Advertisement

Novel Approach for Stress Detection Using Smartphone and E4 Device

  • Tejaswini PanureEmail author
  • Shilpa Sonawani
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes on Data Engineering and Communications Technologies book series (LNDECT, volume 39)

Abstract

Stress reduction is important for maintaining overall human health. There are different methodologies for detecting stress including clinical tests, traditional methods and various sensors and systems developed using either a smartphone, wearable devices or sensors connected to the human body. In this paper, a novel methodology is proposed by creating a personalized model from the generalized model because stress differs from person to person for the same work profile. A generalized model for stress detection is developed from smartphone and E4 device data of all the available individuals. A generalized model is used to build a personalized model that is a person-specific model and will be build up over a time of time when enough amount of person-specific data gets collected. This proposed methodology intends to give more accuracy as two devices are used with the novel approach of model building. Various machine learning algorithms such as ANN, xgboost, and SVM are implemented with the E4 device dataset while the LASSO regression model is used for smartphone data. ANN worked best than xgboost and SVM with 93.71% accuracy. In LASSO, 0.6556 RMSE is achieved.

Keywords

Stress E4 device Artificial Neural Network (ANN) LASSO regression Xgboost Support Vector Machine (SVM) 

References

  1. 1.
    Wang, R., Chen, F., Chen, Z., Li, T., Harari, G., Tignor, S., Zhou, X., Ben-Zeev, D., Campbell, A.T.: StudentLife: assessing mental health, academic performance and behavioral trends of college students using smartphones. In: Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Ubiquitous Computing (2014)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Schmidt, P., Reiss, A., Duerichen, R., Marberger, C., Van Laerhoven, K.: Introducing WESAD, a multimodal dataset for Wearable Stress and Affect Detection. In: 2018 International Conference on Multimodal Interaction (ICMI 2018), 16–20 October 2018, Boulder, CO, USA, 9 p. ACM, New York (2018)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mitrpanont, J., Phandhu-fung, J., Klubdee, N., Ratanalaor, S., Pratiphakorn, P., Damrongvanakul, K., Chuanvaree, P., Mitrpanont, T.: iCare-stress: caring system for stress. IEEE Conference (2019)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Akmandor, A., Jha, N.: Keep the stress away with SoDA: stress detection and alleviation system. IEEE Trans. Multi- Scale Comput. Syst. 3(4), 269–282 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    de Santos Sierra, A., Avila, C.S., Casanova, J.G., BailadordelPozo, G.: A stress detection system based on physiological signals and fuzzy logic. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 58(10), 4857–4865 (2011). 2018 IEEE International Conference on Applied SystemCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ramteke, R., Thool, V.: Stress detection of students at academic level from heart rate variability. In: 2017 International Conference on Energy, Communication, Data Analytics and Soft Computing (ICECDS) (2017)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gjoreski, M., Luštrek, M., Gams, M., Gjoreski, H.: Monitoring stress with a wrist device using context. J. Biomed. Inform. 73, 159–170 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Thapliyal, H., Khalus, V., Labrado, C.: Stress detection and management: a survey of wearable smart health devices. IEEE Consum. Electron. Mag. 6(4), 64–69 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ollander, S., Godin, C., Campagne, A., Charbonnier, S.: A comparison of wearable and stationary sensors for stress detection. In: 2016 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC) (2016)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gjoreski, M., Gjoreski, H., Lutrek, M., Gams, M.:. Automatic detection of perceived stress in campus students using smartphones. In: 2015 International Conference on IntelligentEnvironments (2015)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Garcia-Ceja, E., Osmani, V., Mayora, O.: Automatic stress detection in working environments from smartphones’ accelerometer data: a first step. IEEE J. Biomed. and Health Inform. 20(4), 1053–1060 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Vaizman, Y., Ellis, K., Lanckriet, G.: Recognizing detailed human context in the wild from smartphones and smartwatches. IEEE Pervasive Comput. 16(4), 62–74 (2017). Zhang, X., Li, W., Chen, X., Lu, S. (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    MoodExplorer: Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 1– 30Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lu, J., Bi, J., Shang, C., Yue, C., Morillo, R., Ware, S., Kamath, J., Bamis, A., Russell, A., Wang, B.: Joint modeling of heterogeneous sensing data for depression assessment via multi-task learning. Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquit. Technol. 2(1), 1–21 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Xia, L., Malik, A., Subhani, A.: A physiological signal- based method for early mental-stress detection. Biomed. Signal Process. Control 46, 18–32 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sioni, R., Chittaro, L.: Stress detection using physiological sensors. Computer 48(10), 26–33 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sriramprakash, S., Prasanna, V., Murthy, O.: Stress detection in working people. Proc. Comput. Sci. 115, 359–366 (2017). Kostopoulos, P., Kyritsis, A., DeriazCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Computer Science and EngineeringDr. Vishwanath Karad MIT World Peace UniversityPuneIndia

Personalised recommendations