Living diversity: Australia’s multicultural future. HSS papers 19. Retrieved June 13, 2012, from http://epublications.bond.edu.au/hss_pubs/19.
  11. Asad, T. (1986). The concept of cultural translation in British social anthropology. In J. Clifford & G. E. Marcus (Eds.), Writing culture. The poetics and politics of ethnography (pp. 141–164). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  12. Ávila, R. (1993). Nueva perspectiva de las migraciones interiores españolas. Anales de Geografía de la Universidad Complutense, 13, 111–126.Google Scholar
  13. Back, L., & Sinha, S. (2016). Multicultural conviviality in the midst of racism’s ruins. Journal of Intercultural Studies, 37, 517–532.  https://doi.org/10.1080/07256868.2016.1211625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Basch, L. G., Glick Schiller, N., & Szanton Blanc, C. (1994). Nations unbound: Transnational projects, postcolonial predicaments, and deterritorialized nation-states. Amsterdam: Gordon and Breach.Google Scholar
  15. Baumann, G. (1996). Contesting culture: Discourses of identity in multi-ethnic London. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Baumann, G. (1997). Dominant and demotic discourses of culture: Their relevance to multi-ethnic alliances. In P. Werbner & T. Modood (Eds.), Debating cultural hybridity (pp. 209–225). London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  17. Blommaert, J., Collins, J., & Slembrouck, S. (2005). Spaces of multilingualism. Language & Communication, 25, 197–216.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2005.05.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Boisvert, R. D. (2010). Convivialism: A philosophical manifesto. The Pluralist, 5(2), 57–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Bourdieu, P. (2007). Outline of a theory of practice (Cambridge studies in social and cultural anthropology) (Vol. 16, 21st ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Boyd, R. (2006). The value of civility? Urban Studies, 43(5), 863–878.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Breckenridge, C. A., Pollock, S. I., Bhabha, H. K., & Chakrabarty, D. (Eds.). (2002). Cosmopolitanism. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Brooks, G. E. (1993). Landlords and strangers: Ecology, society, and trade in Western Africa, 1000–1630 (African states and societies in history). Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  23. Brubaker, R. (2002). Ethnicity without groups. European Journal of Sociology, 43, 163–189.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003975602001066.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Cantone, C. (2011). Making and remaking mosques in Senegal (Islam in Africa) (Vol. 13). Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
  25. Cornelius, W. A. (1982). Interviewing undocumented immigrants: Methodological reflections based on fieldwork in Mexico and the U.S. International Migration Review, 16(2), 378–411.Google Scholar
  26. Corsín Jiménez, A. (2003). On space as a capacity. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 9, 137–153.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9655.t01-1-00008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Crenshaw, K. W. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 140, 139–167.Google Scholar
  28. Cuttitta, P. (2018). Delocalization, humanitarianism, and human rights: The Mediterranean border between exclusion and inclusion. Antipode, 50, 783–803.  https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. de Certeau, M. (1988). The practice of everyday life. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  30. de Jong, F. (2002). Politicians of the sacred grove: Citizenship and ethnicity in southern Senegal. Africa, 72(2), 203–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. de Jong, F. (2007). Masquerades of modernity: Power and secrecy in Casamance, Senegal. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Delanty, G. (2006). The cosmopolitan imagination: Critical cosmopolitanism and social theory. The British Journal of Sociology, 57, 25–47.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-4446.2006.00092.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Diouf, M. (2000). The Senegalese Murid trade diaspora and the making of a vernacular cosmopolitanism. Public Culture, 12(3), 679–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Dorman, S., Hammett, D., & Nugent, P. (Eds.). (2007). Making nations, creating strangers: States and citizenship in Africa (African social studies series) (Vol. 16). Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
  35. Dreyfus, M., & Juillard, C. (2005). Le plurilinguisme au Sénégal: Langues et identités en devenir (Dictionnaires et langues). Paris: Karthala.Google Scholar
  36. Fassin, D. (2012). Humanitarian reason: A moral history of the present times. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  37. Foucault, M. (1991). Die Ordnung des Diskurses. Frankfurt am Main: Fischer-Taschenbuch-Verlag.Google Scholar
  38. Fyfe, N., Bannister, J., & Kearns, A. (2006). (In)civility and the city. Urban Studies, 43(5), 853–861.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Gable, E. (2010). Worldliness in out of the way places. Cadernos de Estudos Africanos, 18/19, 75–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Geertz, C. (1973). Thick description: Toward an interpretive theory of culture. In C. Geertz (Ed.), The interpretation of cultures: Selected essays (pp. 3–30). New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  41. Gellner, E., & Waterbury, J. (Eds.). (1977). Patrons and clients: In Mediterranean societies. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
  42. Genova, N. P. d. (2002). Migrant “illegality” and deportability in everyday life. Annual Review of Anthropology, 31, 419–447.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.31.040402.085432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Geschiere, P. (2009). The perils of belonging: Autochthony, citizenship, and exclusion in Africa and Europe. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Gilroy, P. (2005). Postcolonial melancholia (Wellek library lectures). New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Glick Schiller, N., Çağlar, A., & Guldbrandsen, T. C. (2006). Beyond the ethnic lens: Locality, globality, and born-again incorporation. American Ethnologist, 33, 612–633.  https://doi.org/10.1525/ae.2006.33.4.612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Glick Schiller, N., Darieva, T., & Gruner-Domic, S. (2011). Defining cosmopolitan sociability in a transnational age: An introduction. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 34, 399–418.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2011.533781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Gluckman, M. (1958). Analysis of a social situation in modern Zululand (The Rhodes-Livingstone papers) (Vol. 28). Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Goffman, E. (1966). Behavior in public places. Notes on the social organization of gatherings. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  49. Goffman, E. (1990). The presentation of self in everyday life. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  50. Goffman, E. (2008a). Interaction ritual: Essays in face-to-face behavior (4th ed.). New Brunswick, NJ: Aldine Transaction.Google Scholar
  51. Goffman, E. (2008b). On face-work. In E. Goffman (Ed.), Interaction ritual. Essays in face-to-face behavior (4th ed., pp. 5–45). New Brunswick, NJ: Aldine Transaction.Google Scholar
  52. Gozálvez Pérez, V. (1995). Inmigrantes marroquíes y senegaleses en la España mediterránea. Valencia: Generalitat Valenciana. Conselleria de Treball i Afers Socials.Google Scholar
  53. Hall, S. (1993). Culture, community, nation. Cultural Studies, 7(3), 349–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Hall, S., & Chen, K.-H. (2005). Cultural studies and the politics of internationalization: An interview with Stuart Hall. In D. Morley & K.-H. Chen (Eds.), Stuart Hall: Critical dialogues in cultural studies (Comedia) (pp. 393–404). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  55. Hann, C. (1996). Introduction: Political society and civil anthropology. In C. Hann & E. C. Dunn (Eds.), Civil society: Challenging western models (pp. 1–26). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  56. Hannerz, U. (1990). Cosmopolitans and locals in world culture. Theory, Culture & Society, 7(2-3), 237–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Hannerz, U. (2003). Being there … and there … and there! Reflections on multi-site ethnography. Ethnography, 4, 201–216.  https://doi.org/10.1177/14661381030042003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Heil, T. (2019). Conviviality as diasporic knowledge. African Diaspora, 11(1–2), 53–70.  https://doi.org/10.1163/18725465-01101006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Heil, T., & Meissner, F. (2020). Deromanticizing integration: On the importance of convivial disintegration. Migration Studies online first.Google Scholar
  60. Instituto Nacional de Estadística (INE). (2011). Revisión del padrón municipal 2010: Datos a nivel nacional, comunidad autónoma y provincia. Retrieved May 11, 2011, from www.ine.es.
  61. Jabardo Velasco, M. (2006). Senegaleses en España: Conexiones entre origen y destino. Madrid: Ministerio de Trabajo y Asuntos Sociales.Google Scholar
  62. Juillard, C. (1995). Sociolinguistique urbaine: La vie des langues à Ziguinchor (Sénégal). Paris: CNRS Editions.Google Scholar
  63. King, R. (2000). Southern Europe in the changing global map of migration. In R. King, G. Lazaridis, & C. G. Tsardanidåes (Eds.), Eldorado or fortress? Migration in southern Europe (pp. 13–26). Basingstoke: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. King, R. (2001). The troubled passage: Migration and cultural encounters in southern Europe. In R. King (Ed.), The Mediterranean passage: Migration and new cultural encounters in southern Europe (Liverpool studies in European regional cultures) (Vol. 9, pp. 1–21). Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.Google Scholar
  65. King, A. (2016). Thinking with Bourdieu against Bourdieu: A ‘practical’ critique of the habitus. Sociological Theory, 18, 417–433.  https://doi.org/10.1111/0735-2751.00109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Kuba, R., & Lentz, C. (Eds.). (2006). Land and the politics of belonging in West Africa (African social studies series) (Vol. 9). Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
  67. Lamont, M., & Aksartova, S. (2002). Ordinary cosmopolitanisms. Theory, Culture & Society, 19(4), 1–25.Google Scholar
  68. Lamphere, L. (1992). Introduction: The shaping of diversity. In L. Lamphere (Ed.), Structuring diversity: Ethnographic perspectives on the new immigration (pp. 1–34). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  69. Landau, L. B. (2014). Conviviality, rights, and conflict in Africa’s urban estuaries. Politics and Society, 42, 359–380.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329214543258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Lapiņa, L. (2016). Besides conviviality. Nordic Journal of Migration Research, 6, 33–41.  https://doi.org/10.1515/njmr-2016-0002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Lentz, C. (2013). Land, mobility, and belonging in West Africa: Natives and strangers. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  72. Levitt, P. (1998). Social remittances: Migration driven local-level forms of cultural diffusion. International Migration Review, 32(4), 926–948.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Levitt, P. (2001). The transnational villagers. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  74. Levitt, P., & Glick Schiller, N. (2004). Conceptualizing simultaneity: A transnational social field perspective on society. International Migration Review, 38(3), 1002–1039.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Levitt, P., & Lamba-Nieves, D. (2011). Social remittances revisited. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 37, 1–22.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183x.2011.521361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Lofland, L. H. (1989). Social-life in the public realm: A review. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 17(4), 453–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Lofland, L. H. (1998). The public realm: Exploring the city’s quintessential social territory (Communication and social order). Hawthorne, CA: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  78. Loimeier, R. (2000). L’Islam ne se vend plus: The Islamic reform movement and the state in Senegal. Journal of Religion in Africa, 30(2), 168–190.Google Scholar
  79. Low, S. M. (2008). On the plaza: The politics of public space and culture. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  80. Ma Agustín, L. (2003). Forget victimization: Granting agency to migrants. Development, 46, 30–36.  https://doi.org/10.1177/10116370030463005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Mark, P. (2002). “Portuguese” style and Luso-African identity: Precolonial Senegambia, sixteenth-nineteenth centuries. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  82. Mauss, M. (1954). The gift: Forms and functions of exchange in archaic societies. London: Cohen & West.Google Scholar
  83. Mazzucato, V. (2008). Simultaneity and networks in transnational migration: Lessons learned from an SMS methodology. In J. DeWind & J. Holdaway (Eds.), Migration and development within and across borders: Research and policy perspectives on internal and international migration (pp. 69–100). Geneva: International Organization for Migration.Google Scholar
  84. Mazzucato, V. (2009). Bridging boundaries with a transnational research approach: A simultaneous matched sample methodology. In M.-A. Falzon (Ed.), Multi-sited ethnography: Theory, praxis and locality in contemporary research (pp. 215–231). Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  85. Mbembe, A. J. (1992). The banality of power and the aesthetics of vulgarity in the postcolony. Public Culture, 4, 1–30.  https://doi.org/10.1215/08992363-4-2-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Mbembe, J. A. (2001). On the postcolony. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  87. McCall, L. (2005). The complexity of intersectionality. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 30, 1771–1800.  https://doi.org/10.1086/426800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Mitchell, J. C. (1968). The Kalela dance: Aspects of social relationships among urban Africans in northern Rhodesia (The Rhodes-Livingstone papers) (Vol. 27). Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  89. Mitchell, J. C. (1987). Cities, society and social perception: A central African perspective. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
  90. Mitchell, J. P. (2007). A fourth critic of the enlightenment: Michel de Certeau and the ethnography of subjectivity. Social Anthropology, 15, 89–106.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8676.2007.00001.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Napolitano, V., & Pratten, D. (2007). Michel de Certeau: Ethnography and the challenge of plurality. Social Anthropology, 15, 1–12.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8676.2007.00005.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Neal, S., Bennett, K., Cochrane, A., & Mohan, G. (2017). Lived experiences of multiculture: The new social and spatial relations of diversity. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Noble, G. (2009). Everyday cosmopolitanism and the labour of intercultural community. In A. Wise & S. Velayutham (Eds.), Everyday multiculturalism (pp. 46–65). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Nowicka, M., & Heil, T. (2015, June 25). On the analytical and normative dimensions of conviviality and cosmopolitanism. Lecture held on 25 June 2015 at the Eberhard Karls University Tübingen. Retrieved Jan 27, 2020, from www.euroethno.hu-berlin.de/de/forschung/labore/migration/nowicka-heil_onthe-analytical-and-normative-dimensions-of-conviviality.pdf.
  95. Nowicka, M., & Vertovec, S. (2014). Comparing convivialities: Dreams and realities of living-with-difference. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 17, 341–356.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549413510414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Okely, J. (1992). Anthropology and autobiography: Participatory experience and embodied knowledge. In J. Okely & H. Callaway (Eds.), Anthropology and autobiography (ASA monographs) (Vol. 29, pp. 1–28). London, New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Ortner, S. B. (2005). Subjectivity and cultural critique. Anthropological Theory, 5, 31–52.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1463499605050867.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Ortner, S. B. (2016). Dark anthropology and its others. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 6, 47–73.  https://doi.org/10.14318/hau6.1.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Overing, J., & Passes, A. (Eds.). (2000). The anthropology of love and anger: The aesthetics of conviviality in native Amazonia. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  100. Papadopoulos, D., & Tsianos, V. (2008). The autonomy of migration: The animals of undocumented mobility. In A. Hickey-Moody & P. Malins (Eds.), Deleuzian encounters: Studies in contemporary social issues (pp. 223–235). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  101. Parkin, D. (1974). Language switching in Nairobi. In W. H. Whiteley (Ed.), Language in Kenya, Ethiopia, Tanzania, Uganda, Zambia (Ford foundation language surveys) (pp. 189–216). Nairobi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  102. Rabinow, P. (1977). Reflections on fieldwork in Morocco (Quantum books). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  103. Rampton, B. (2011). From ‘multi-ethnic adolescent heteroglossia’ to ‘contemporary urban vernaculars’. Language & Communication, 31, 276–294.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2011.01.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Riccio, B. (2011). Exploring Senegalese translocal spaces: Reflections on multi-sited research. In S. Coleman & P. von Hellermann (Eds.), Multi-sited ethnography: Problems and possibilities in the translocation of research methods (Routledge advances in research methods) (Vol. 3, pp. 73–86). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  105. Robertson, R. (1995). Glocalization: Time-space and homogeneity-heterogeneity. In M. Featherstone, S. Lash, & R. Robertson (Eds.), Global modernities (pp. 25–44). London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Rogers, A., & Vertovec, S. (Eds.). (1995). The urban context: Ethnicity, social networks, and situational analysis (Explorations in anthropology). Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
  107. Rubin, H. J., & Rubin, I. (1995). Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  108. Sarró, R. (2009). The politics of religious change on the upper Guinea coast: Iconoclasm done and undone (International African library) (Vol. 38). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  109. Schirmer, W., Weidenstedt, L., & Reich, W. (2012). From tolerance to respect in inter-ethnic contexts. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 38, 1049–1065.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2012.681448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Sennett, R. (2004). Respect: The formation of character in an age of inequality. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  111. Sennett, R. (2005). Civility. Urban Age, Bulletin, 1, 1–3.Google Scholar
  112. Silverstein, P. A. (2005). Immigrant racialization and the new savage slot: Race, migration, and immigration in the new Europe. Annual Review of Anthropology, 34, 363–384.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.34.081804.120338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Silvestre Rodríguez, J. (2002). Las emigraciones interiores en España durante los siglos XIX y XX: Una revisión bibliográfica. Ager, 2(8), 227–248.Google Scholar
  114. Smith, M. G. (1974). The plural society in the British West Indies. Kingston: Sangster’s Book Stores.Google Scholar
  115. Smith, P., Phillips, T. L., & King, R. D. (2010). Incivility: The rude stranger in everyday life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Solé Puig, C. (2000). Inmigración interior e inmigración exterior. Papers: Revista de Sociología, 60, 211–224.Google Scholar
  117. Solé Puig, C., Sordé Martí, T., Serradell Pumareda, O., Alcalde, R., de Sanmamed, F. F., Ainhoa, G. P., et al. (2011). Cohesión social e inmigración: Aportaciones científicas y discursos políticos. Revista Internacional de Sociología, 69(1), 9–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Sow, P. (2004). Sénégalais et Gambien en Catalogne (Espagne): Analyse géo-sociologique de leurs réseaux spatiaux et sociaux. Tesis para el doctorado en Geografía Humana. Barcelona: Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.Google Scholar
  119. Spickard, P. R. (Ed.). (2013). Multiple identities: Migrants ethnicity and membership. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  120. St. Jacques, E. (2009). Economic mobility and the transnational practices of West Africans in Catalonia, Spain. Unpublished PhD Thesis, University of Florida, Gainesville.Google Scholar
  121. Stolcke, V. (1995). Talking culture: New boundaries, new rhetorics of exclusion in Europe. Current Anthropology, 36(1), 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. Sylla, A. (1980). La philosophie morale des Wolof. Dissertation, Atelier Réproduction des Thèses Université de Lille 3, Lille.Google Scholar
  123. Ticktin, M. (2006). Policing and humanitarianism in France: Immigration and the turn to law as a state of exception. Interventions, 7, 346–368.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13698010500268148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. Tsianos, V., & Karakayali, S. (2010). Transnational migration and the emergence of the European border regime: An ethnographic analysis. European Journal of Social Theory, 13, 373–387.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431010371761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. Tyler, K. (2016). The suburban paradox of conviviality and racism in postcolonial Britain. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 1–17.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2016.1245607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. Valentine, G. (2008). Living with difference: Reflections on geographies of encounter. Progress in Human Geography, 32(3), 323–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  127. van der Veer, P. (2002). Transnational religion: Hindu and Muslim movements. Global Networks: A Journal of Transnational Affairs, 2, 95–109.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0374.00030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. van Nieuwenhuyze, I. (2009). Getting by in Europe’s urban labour markets: Senegambian migrants’ strategies for survival, documentation and mobility. IMISCOE dissertations, Amsterdam University Press, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  129. Vertovec, S. (2007a). New complexities of cohesion in Britain. Super-diversity, transnationalism and social integration. Wetherby: Commission on Integration and Cohesion.Google Scholar
  130. Vertovec, S. (2007b). Super-diversity and its implications. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 30(6), 1024–1054.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  131. Vertovec, S. (2009a). Conceiving and researching diversity. MMG Working Papers 09-01.Google Scholar
  132. Vertovec, S. (2009b). Cosmopolitanism in attitude, practice and competence. MMG Working Papers 09-08.Google Scholar
  133. Vertovec, S. (2012). “Diversity” and the social imaginary. European Journal of Sociology, 53, 287–312.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S000397561200015X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  134. Vertovec, S. (Ed.). (2015). Diversities old and new: Migration and socio-spatial patterns in New York, Singapore and Johannesburg (Global diversities). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  135. Vigh, H. (2011). Vigilance: On conflict, social invisibility, and negative potentiality. Social Analysis: The International Journal of Social and Cultural Practice, 55, 93–114.  https://doi.org/10.3167/sa.2011.550306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  136. Vigh, H. (2015). Mobile misfortune. Culture Unbound: Journal of Current Cultural Research, 7, 233–253.  https://doi.org/10.3384/cu.2000.1525.1572233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  137. Villalón, L. A. (2004). Islamism in West Africa: Senegal. African Studies Review, 47(2), 61–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  138. Walters, W. (2011). Foucault and frontiers: Notes on the birth of the humanitarian border. In U. Bröckling, S. Krasmann, & T. Lemke (Eds.), Governmentality: Current issues and future challenges (Routledge studies in social and political thought) (Vol. 71, pp. 138–164). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  139. Werbner, P. (1999). Global pathways: Working class cosmopolitans and the creation of transnational ethnic worlds. Social Anthropology, 7(1), 17–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  140. Werbner, P. (2006). Vernacular cosmopolitanism. Theory, Culture & Society, 23(2/3), 496–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  141. Wessendorf, S. (2014). Commonplace diversity: Social relations in a super-diverse context (Global diversities). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  142. Wimmer, A. (2004). Does ethnicity matter? Everyday group formation in three Swiss immigrant neighbourhoods. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 27(1), 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  143. Wimmer, A., & Glick Schiller, N. (2002). Methodological nationalism and beyond: Nation-state building, migration and the social sciences. Global Networks: A Journal of Transnational Affairs, 2, 301–334.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0374.00043.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  144. Wise, A., & Noble, G. (2016). Convivialities: An orientation. Journal of Intercultural Studies, 37, 423–431.  https://doi.org/10.1080/07256868.2016.1213786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  145. Wolf, E. R. (1966). Kinship, friendship, and patron-client relations in complex societies. In M. Banton (Ed.), The social anthropology of complex societies (pp. 1–22). Edinburgh: Tavistock Publications.Google Scholar
  146. Young, I. M. (1986). The ideal of community and the politics of difference. Social Theory and Practice, 12, 1–26.  https://doi.org/10.5840/soctheorpract198612113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  147. Zapata-Barrero, R. (2008). La inmigración en naciones minoritarias: Flandes, Quebec y Cataluña en perspectiva. Barcelona: Icaria.Google Scholar
  148. Zapata-Barrero, R. (2009). Policies and public opinion towards immigrants: The Spanish case. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 32(7), 1101–1120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
  2. 2.National Museum (PPGAS), Universidade Federal do Rio de JaneiroRio de JaneiroBrazil

Personalised recommendations