Advertisement

Conclusion

  • Giordon Stark
Chapter
  • 15 Downloads
Part of the Springer Theses book series (Springer Theses)

Abstract

In the first operation of the LHC, an analysis searching for new physics using the same simplified model, observed no significant excess of events over the expected SM background. In 2014, the lower limit on the gluino mass was set to be at 1.4 TeV at the 95% confidence level for this simplified signal model. The results presented in this thesis span the first two years of the second operational period of the Large Hadron Collider, during 2015 and 2016, utilizing new techniques of boosted object reconstruction to greatly extend the sensitivity to new physics and improve our understanding of the Standard Model. The lower limit of the gluino mass is now set at 1.95 TeV at the 95% confidence level using three different kinds of kinematic observables: missing energy-type, energy scale-type, and energy structure-type.

References

  1. 15.
    D. Alves, Simplified models for LHC new physics searches. J. Phys. G39, 105005 (2012). Ed. by Nima Arkani-Hamed et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/0954-3899/39/10/105005. arXiv: 1105.2838 [hep-ph]
  2. 16.
    J. Alwall, P. Schuster, N. Toro, Simplified models for a first characterization of new physics at the LHC. Phys. Rev. D79, 075020 (2009).  https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.79.075020. arXiv: 0810.3921 [hep-ph]
  3. 46.
    ATLAS Collaboration, Search for strong production of supersymmetric particles in final states with missing transverse momentum and at least three b-jets at \(\sqrt {s} = 8\) TeV proton-proton collisions with the ATLAS detector. J. High Energy Phys. 10, 24 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP10(2014)024. arXiv: 1407.0600 [hep-ex]
  4. 110.
    L. Beck, Search for the production of four top quarks at the CMS experiment at \(\sqrt {s} = 13\) TeV. In: Proceedings, 9th International Workshop on Top Quark Physics (TOP 2016): Olomouc, September 19–23, 2016 (2016). arXiv: 1611.09607 [hep-ex]. https://inspirehep.net/record/1500694/files/arXiv:1611.09607.pdf
  5. 121.
    J.M. Butterworth et al. Jet substructure as a new Higgs search channel at the LHC. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 242001 (2008).  https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.242001. arXiv: 0802.2470 [hep-ph]
  6. 122.
    J.M. Butterworth, I. Ochoa, T. Scanlon, Boosted Higgs \(\to b\bar {b}\) in vector-boson associated production at 14 TeV. Eur. Phys. J. C75(8), 366 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-015-3592-5. arXiv: 1506.04973 [hep-ph]
  7. 143.
    T. Cohen et al., Dissecting jets and missing energy searches using n-body extended simplified models. J. High Energy Phys. 8, 38 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP08(2016)038. arXiv: 1605.01416 [hep-ph]
  8. 150.
    K. Cranmer, I. Yavin, RECAST: extending the impact of existing analyses. J. High Energy Phys. 4, 38 (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP04(2011)038. arXiv: 1010.2506 [hep-ex]
  9. 201.
    A.J. Larkoski, I. Moult, B. Nachman, Jet substructure at the large hadron collider: a review of recent advances in theory and machine learning (2017). arXiv: 1709.04464 [hep-ph]
  10. 239.
    J. Shelton, Jet substructure, in Proceedings, Theoretical Advanced Study Institute in Elementary Particle Physics: Searching for New Physics at Small and Large Scales (TASI 2012): Boulder, Colorado, June 4–29, 2012 (2013), pp. 303–340. https://doi.org/10.1142/9789814525220_0007. arXiv: 1302.0260 [hep-ph]. http://inspirehep.net/record/1217434/files/arXiv:1302.0260.pdf

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Giordon Stark
    • 1
  1. 1.University of ChicagoChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations