Advertisement

Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction

  • Hani SbitanyEmail author
Chapter
  • 65 Downloads

Abstract

Implant-based breast reconstruction continues to be the most utilized technique for postmastectomy reconstruction in the United States, with over 85,000 cases performed in 2015. Techniques involving both two-stage (expander-implant) reconstruction and single-stage reconstruction have advanced significantly in the past decade, with excellent aesthetic outcomes consistently being achieved due to improved tools such as cohesive anatomic implants and acellular dermal matrices (ADM).

Keywords

Prepectoral Breast reconstruction Surgery Implant ADM Inflammatory breast cancer 

Notes

Disclosures

Dr. Sbitany is a consultant for Allergan, Inc. He received no compensation or support for this chapter.

Supplementary material

Video 6.1

A patient with bilateral submuscular prosthetic breast reconstruction, 2 years following completion, exhibiting animation deformity (MP4 6381 kb)

Video 6.2

360 degrees view of tissue expander following prepectoral placement and full ADM coverage (MP4 11693 kb)

Video 6.3a

The patient from Fig. 6.6, shown contracting her pectoralis major muscles (a) prior to conversion with her submuscular reconstruction (MOV 37396 kb)

Video 6.3b

The patient from Fig. 6.6, shown contracting her pectoralis major muscles (b) following neo-prepectoral pocket conversion and elimination of her animation deformity (MOV 61386 kb)

Video 6.4a

The patient from Fig. 6.13, shown contracting her pectoralis major muscles (a) prior to conversion with her submuscular reconstruction (MOV 30515 kb)

Video 6.4b

The patient from Fig. 6.13, shown contracting her pectoralis major muscles (b) following neo-prepectoral pocket conversion and elimination of her animation deformity (MOV 44651 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Sbitany H, Amalfi AN, Langstein HN. Preferences in choosing between breast reconstruction options: a survey of female plastic surgeons. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124(6):1781–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    American Society of Plastic Surgeons. Plastic surgery procedural statistics. 2015. Available at: https://www.plasticsurgery.org/news/plastic-surgery-statistics. Accessed 6 Nov 2016.
  3. 3.
    Strock LL. Two-stage expander implant reconstruction: recent experience. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124(5):1429–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Roostaeian J, Sanchez I, Vardanian A, Herrera F, Galanis C, Da Lio A, Festekjian J, Crisera CA. Comparison of immediate implant placement versus the staged tissue expander technique in breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;129(6):909e–18e.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Colwell AS, Damjanovic B, Zahedi B, Medford-Davis L, Hertl C, Austen WG Jr. Retrospective review of 331 consecutive immediate single-stage implant reconstructions with acellular dermal matrix: indications, complications, trends, and costs. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;128(6):1170–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Serletti JM, Fosnot J, Nelson JA, Disa JJ, Bucky LP. Breast reconstruction after breast cancer. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;127(6):124e–35e.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Spear SL, Willey SC, Feldman ED, Cocilovo C, Sidawy M, Al-Attar A, Hannan C, Seiboth L, Nahabedian MY. Nipple-sparing mastectomy for prophylactic and therapeutic indications. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;128(5):1005–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Peled AW, Duralde E, Foster RD, Fiscalini AS, Esserman LJ, Hwang ES, Sbitany H. Patient-reported outcomes and satisfaction after total skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate expander-implant reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 2014;72(Suppl 1):S48–52.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wang F, Peled AW, Garwood E, Fiscalini AS, Sbitany H, Foster RD, Alvarado M, Ewing C, Hwang ES, Esserman LJ. Total skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction: an evolution of technique and assessment of outcomes. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21(10):3223–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sbitany H, Sandeen SN, Amalfi AN, Davenport MS, Langstein HN. Acellular dermis-assisted prosthetic breast reconstruction versus complete submuscular coverage: a head-to-head comparison of outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124(6):1735–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Weichman KE, Wilson SC, Weinstein AL, Hazen A, Levine JP, Choi M, Karp NS. The use of acellular dermal matrix in immediate two-stage tissue expander breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;129(5):1049–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hammond DC, Schmitt WP, O'Connor EA. Treatment of breast animation deformity in implant-based reconstruction with pocket change to the subcutaneous position. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015;135(6):1540–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Snyderman RK, Guthrie RH. Reconstruction of the female breast following radical mastectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1971;47(6):565–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sbitany H, Piper M, Lentz R. Prepectoral breast reconstruction: a safe alternative to submuscular prosthetic reconstruction following nipple-sparing mastectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017;140(3):432–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sbitany H. Important considerations for performing Prepectoral breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017;140(6S Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction):7S–13S. Sigalove S. Options in acellular dermal matrix-device assembly. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017;140(6S Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction):39S–42S.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Nelson JA, Disa JJ. Breast reconstruction and radiation therapy: an update. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017;140(5S Advances in Breast Reconstruction):60S–8S.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sbitany H, Wang F, Peled AW, Lentz R, Alvarado M, Ewing CA, Esserman LJ, Fowble B, Foster RD. Immediate implant-based breast reconstruction following total skin-sparing mastectomy: defining the risk of preoperative and postoperative radiation therapy for surgical outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;134(3):396–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Seth AK, Hirsch EM, Fine NA, Kim JY. Utility of acellular dermis-assisted breast reconstruction in the setting of radiation: a comparative analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;130(4):750–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Spear SL, Seruya M, Rao SS, Rottman S, Stolle E, Cohen M, Rose KM, Parikh PM, Nahabedian MY. Two-stage prosthetic breast reconstruction using AlloDerm including outcomes of different timings of radiotherapy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;130(1):1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sbitany H, Gomez-Sanchez C, Piper M, Lentz R. Prepectoral breast reconstruction in the setting of Postmastectomy radiation therapy: an assessment of clinical outcomes and benefits. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019;143(1):10–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of SurgeryMt. Sinai Medical CenterNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations