Advertisement

Dynamic Controller Deployment in SDN Networks Using ML Approach

  • Hemamalini Thiruvengadam
  • Ramya GopalakrishnanEmail author
  • Manoharan Rajendiran
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes on Data Engineering and Communications Technologies book series (LNDECT, volume 39)

Abstract

The Software Defined Networks (SDN) architecture deploys the programmable network by decoupling the data plane and control plane from the existing network architectures. Control activities are put into a software called controller. This new architecture, utilizes programmable controllers, enhances the intelligence of the networks’ operations and enables network engineers to serve their business requirements more efficiently. One of issues in SDN is, estimating the required number of controllers needed and placing it in optimal locations. Many works have been proposed to place controllers in its optimal locations. In most of the works, the controller placement was based on some mathematical formulations, or by heuristic approach and number of controller required was given as an input parameter. In this work, a Traffic Engineering (TE) based controller deployment is proposed. For placing controllers K-Medoid algorithm was used and ANN model was created for analysing and predicting the traffic.

Keywords

SDN Controller Network traffic Prediction ANN Controller placement 

References

  1. 1.
    Xie, J., Yu, F.R., Huang, T., Xie, R., Liu, J., Wang, C., Liu, Y.: A survey of machine learning techniques applied to software defined networking (SDN): research issues and challenges. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 21(1), 393–430 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lu, J., Zhang, Z., Tao, H., Yi, P., Lan, J.: A survey of controller placement problem in software-defined networking. IEEE Access 7, 24290–24307 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wang, M., Cui, Y., Wang, X., Xiao, S., Jiang, J.: Machine learning for networking: workflow, advances and opportunities. IEEE Netw. 32(2), 92–99 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zhang, Y., Roughan, M., Duffield, N., Greenberg, A.: Fast accurate computation of large-scale ip traffic matrices from link loads. In: ACM SIGMETRICS Performance Evaluation Review, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 206–217. ACM (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zhani, M.F., Elbiaze, H., Kamoun, F.: Analysis of prediction performance of training based models using real network traffic. Int. J. Comput. Appl. Technol. 37(1), 472–479 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wen, Y., Zhu, G.: Prediction for non-gaussian self-similar traffic with neural network. In: Intelligent Control and Automation In: 2006 The Sixth World Congress on WCICA 2006, vol. 1, pp. 4224–4228. IEEE (2006)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wen, Y., Zhu, G.: Prediction for non-gaussian self-similar traffic with neural network. In: 2006 6th World Congress on Intelligent Control and Automation, vol. 1, pp. 4224–4228. IEEE (2006)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gojmerac, I., Ziegler, T., Ricciato, F., Reichl, P.: Adaptive multipath routing for dynamic traffic engineering. In: Proceedings of the Global Telecommunications Conference GLOBECOM 2003, San Francisco, CA, USA, vol. 6, pp. 3058–3062 (2003)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Curtis, A.R., Mogul, J.C., Tourrilhes, J., Yalagandula, P., Sharma, P., Banerjee, S.: DevoFlow: scaling flow management for high performance networks. ACM SIGCOMM Comp. Commun. Rev. 41(4), 254–265 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jain, S., Kumar, A., Mandal, S., Ong, J., Poutievski, L., Singh, A., Venkata, S., et al.: B4: experience with a globally-deployed software defined WAN. In: ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 3–14. ACM (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Farhadi, H., Nakao, A.: Rethinking flow classification in SDN. In: 2014 IEEE International Conference on Cloud Engineering, pp. 598–603. IEEE (2014)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Qazi, Z.A., Lee, J., Jin, T., Bellala, G., Arndt, M., Noubir, G.: Application-awareness in SDN. In: ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 487–488. ACM (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kaur, K., Singh, J., Ghumman, N.S.: Mininet as software defined networking testing platform. In: International Conference on Communication, Computing & Systems (ICCCS), pp. 139–142 (2014)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Basheer, I.A., Hajmeer, M.: Artificial neural networks: fundamentals, computing, design, and application. J. Microbiol. Methods 43(1), 3–31 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Knight, S., Nguyen, H.X., Falkner, N., Bowden, R., Roughan, M.: The internet topology zoo. IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 29(9), 1765–1775 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hemamalini Thiruvengadam
    • 1
  • Ramya Gopalakrishnan
    • 1
    Email author
  • Manoharan Rajendiran
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Pondicherry Engineering CollegePondicherryIndia

Personalised recommendations