Uncertainty Analysis of a Near-Field Acoustic Levitation System
- 25 Downloads
Near-field acoustic levitation is a physical phenomenon that occurs when a planar object is placed in the proximity of a vibrating surface. Consequently, a thin layer of ambient gas, commonly referred to as squeeze film, is trapped in the clearance between a vibrating surface and an adjacent planar object performing its levitation. Mathematically, this phenomenon is described by using the Reynolds equation, which is derived from the Navier–Stokes momentum and continuity equations. The equation of motion that represents the dynamic behavior of the levitated object is also considered. However, the performance of the near-field acoustic levitation can be significantly affected by uncertainties on its geometrical parameters and operating conditions. Thus, the present contribution aims to evaluate the influence of uncertain parameters on the resulting levitation force. For this purpose, the differential evolution algorithm is associated with two strategies (inverse reliability analysis and effective mean concept). This multi-objective optimization problem considers the maximization of the levitation force associated with the maximization of both the reliability and robustness coefficients. Numerical simulations demonstrated the sensitivity of each uncertain parameter associated to the obtained levitation forces. As expected, it was verified that the levitation force decreases as the considered reliability and robustness coefficients increases.
KeywordsUncertainties Sensitivity Near-field acoustic levitation Multi-objective optimization Differential evolution
The authors are thankful for the financial support provided to the present research effort by CNPq (574001/2008-5, 304546/2018-8, and 431337/2018-7), FAPEMIG (TEC-APQ-3076-09, TEC-APQ-02284-15, TEC-APQ-00464-16, and PPM-00187-18), and CAPES through the INCT-EIE.
- 3.Melchers, R.E.: Structural Reliability Analysis and Prediction. Wiley, Chichester (1999)Google Scholar
- 8.Prigent, S., Maréchal, P., Rondepierre, A., Druot. T., Belleville, B.: A robust optimization methodology for preliminary aircraft design. Eng. Optim. 48(5), 883–899 (2015)Google Scholar
- 10.Du, X., Chen. W. Sequential optimization and reliability assessment method for efficient probabilistic design. J. Mech. Des. 126(2), 225–233 (2004)Google Scholar
- 11.Poles, S., Lovison, A.: A polynomial chaos approach to robust multiobjective optimization, hybrid and robust Approaches to multiobjective optimization. In: Deb, K., Greco, S., Miettinen, K., Zitzler, E. (eds.) Proceedings of Dagstuhl Seminar, pp. 1–15. Schloss Dagstuhl-Leibniz-Zentrum fuer Informatik, Dagstuhl. (2009)Google Scholar
- 19.Hrka, S.: Acoustic Levitation. University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Ljubljana (2015)Google Scholar
- 21.Lobato, F.S., Steffen Jr., V.: A new multi-objective optimization algorithm based on differential evolution and neighborhood exploring evolution strategy. J. Artif. Intell. Soft Comput. Res. 1, 1–12 (2011)Google Scholar
- 22.Zhao, S.: Investigation of Non-contact Bearing Systems Based on Ultrasonic Levitation. PZH, Produktionstechn (2010)Google Scholar
- 25.Storn, R., Price, K.V.: Differential evolution: a simple and efficient adaptive scheme for global optimization over continuous spaces. Int. Comput. Sci. Inst. 12, 1–16 (1995)Google Scholar
- 26.Deb. K.: Multi-Objective Optimization using Evolutionary Algorithms. Wiley, Chichester (2001)Google Scholar