China’s Biomedical Scientific Leadership Flows and the Role of Proximity

  • Chaocheng He
  • Xiao Huang
  • Jiang WuEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11924)


In this paper, we propose the concept of scientific leadership, and examine the effect and evolution of various proximity dimensions (geographical, cognitive, institutional, social and economic) on scientific leadership flows. The data to capture scientific leadership consists of a set of multi-institution papers published between 2013 and 2017 in biomedical field. We filter 244 institutions that have positive scientific leadership every year. The gravity model (Tobit model) sheds light on the role and dynamic evolution of geographical, cognitive, institutional, social and economic proximity in shaping scientific leadership flows. Our findings can provide evidence and support for grant allocation policy to facilitate biomedical scientific research and collaborations.


Biomedical Scientific collaboration Scientific leadership Proximity 



This research is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 71573197).


  1. 1.
    Navarro, A., Martin, M.: Scientific production and collaboration in Epidemiology and Public Health, 1997–2002. Scientometrics 76(2), 291–313 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hoekman, J., Frenken, K., Tijssen, R.J.: Research collaboration at a distance: changing spatial patterns of scientific collaboration within Europe. Res. Policy 39(5), 662–673 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fernandez, A., Ferrandiz, E., Leon, M.D.: Proximity dimensions and scientific collaboration among academic institutions in Europe: the closer, the better? Scientometrics 106(3), 1073–1092 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Boschma, R.A.: Proximity and innovation: a critical assessment. Reg. Stud. 39(1), 61–74 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sekara, V.: The chaperone effect in scientific publishing. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 115(50), 12603–12607 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wang, L., Wang, X.: Who sets up the bridge? Tracking scientific collaborations between China and the European Union. Res. Eval. 26(2), 124–131 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wang, W., Pan, Y.: An investigation of collaborations between top Chinese universities: a new quantitative approach. Scientometrics 98(2), 1535–1545 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Berge, L.R.: Network proximity in the geography of research collaboration. Pap. Reg. Sci. 96(4), 785–817 (2017)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Acosta, M., et al.: Factors affecting inter-regional academic scientific collaboration within Europe: the role of economic distance. Scientometrics 87(1), 63–74 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wooldridge, J.M.: Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data (2003)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Information ManagementWuhan UniversityWuhanChina

Personalised recommendations